Trends in endometriosis interventions: an interrupted time series analysis following the Australian National Action Plan for Endometriosis (NAPE) 2018.
{"title":"Trends in endometriosis interventions: an interrupted time series analysis following the Australian National Action Plan for Endometriosis (NAPE) 2018.","authors":"Chiemeka C Chinaka, Brenda Gannon, Jenny Doust","doi":"10.1071/AH25047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveThis study aimed to highlight trends in the utilisation of selected endometriosis treatments before and after the launch of the National Action Plan for Endometriosis and observe the impact of the action plan on the utilisation of these interventions.MethodsMonthly Medicare and Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme claims were used to represent the utilisation of laparoscopic resection and nafarelin for endometriosis. Time series analysis using autoregressive integrated moving average models was used to establish the trend in the utilisation of these treatments. An interruption was then applied at the launch of the plan, and a counterfactual prediction was modelled based on the claims made before the interruption. Factual values and counterfactual predictions were compared to evaluate the impact of the plan.ResultsThe action plan was associated with an immediate increase of 3.94 Medicare Benefits Schedule claims per month (95% CI -44.61 to 52.50) and an estimated change in slope of 1.30 claims per month (95% confidence interval (CI) -3.80 to 6.30) for laparoscopic resection. Nafarelin dispensing after the launch of the action plan had an immediate increase of 68.30 dispensing claims per month (95% CI -4.34 to 141.03), with a slope change of -2.84 claims per month (95% CI -10.975 to 5.293).ConclusionsThe results suggest that although the action plan was linked with a marked immediate spike in the utilisation of nafarelin, it did not make any difference in the long term. However, it may have contributed to a small but steady increase in the utilisation of laparoscopic resection, used in severe cases of the condition.</p>","PeriodicalId":93891,"journal":{"name":"Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/AH25047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ObjectiveThis study aimed to highlight trends in the utilisation of selected endometriosis treatments before and after the launch of the National Action Plan for Endometriosis and observe the impact of the action plan on the utilisation of these interventions.MethodsMonthly Medicare and Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme claims were used to represent the utilisation of laparoscopic resection and nafarelin for endometriosis. Time series analysis using autoregressive integrated moving average models was used to establish the trend in the utilisation of these treatments. An interruption was then applied at the launch of the plan, and a counterfactual prediction was modelled based on the claims made before the interruption. Factual values and counterfactual predictions were compared to evaluate the impact of the plan.ResultsThe action plan was associated with an immediate increase of 3.94 Medicare Benefits Schedule claims per month (95% CI -44.61 to 52.50) and an estimated change in slope of 1.30 claims per month (95% confidence interval (CI) -3.80 to 6.30) for laparoscopic resection. Nafarelin dispensing after the launch of the action plan had an immediate increase of 68.30 dispensing claims per month (95% CI -4.34 to 141.03), with a slope change of -2.84 claims per month (95% CI -10.975 to 5.293).ConclusionsThe results suggest that although the action plan was linked with a marked immediate spike in the utilisation of nafarelin, it did not make any difference in the long term. However, it may have contributed to a small but steady increase in the utilisation of laparoscopic resection, used in severe cases of the condition.
目的本研究旨在强调在子宫内膜异位症国家行动计划启动前后选定子宫内膜异位症治疗方法的使用趋势,并观察行动计划对这些干预措施的使用的影响。方法使用每月医疗保险和药品福利计划的索赔来代表腹腔镜切除和纳伐林治疗子宫内膜异位症的应用。使用自回归综合移动平均模型的时间序列分析用于确定这些处理的利用趋势。然后在计划启动时应用中断,并根据中断前的声明建立反事实预测模型。通过比较事实值和反事实预测值来评估该计划的影响。结果该行动计划与每月3.94例医疗保险福利计划索赔的立即增加(95% CI为-44.61至52.50)和每月1.30例索赔的估计斜率变化(95%置信区间(CI)为-3.80至6.30)相关。在行动计划启动后,纳伐雷林分配每月立即增加68.30份分配索赔(95% CI -4.34至141.03),斜率变化为每月-2.84份索赔(95% CI -10.975至5.293)。结论:结果表明,尽管该行动计划与纳伐林的使用有明显的即时激增联系在一起,但从长期来看,它并没有产生任何差异。然而,它可能促成了一个小但稳定的增加,在腹腔镜切除术的应用,在严重的情况下使用。