The research on the effect of different alternative fuels on the injection characteristics of a double-layer eight-hole injector with needle eccentricity
Tianyu Jin , Chuqiao Wang , Qi Wang , Nicholas O'Connell , Adams Moro , Xiwen Wu , Fuqiang Luo
{"title":"The research on the effect of different alternative fuels on the injection characteristics of a double-layer eight-hole injector with needle eccentricity","authors":"Tianyu Jin , Chuqiao Wang , Qi Wang , Nicholas O'Connell , Adams Moro , Xiwen Wu , Fuqiang Luo","doi":"10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2025.102984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Accurate prediction of in-nozzle flow with alternative fuels is essential to improving spray atomization, combustion efficiency and emission control in modern diesel engines. Three-dimensional computational-fluid-dynamics simulations, based on a validated two-fluid cavitation model, were performed for a double-layer eight-hole injector supplied with six fuels—petroleum diesel (B0), Polyoxymethylene dimethyl ether (PODE), Biodiesel, n-Butanol, Butyl formate and n-Octanol—under both concentric and eccentrically guided needle motions. Findings reveal that fuel density governed the mass-flow rate in the concentric case: the densest fuel, PODE (1053 kg m<sup>−3</sup>), delivered a 14 % higher mass-flow rate than the least-dense n-Butanol (813 kg m<sup>−3</sup>), whereas the ordering of volumetric flow rates was reversed. With a 0.06 mm needle offset, viscosity influenced the cavitation development: cavitation onset for the most viscous n-Octanol (5.65 mm<sup>2</sup> s<sup>−1</sup>) lagged that of the least-viscous Butyl formate (0.61 mm<sup>2</sup> s<sup>−1</sup>) by 0.15–0.20 ms. Outlet Reynolds numbers spanned 9.8 × 10<sup>3</sup> to 9.1 × 10<sup>4</sup> across fuels, underscoring the strong influence of thermophysical properties. Needle eccentricity emerged as the dominant source of flow non-uniformity, producing up to a 12 % disparity in cycle fuel injection quantity between upper- and lower-layered orifices and as much as a 6 % disparity among holes within a layer, independent of fuel type; the upper-layered hole consistently exhibited a 4–7.5 % lower liquid-phase fraction than the lower-layered hole. These results provide the first quantitative picture of the coupled effects of needle eccentricity and diverse fuel properties on multi-layer injector performance, identifying eccentricity—not fuel formulation—as the principal driver of injection non-uniformity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50440,"journal":{"name":"Flow Measurement and Instrumentation","volume":"106 ","pages":"Article 102984"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Flow Measurement and Instrumentation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955598625001761","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Accurate prediction of in-nozzle flow with alternative fuels is essential to improving spray atomization, combustion efficiency and emission control in modern diesel engines. Three-dimensional computational-fluid-dynamics simulations, based on a validated two-fluid cavitation model, were performed for a double-layer eight-hole injector supplied with six fuels—petroleum diesel (B0), Polyoxymethylene dimethyl ether (PODE), Biodiesel, n-Butanol, Butyl formate and n-Octanol—under both concentric and eccentrically guided needle motions. Findings reveal that fuel density governed the mass-flow rate in the concentric case: the densest fuel, PODE (1053 kg m−3), delivered a 14 % higher mass-flow rate than the least-dense n-Butanol (813 kg m−3), whereas the ordering of volumetric flow rates was reversed. With a 0.06 mm needle offset, viscosity influenced the cavitation development: cavitation onset for the most viscous n-Octanol (5.65 mm2 s−1) lagged that of the least-viscous Butyl formate (0.61 mm2 s−1) by 0.15–0.20 ms. Outlet Reynolds numbers spanned 9.8 × 103 to 9.1 × 104 across fuels, underscoring the strong influence of thermophysical properties. Needle eccentricity emerged as the dominant source of flow non-uniformity, producing up to a 12 % disparity in cycle fuel injection quantity between upper- and lower-layered orifices and as much as a 6 % disparity among holes within a layer, independent of fuel type; the upper-layered hole consistently exhibited a 4–7.5 % lower liquid-phase fraction than the lower-layered hole. These results provide the first quantitative picture of the coupled effects of needle eccentricity and diverse fuel properties on multi-layer injector performance, identifying eccentricity—not fuel formulation—as the principal driver of injection non-uniformity.
期刊介绍:
Flow Measurement and Instrumentation is dedicated to disseminating the latest research results on all aspects of flow measurement, in both closed conduits and open channels. The design of flow measurement systems involves a wide variety of multidisciplinary activities including modelling the flow sensor, the fluid flow and the sensor/fluid interactions through the use of computation techniques; the development of advanced transducer systems and their associated signal processing and the laboratory and field assessment of the overall system under ideal and disturbed conditions.
FMI is the essential forum for critical information exchange, and contributions are particularly encouraged in the following areas of interest:
Modelling: the application of mathematical and computational modelling to the interaction of fluid dynamics with flowmeters, including flowmeter behaviour, improved flowmeter design and installation problems. Application of CAD/CAE techniques to flowmeter modelling are eligible.
Design and development: the detailed design of the flowmeter head and/or signal processing aspects of novel flowmeters. Emphasis is given to papers identifying new sensor configurations, multisensor flow measurement systems, non-intrusive flow metering techniques and the application of microelectronic techniques in smart or intelligent systems.
Calibration techniques: including descriptions of new or existing calibration facilities and techniques, calibration data from different flowmeter types, and calibration intercomparison data from different laboratories.
Installation effect data: dealing with the effects of non-ideal flow conditions on flowmeters. Papers combining a theoretical understanding of flowmeter behaviour with experimental work are particularly welcome.