{"title":"Movement-related cortical potential during dual tasks with distinct load levels","authors":"Daisuke Hirano , Misaki Wada , Naotoshi Kimura , Yoshinobu Goto , Takamichi Taniguchi","doi":"10.1016/j.bbr.2025.115730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We investigated movement-related cortical potential (MRCP) during dual-task performance under different levels of secondary task load. This study included 20 healthy young, right-footed adults. MRCPs were measured under three conditions. The single task (ST) involved internal-paced dorsiflexion of the right ankle joint, whereas in the simple dual task (DT-S) and complex dual task (DT-C), participants engaged in the ST along with a visual number counting and memorizing task, with varying levels of cognitive load. These conditions represented no-, low-, and high-load divided attention tasks, respectively. Although the coefficient of variation (CV) in movement interval was higher during DT-C compared to ST and DT-S, the negative peak amplitude of MRCPs, recorded from the Cz electrode using the international 10/20 system, was lower in DT-S and DT-C compared to ST. Although no significant differences in CV were observed, DT-S resulted in a significant decrease in MRCP amplitude. Our findings indicate that MRCPs may serve as a biomarker for assessing divided attention capacity during dual-task performance, even in the absence of observable differences in task performance. These results suggest that the MRCP amplitude is an indicator of supplementary motor area activation, highlighting the crucial role of attention division in movement preparation and execution when performing dual tasks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8823,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Brain Research","volume":"494 ","pages":"Article 115730"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioural Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166432825003171","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We investigated movement-related cortical potential (MRCP) during dual-task performance under different levels of secondary task load. This study included 20 healthy young, right-footed adults. MRCPs were measured under three conditions. The single task (ST) involved internal-paced dorsiflexion of the right ankle joint, whereas in the simple dual task (DT-S) and complex dual task (DT-C), participants engaged in the ST along with a visual number counting and memorizing task, with varying levels of cognitive load. These conditions represented no-, low-, and high-load divided attention tasks, respectively. Although the coefficient of variation (CV) in movement interval was higher during DT-C compared to ST and DT-S, the negative peak amplitude of MRCPs, recorded from the Cz electrode using the international 10/20 system, was lower in DT-S and DT-C compared to ST. Although no significant differences in CV were observed, DT-S resulted in a significant decrease in MRCP amplitude. Our findings indicate that MRCPs may serve as a biomarker for assessing divided attention capacity during dual-task performance, even in the absence of observable differences in task performance. These results suggest that the MRCP amplitude is an indicator of supplementary motor area activation, highlighting the crucial role of attention division in movement preparation and execution when performing dual tasks.
期刊介绍:
Behavioural Brain Research is an international, interdisciplinary journal dedicated to the publication of articles in the field of behavioural neuroscience, broadly defined. Contributions from the entire range of disciplines that comprise the neurosciences, behavioural sciences or cognitive sciences are appropriate, as long as the goal is to delineate the neural mechanisms underlying behaviour. Thus, studies may range from neurophysiological, neuroanatomical, neurochemical or neuropharmacological analysis of brain-behaviour relations, including the use of molecular genetic or behavioural genetic approaches, to studies that involve the use of brain imaging techniques, to neuroethological studies. Reports of original research, of major methodological advances, or of novel conceptual approaches are all encouraged. The journal will also consider critical reviews on selected topics.