Towards a complex ecology: an essay on plague history in Brazil (1890s-1970s).

IF 0.1 4区 哲学 Q3 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Matheus Alves Duarte da Silva
{"title":"Towards a complex ecology: an essay on plague history in Brazil (1890s-1970s).","authors":"Matheus Alves Duarte da Silva","doi":"10.30827/dynamis.v45i1.33090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper offers a periodization of the history of plague in Brazil. It is based on the ways in which experts and public health officers framed the disease, the elements they considered responsible for its spread, and changes in these elements over time. In accordance with this periodization, the article first argues that the ecology of plague became progressively more complex in the 20th century, suggesting the rise of a more ecological-oriented view among Brazilian doctors. It then proposes that political and institutional transformations also shaped this intellectual change in the epidemiological reasoning about pla gue in Brazil. The periodization is divided into three phases. The first phase ex tends from 1897, with the start of discussions about the risk of plague arriving in Brazil from Asia, to 1920, with a substantial reduction in the number of plague cases in coastal cities. In this initial phase, the framing of the plague transitioned from a disease spread by humans and the objects they touched to one spread by rats and their fleas. The second phase, from 1920 to 1950, was characterized by the hegemony of rats in epidemiological explanations for the presence of plague in cities and rural areas of Brazil. The third and final phase, from 1951 to the early 1970s, was characterized by the progressive inclusion of wild rodents into scientific explanations for the spread and especially persistence of plague in some foci, mainly in the North-East. At the end of this phase, the scientific consensus in Brazil was that wild rodents constituted the main plague reservoir.</p>","PeriodicalId":50561,"journal":{"name":"Dynamis","volume":"45 1","pages":"109-134"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7617830/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dynamis","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30827/dynamis.v45i1.33090","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper offers a periodization of the history of plague in Brazil. It is based on the ways in which experts and public health officers framed the disease, the elements they considered responsible for its spread, and changes in these elements over time. In accordance with this periodization, the article first argues that the ecology of plague became progressively more complex in the 20th century, suggesting the rise of a more ecological-oriented view among Brazilian doctors. It then proposes that political and institutional transformations also shaped this intellectual change in the epidemiological reasoning about pla gue in Brazil. The periodization is divided into three phases. The first phase ex tends from 1897, with the start of discussions about the risk of plague arriving in Brazil from Asia, to 1920, with a substantial reduction in the number of plague cases in coastal cities. In this initial phase, the framing of the plague transitioned from a disease spread by humans and the objects they touched to one spread by rats and their fleas. The second phase, from 1920 to 1950, was characterized by the hegemony of rats in epidemiological explanations for the presence of plague in cities and rural areas of Brazil. The third and final phase, from 1951 to the early 1970s, was characterized by the progressive inclusion of wild rodents into scientific explanations for the spread and especially persistence of plague in some foci, mainly in the North-East. At the end of this phase, the scientific consensus in Brazil was that wild rodents constituted the main plague reservoir.

走向复杂的生态:一篇关于巴西鼠疫历史的论文(19世纪90年代至70年代)。
本文对巴西鼠疫的历史进行了分期。它是基于专家和公共卫生官员定义疾病的方式,他们认为导致疾病传播的因素,以及这些因素随时间的变化。根据这一分期,这篇文章首先认为,鼠疫的生态学在20世纪变得越来越复杂,这表明巴西医生中出现了一种更加以生态学为导向的观点。然后,它提出,政治和制度变革也影响了巴西鼠疫流行病学推理的知识变化。周期划分分为三个阶段。第一阶段从1897年开始,开始讨论鼠疫从亚洲传入巴西的风险,到1920年,沿海城市鼠疫病例数量大幅减少。在这一初始阶段,鼠疫的框架从一种由人类及其接触的物体传播的疾病转变为一种由老鼠及其跳蚤传播的疾病。第二阶段,从1920年到1950年,其特点是老鼠在流行病学解释巴西城市和农村鼠疫存在方面占据主导地位。第三个也是最后一个阶段,从1951年到1970年代初,其特点是逐渐将野生啮齿动物纳入对鼠疫在一些疫源地(主要在东北部)传播和持续存在的科学解释中。在这一阶段结束时,巴西科学界的共识是,野生啮齿动物构成了鼠疫的主要宿主。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dynamis
Dynamis 社会科学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: DYNAMIS is an international journal devoted to the history of medicine, health and science, founded in 1981, that pays special attention to novel and interdisciplinary historiographic perspectives. It offers original, double peer-reviewed research studies (articles, notes or documents) and reviews in languages of the European Union.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信