2D-to-3D: Predicting three-dimensional (3D) cephalometric measurements from two conventional X-ray images : From 2D to 3D with a computational tool without using computed tomography.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Abhishek Gupta, Shailendra Singh Rana, Sharvari Vichare
{"title":"2D-to-3D: Predicting three-dimensional (3D) cephalometric measurements from two conventional X-ray images : From 2D to 3D with a computational tool without using computed tomography.","authors":"Abhishek Gupta, Shailendra Singh Rana, Sharvari Vichare","doi":"10.1007/s00056-025-00599-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The use of computed tomography (CT) or cone-beam CT (CBCT) enables three-dimensional (3D) cephalometric analysis but exposes patients to high levels of radiation, while conventional X‑ray imaging provides projected measurements for two-dimensional (2D) cephalometric analysis with lower radiation exposure. The presented tool overcomes the disadvantages of both imaging modalities for performing 3D cephalometric analysis. Our tool aims to evolve a 3D framework from the fusion of conventional lateral and posteroanterior (PA) X‑ray images for performing 3D cephalometric analysis. Lateral and PA image datasets of 27 patients were used to validate the proposed tool. A total of 29 cephalometric landmarks were plotted on each image, and therefore, a total of 406 measurements were computed on each patient's image. An image registration-based method was implemented using the MATLAB (MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA) programming language for the prediction of 3D landmarks and computation of cephalometric measurements. The same 406 measurements were compared with measurements made on corresponding CT images. Statistical parameters, e.g., average error, standard deviation, t‑test, and correlation coefficient were computed to evaluate the performance of the proposed tool. The average mean error and average standard deviation of the 406 measurements were 2.40 and 1.77 mm, respectively. Using the proposed tool, a 3D cephalometric analysis can be performed using two X‑ray images, avoiding the need for CT/CBCT images. The proposed tool is the first method to evolve 3D cephalometric landmarks and measurements from two conventional X‑ray images, and the overall results were satisfactory.</p>","PeriodicalId":54776,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics-Fortschritte Der Kieferorthopadie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics-Fortschritte Der Kieferorthopadie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-025-00599-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of computed tomography (CT) or cone-beam CT (CBCT) enables three-dimensional (3D) cephalometric analysis but exposes patients to high levels of radiation, while conventional X‑ray imaging provides projected measurements for two-dimensional (2D) cephalometric analysis with lower radiation exposure. The presented tool overcomes the disadvantages of both imaging modalities for performing 3D cephalometric analysis. Our tool aims to evolve a 3D framework from the fusion of conventional lateral and posteroanterior (PA) X‑ray images for performing 3D cephalometric analysis. Lateral and PA image datasets of 27 patients were used to validate the proposed tool. A total of 29 cephalometric landmarks were plotted on each image, and therefore, a total of 406 measurements were computed on each patient's image. An image registration-based method was implemented using the MATLAB (MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA) programming language for the prediction of 3D landmarks and computation of cephalometric measurements. The same 406 measurements were compared with measurements made on corresponding CT images. Statistical parameters, e.g., average error, standard deviation, t‑test, and correlation coefficient were computed to evaluate the performance of the proposed tool. The average mean error and average standard deviation of the 406 measurements were 2.40 and 1.77 mm, respectively. Using the proposed tool, a 3D cephalometric analysis can be performed using two X‑ray images, avoiding the need for CT/CBCT images. The proposed tool is the first method to evolve 3D cephalometric landmarks and measurements from two conventional X‑ray images, and the overall results were satisfactory.

2D-to-3D:从两个传统x射线图像预测三维(3D)头部测量结果:使用计算工具从2D到3D,而不使用计算机断层扫描。
使用计算机断层扫描(CT)或锥束CT (CBCT)可以进行三维(3D)头部测量分析,但会使患者暴露在高水平的辐射中,而传统的X射线成像为二维(2D)头部测量分析提供投影测量,辐射暴露较低。提出的工具克服了两种成像方式的缺点,用于执行3D头测量分析。我们的工具旨在从传统的侧位和后前位(PA) X线图像融合中发展出3D框架,用于进行3D头部测量分析。使用27例患者的侧位和正侧图像数据集来验证所提出的工具。每张图像上总共绘制了29个头颅测量标志,因此,在每个患者的图像上总共计算了406个测量值。使用MATLAB (MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA)编程语言实现基于图像配准的方法,用于预测3D地标和计算头侧测量值。同样的406个测量值与相应的CT图像的测量值进行了比较。计算统计参数,如平均误差、标准差、t检验和相关系数,以评估所提出工具的性能。406次测量的平均平均误差和平均标准偏差分别为2.40和1.77 mm。使用该工具,可以使用两张X线图像进行3D头部测量分析,避免了对CT/CBCT图像的需要。该工具是第一种从两张常规X射线图像中进化出3D头部测量标志和测量结果的方法,总体结果令人满意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics provides orthodontists and dentists who are also actively interested in orthodontics, whether in university clinics or private practice, with highly authoritative and up-to-date information based on experimental and clinical research. The journal is one of the leading publications for the promulgation of the results of original work both in the areas of scientific and clinical orthodontics and related areas. All articles undergo peer review before publication. The German Society of Orthodontics (DGKFO) also publishes in the journal important communications, statements and announcements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信