Patient Safety Leaders' Perception of Patient Safety Practices in Eight Asia-Pacific Countries: Survey Based on the Global Patient Safety Action Plan Framework.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Pub Date : 2025-07-02 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/RMHP.S487580
Jacob Yongsu Ahn, Mabel Wan Chi Sim, Zann Sue Ting Foo, Kok Hian Tan
{"title":"Patient Safety Leaders' Perception of Patient Safety Practices in Eight Asia-Pacific Countries: Survey Based on the Global Patient Safety Action Plan Framework.","authors":"Jacob Yongsu Ahn, Mabel Wan Chi Sim, Zann Sue Ting Foo, Kok Hian Tan","doi":"10.2147/RMHP.S487580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aim was to assess patient safety leaders' perception of patient safety practices in the Asia-Pacific region based on Strategic Objectives of the Global Patient Safety Action Plan (GPSAP) Framework.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A self-assessment survey tool with quantitative and qualitative components was sent to patient safety leaders from 25 healthcare facilities in 17 countries participating in the Global Action for Leaders & Learning Organizations on Patient Safety (GALLOPS) initiative, the majority of which were from LMICs in the Asia-Pacific region. The survey, based on the GPSAP's 7 strategic objectives, covered 35 patient safety areas. Each area was rated on a scale from 1 (not established) to 5 (strongly established with good practices). The mean score of each strategic area, strategic objective, and overall strategic objective establishments were calculated. Good and sub-optimal practices of GALLOPS-participating countries were identified and tabulated according to GPSAP-defined patient safety strategies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 15 self-rated responses were received from patient safety leaders of 8 GALLOPS-participating Asia-Pacific countries' healthcare facilities. The overall mean scores of the establishment level of all self-assessed strategic objectives were: Singapore (3.84), Malaysia (3.66), South Korea (3.56), India (3.20), Sri Lanka (3.09), Indonesia (2.48), Nepal (2.12), Maldives (1.94). The total mean score of the establishment level of all healthcare facilities' strategic objectives was 2.99. Strategic Objective 3 - Safety of clinical processes had the highest mean score of 3.41, while Strategic Objective 4 - Patient and family engagement and Strategic Objective 7 - Synergy, partnership and solidarity had 2.60 and 2.72, having two lowest mean scores for all countries' healthcare facilities, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study revealed substantial differences in perception of patient safety practices across healthcare facilities of Asia-Pacific countries and across the strategic objectives. This helped to establish a baseline of patient safety landscape in Asia-Pacific and represented opportunities for promoting equity and sustainability in healthcare as well as improving patient safety system and culture.</p>","PeriodicalId":56009,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"18 ","pages":"2217-2231"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12230327/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S487580","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study aim was to assess patient safety leaders' perception of patient safety practices in the Asia-Pacific region based on Strategic Objectives of the Global Patient Safety Action Plan (GPSAP) Framework.

Methodology: A self-assessment survey tool with quantitative and qualitative components was sent to patient safety leaders from 25 healthcare facilities in 17 countries participating in the Global Action for Leaders & Learning Organizations on Patient Safety (GALLOPS) initiative, the majority of which were from LMICs in the Asia-Pacific region. The survey, based on the GPSAP's 7 strategic objectives, covered 35 patient safety areas. Each area was rated on a scale from 1 (not established) to 5 (strongly established with good practices). The mean score of each strategic area, strategic objective, and overall strategic objective establishments were calculated. Good and sub-optimal practices of GALLOPS-participating countries were identified and tabulated according to GPSAP-defined patient safety strategies.

Results: A total of 15 self-rated responses were received from patient safety leaders of 8 GALLOPS-participating Asia-Pacific countries' healthcare facilities. The overall mean scores of the establishment level of all self-assessed strategic objectives were: Singapore (3.84), Malaysia (3.66), South Korea (3.56), India (3.20), Sri Lanka (3.09), Indonesia (2.48), Nepal (2.12), Maldives (1.94). The total mean score of the establishment level of all healthcare facilities' strategic objectives was 2.99. Strategic Objective 3 - Safety of clinical processes had the highest mean score of 3.41, while Strategic Objective 4 - Patient and family engagement and Strategic Objective 7 - Synergy, partnership and solidarity had 2.60 and 2.72, having two lowest mean scores for all countries' healthcare facilities, respectively.

Conclusion: Our study revealed substantial differences in perception of patient safety practices across healthcare facilities of Asia-Pacific countries and across the strategic objectives. This helped to establish a baseline of patient safety landscape in Asia-Pacific and represented opportunities for promoting equity and sustainability in healthcare as well as improving patient safety system and culture.

八个亚太国家患者安全领导者对患者安全实践的看法:基于全球患者安全行动计划框架的调查。
本研究旨在基于全球患者安全行动计划(GPSAP)框架的战略目标,评估亚太地区患者安全领导者对患者安全实践的看法。方法:向参与“患者安全领导者和学习型组织全球行动”(GALLOPS)倡议的17个国家的25家医疗机构的患者安全负责人发送了一份包含定量和定性成分的自我评估调查工具,其中大多数来自亚太地区的中低收入国家。该调查基于GPSAP的7个战略目标,涵盖35个患者安全领域。每个领域的评分范围从1(未建立)到5(良好实践的牢固建立)。计算各战略区域、战略目标和总体战略目标设施的平均分。根据gpsp定义的患者安全策略,确定了gallops参与国的良好和次优做法并将其制成表格。结果:共收到来自8个gallops参与的亚太国家医疗机构的患者安全负责人的15份自评回复。各自评战略目标建立水平的总体平均得分为:新加坡(3.84)、马来西亚(3.66)、韩国(3.56)、印度(3.20)、斯里兰卡(3.09)、印度尼西亚(2.48)、尼泊尔(2.12)、马尔代夫(1.94)。所有医疗卫生机构战略目标编制水平的总平均得分为2.99分。战略目标3 -临床过程安全的平均得分最高,为3.41,而战略目标4 -患者和家庭参与和战略目标7 -协同、伙伴关系和团结的平均得分分别为2.60和2.72,在所有国家的医疗保健设施中,这两个指标的平均得分最低。结论:我们的研究揭示了亚太国家医疗机构和战略目标之间对患者安全实践的看法存在实质性差异。这有助于建立亚太地区患者安全格局的基线,并为促进医疗保健的公平性和可持续性以及改善患者安全系统和文化提供了机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
242
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Risk Management and Healthcare Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on all aspects of public health, policy and preventative measures to promote good health and improve morbidity and mortality in the population. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Public and community health Policy and law Preventative and predictive healthcare Risk and hazard management Epidemiology, detection and screening Lifestyle and diet modification Vaccination and disease transmission/modification programs Health and safety and occupational health Healthcare services provision Health literacy and education Advertising and promotion of health issues Health economic evaluations and resource management Risk Management and Healthcare Policy focuses on human interventional and observational research. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and extended reports. Case reports will only be considered if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信