Manufacturing Workers or Platform Gig Workers? The Impact of Digital Transformation in Manufacturing and Service Sectors on Job Quality and Labor Allocation

Xuan Liu , Qing Guo , Shanshan Li
{"title":"Manufacturing Workers or Platform Gig Workers? The Impact of Digital Transformation in Manufacturing and Service Sectors on Job Quality and Labor Allocation","authors":"Xuan Liu ,&nbsp;Qing Guo ,&nbsp;Shanshan Li","doi":"10.1016/j.jdec.2025.06.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper addresses an important research gap by examining how digital transformation in the manufacturing and service sectors affects job quality and labor allocation across industries. Using micro-level data from the China Labor-force Dynamic Survey (CLDS) and firm-level data from the China Employer-Employee Matching Survey (CEEMS), we employ multinomial probit model, ordered probit model, and instrumental variable method to analyze the effects of sectoral digital transformation on employment outcomes, wages, job autonomy, and satisfaction. Our results reveal that manufacturing digital transformation, centered on automation and the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT), requires high investment but generates slow returns, ultimately failing to improve job quality and contributing to declining manufacturing employment and labor shortages. In contrast, digital transformation in the service sector, driven by digital platforms and rapid channel upgrades, yields faster returns, raises wages, improves job autonomy and satisfaction, and promotes the expansion of platform gig work. These findings are robust across multiple specifications and offer new empirical insights into how differences in digitalization stages and operational models shape labor dynamics. Our study contributes to the literature by providing a comparative, cross-sectoral analysis using both worker-side and firm-side data, highlighting the mechanisms behind inter-industry labor shifts. The results have important implications for policymakers seeking to address labor shortages in manufacturing, improve job quality, and design balanced digitalization strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100773,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Digital Economy","volume":"4 ","pages":"Pages 72-94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Digital Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773067025000214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper addresses an important research gap by examining how digital transformation in the manufacturing and service sectors affects job quality and labor allocation across industries. Using micro-level data from the China Labor-force Dynamic Survey (CLDS) and firm-level data from the China Employer-Employee Matching Survey (CEEMS), we employ multinomial probit model, ordered probit model, and instrumental variable method to analyze the effects of sectoral digital transformation on employment outcomes, wages, job autonomy, and satisfaction. Our results reveal that manufacturing digital transformation, centered on automation and the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT), requires high investment but generates slow returns, ultimately failing to improve job quality and contributing to declining manufacturing employment and labor shortages. In contrast, digital transformation in the service sector, driven by digital platforms and rapid channel upgrades, yields faster returns, raises wages, improves job autonomy and satisfaction, and promotes the expansion of platform gig work. These findings are robust across multiple specifications and offer new empirical insights into how differences in digitalization stages and operational models shape labor dynamics. Our study contributes to the literature by providing a comparative, cross-sectoral analysis using both worker-side and firm-side data, highlighting the mechanisms behind inter-industry labor shifts. The results have important implications for policymakers seeking to address labor shortages in manufacturing, improve job quality, and design balanced digitalization strategies.
制造业工人还是平台零工?制造业和服务业数字化转型对工作质量和劳动力配置的影响
本文通过研究制造业和服务业的数字化转型如何影响各行业的工作质量和劳动力分配,解决了一个重要的研究空白。利用中国劳动力动态调查(CLDS)的微观层面数据和中国雇主-雇员匹配调查(CEEMS)的企业层面数据,我们采用多项probit模型、有序probit模型和工具变量法分析了行业数字化转型对就业结果、工资、工作自主性和满意度的影响。我们的研究结果表明,以自动化和工业物联网(IIoT)为中心的制造业数字化转型需要高投资,但回报缓慢,最终未能提高工作质量,并导致制造业就业人数下降和劳动力短缺。相比之下,在数字平台和渠道快速升级的推动下,服务业的数字化转型产生了更快的回报,提高了工资,提高了工作的自主性和满意度,并促进了平台零工的扩展。这些发现适用于多种规格,并为数字化阶段和运营模式的差异如何影响劳动力动态提供了新的实证见解。我们的研究对文献的贡献在于提供了一个比较的、跨部门的分析,使用了工人侧和企业侧的数据,突出了行业间劳动力转移背后的机制。研究结果对寻求解决制造业劳动力短缺、提高工作质量和设计平衡数字化战略的政策制定者具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信