Payal Soni, Jitendra Singh, Bhartendu Vimal, Manoj Kumar, Leena Lokhande, Anvita Malhotra Gupta, Arti Shrivas, Anand Kumar Maurya, Shashank Purwar, Sarman Singh
{"title":"Genetic Characterization of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Isolated from Captive Zoo Animals.","authors":"Payal Soni, Jitendra Singh, Bhartendu Vimal, Manoj Kumar, Leena Lokhande, Anvita Malhotra Gupta, Arti Shrivas, Anand Kumar Maurya, Shashank Purwar, Sarman Singh","doi":"10.1007/s10393-025-01726-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Zoonotic tuberculosis is a neglected subject that has the potential to impede the effectiveness of the TB elimination program. The present study aimed to determine the genetic diversity and drug resistance in the Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from captive wild animals. A total of 67 tissue samples were collected from 33 animals, comprising 21 wild captive animals from various species and 12 slaughtered domestic buffaloes. These samples were subjected to the detection of Mycobacterial species by culture isolation, and further molecular identification by mPCR, Xpert-Ultra and TrueNat MTB/Rif assay; followed by drug susceptibility profiling by MTBDRplus and Spoligotyping of the isolates. Of the 67 samples from captive zoo animals, 44 samples were culture positive. Of these, 38 isolates were identified as Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex (MTBC) and remaining 6 were identified as non- tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM). All NTM isolates were from different tissues of a Tigress which also had mixed infection with MTBC. All the 38 culture isolates were further subjected to phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (pDST) and genotyping. Twenty-eight (73.69%) of them, were pan-susceptible, 9 (23.68%) exhibited isoniazid mono-resistance, and 1 (2.63%) was rifampicin mono-resistant. On genotyping, 27 (71.05%) of the samples were classified as 'Orphan'. Ten (26.32%) isolates were identified as CAS1_DELHI, clustered within SIT number 375, while one sample (2.63%) remained unidentified. The drug resistance and genotyping patterns were similar to the human population. Our results show that M. tuberculosis was major cause of Zoonotic TB and should be considered as potential reverse zoonotic agent in India.</p>","PeriodicalId":51027,"journal":{"name":"Ecohealth","volume":" ","pages":"387-402"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecohealth","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-025-01726-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Zoonotic tuberculosis is a neglected subject that has the potential to impede the effectiveness of the TB elimination program. The present study aimed to determine the genetic diversity and drug resistance in the Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from captive wild animals. A total of 67 tissue samples were collected from 33 animals, comprising 21 wild captive animals from various species and 12 slaughtered domestic buffaloes. These samples were subjected to the detection of Mycobacterial species by culture isolation, and further molecular identification by mPCR, Xpert-Ultra and TrueNat MTB/Rif assay; followed by drug susceptibility profiling by MTBDRplus and Spoligotyping of the isolates. Of the 67 samples from captive zoo animals, 44 samples were culture positive. Of these, 38 isolates were identified as Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex (MTBC) and remaining 6 were identified as non- tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM). All NTM isolates were from different tissues of a Tigress which also had mixed infection with MTBC. All the 38 culture isolates were further subjected to phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (pDST) and genotyping. Twenty-eight (73.69%) of them, were pan-susceptible, 9 (23.68%) exhibited isoniazid mono-resistance, and 1 (2.63%) was rifampicin mono-resistant. On genotyping, 27 (71.05%) of the samples were classified as 'Orphan'. Ten (26.32%) isolates were identified as CAS1_DELHI, clustered within SIT number 375, while one sample (2.63%) remained unidentified. The drug resistance and genotyping patterns were similar to the human population. Our results show that M. tuberculosis was major cause of Zoonotic TB and should be considered as potential reverse zoonotic agent in India.
期刊介绍:
EcoHealth aims to advance research, practice, and knowledge integration at the interface of ecology and health by publishing high quality research and review articles that address and profile new ideas, developments, and programs. The journal’s scope encompasses research that integrates concepts and theory from many fields of scholarship (including ecological, social and health sciences, and the humanities) and draws upon multiple types of knowledge, including those of relevance to practice and policy. Papers address integrated ecology and health challenges arising in public health, human and veterinary medicine, conservation and ecosystem management, rural and urban development and planning, and other fields that address the social-ecological context of health. The journal is a central platform for fulfilling the mission of the EcoHealth Alliance to strive for sustainable health of people, domestic animals, wildlife, and ecosystems by promoting discovery, understanding, and transdisciplinarity.
The journal invites substantial contributions in the following areas:
One Health and Conservation Medicine
o Integrated research on health of humans, wildlife, livestock and ecosystems
o Research and policy in ecology, public health, and agricultural sustainability
o Emerging infectious diseases affecting people, wildlife, domestic animals, and plants
o Research and practice linking human and animal health and/or social-ecological systems
o Anthropogenic environmental change and drivers of disease emergence in humans, wildlife, livestock and ecosystems
o Health of humans and animals in relation to terrestrial, freshwater, and marine ecosystems
Ecosystem Approaches to Health
o Systems thinking and social-ecological systems in relation to health
o Transdiiplinary approaches to health, ecosystems and society.