Genetic Characterization of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Isolated from Captive Zoo Animals.

IF 2.2 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Ecohealth Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-08 DOI:10.1007/s10393-025-01726-w
Payal Soni, Jitendra Singh, Bhartendu Vimal, Manoj Kumar, Leena Lokhande, Anvita Malhotra Gupta, Arti Shrivas, Anand Kumar Maurya, Shashank Purwar, Sarman Singh
{"title":"Genetic Characterization of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Isolated from Captive Zoo Animals.","authors":"Payal Soni, Jitendra Singh, Bhartendu Vimal, Manoj Kumar, Leena Lokhande, Anvita Malhotra Gupta, Arti Shrivas, Anand Kumar Maurya, Shashank Purwar, Sarman Singh","doi":"10.1007/s10393-025-01726-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Zoonotic tuberculosis is a neglected subject that has the potential to impede the effectiveness of the TB elimination program. The present study aimed to determine the genetic diversity and drug resistance in the Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from captive wild animals. A total of 67 tissue samples were collected from 33 animals, comprising 21 wild captive animals from various species and 12 slaughtered domestic buffaloes. These samples were subjected to the detection of Mycobacterial species by culture isolation, and further molecular identification by mPCR, Xpert-Ultra and TrueNat MTB/Rif assay; followed by drug susceptibility profiling by MTBDRplus and Spoligotyping of the isolates. Of the 67 samples from captive zoo animals, 44 samples were culture positive. Of these, 38 isolates were identified as Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex (MTBC) and remaining 6 were identified as non- tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM). All NTM isolates were from different tissues of a Tigress which also had mixed infection with MTBC. All the 38 culture isolates were further subjected to phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (pDST) and genotyping. Twenty-eight (73.69%) of them, were pan-susceptible, 9 (23.68%) exhibited isoniazid mono-resistance, and 1 (2.63%) was rifampicin mono-resistant. On genotyping, 27 (71.05%) of the samples were classified as 'Orphan'. Ten (26.32%) isolates were identified as CAS1_DELHI, clustered within SIT number 375, while one sample (2.63%) remained unidentified. The drug resistance and genotyping patterns were similar to the human population. Our results show that M. tuberculosis was major cause of Zoonotic TB and should be considered as potential reverse zoonotic agent in India.</p>","PeriodicalId":51027,"journal":{"name":"Ecohealth","volume":" ","pages":"387-402"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecohealth","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-025-01726-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Zoonotic tuberculosis is a neglected subject that has the potential to impede the effectiveness of the TB elimination program. The present study aimed to determine the genetic diversity and drug resistance in the Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from captive wild animals. A total of 67 tissue samples were collected from 33 animals, comprising 21 wild captive animals from various species and 12 slaughtered domestic buffaloes. These samples were subjected to the detection of Mycobacterial species by culture isolation, and further molecular identification by mPCR, Xpert-Ultra and TrueNat MTB/Rif assay; followed by drug susceptibility profiling by MTBDRplus and Spoligotyping of the isolates. Of the 67 samples from captive zoo animals, 44 samples were culture positive. Of these, 38 isolates were identified as Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex (MTBC) and remaining 6 were identified as non- tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM). All NTM isolates were from different tissues of a Tigress which also had mixed infection with MTBC. All the 38 culture isolates were further subjected to phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (pDST) and genotyping. Twenty-eight (73.69%) of them, were pan-susceptible, 9 (23.68%) exhibited isoniazid mono-resistance, and 1 (2.63%) was rifampicin mono-resistant. On genotyping, 27 (71.05%) of the samples were classified as 'Orphan'. Ten (26.32%) isolates were identified as CAS1_DELHI, clustered within SIT number 375, while one sample (2.63%) remained unidentified. The drug resistance and genotyping patterns were similar to the human population. Our results show that M. tuberculosis was major cause of Zoonotic TB and should be considered as potential reverse zoonotic agent in India.

圈养动物园动物结核分枝杆菌的遗传特征。
人畜共患结核病是一个被忽视的问题,有可能阻碍结核病消除规划的有效性。本研究旨在确定圈养野生动物结核分枝杆菌分离株的遗传多样性和耐药性。共采集了33只动物的67个组织样本,其中包括21只不同种类的野生圈养动物和12头屠宰的家养水牛。通过培养分离检测分枝杆菌种类,并通过mPCR、expert - ultra和TrueNat MTB/Rif实验进行分子鉴定;然后用MTBDRplus进行药物敏感性分析,并对分离株进行Spoligotyping。在67个圈养动物园动物样本中,44个样本培养阳性。其中,38株被鉴定为结核分枝杆菌复合体(MTBC),其余6株被鉴定为非结核分枝杆菌(NTM)。所有的NTM分离株均来自同一母老虎的不同组织,并与MTBC混合感染。对38株培养菌株进行表型药敏试验(pDST)和基因分型。其中泛敏感28例(73.69%),单异烟肼耐药9例(23.68%),利福平耐药1例(2.63%)。在基因分型上,27份(71.05%)样本被归为“孤儿”。10株(26.32%)分离株被鉴定为CAS1_DELHI,聚集在SIT编号375内,1株(2.63%)未被鉴定。耐药和基因分型模式与人群相似。我们的结果表明,结核分枝杆菌是印度人畜共患结核病的主要原因,应考虑作为潜在的反向人畜共患病原体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecohealth
Ecohealth 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊介绍: EcoHealth aims to advance research, practice, and knowledge integration at the interface of ecology and health by publishing high quality research and review articles that address and profile new ideas, developments, and programs. The journal’s scope encompasses research that integrates concepts and theory from many fields of scholarship (including ecological, social and health sciences, and the humanities) and draws upon multiple types of knowledge, including those of relevance to practice and policy. Papers address integrated ecology and health challenges arising in public health, human and veterinary medicine, conservation and ecosystem management, rural and urban development and planning, and other fields that address the social-ecological context of health. The journal is a central platform for fulfilling the mission of the EcoHealth Alliance to strive for sustainable health of people, domestic animals, wildlife, and ecosystems by promoting discovery, understanding, and transdisciplinarity. The journal invites substantial contributions in the following areas: One Health and Conservation Medicine o Integrated research on health of humans, wildlife, livestock and ecosystems o Research and policy in ecology, public health, and agricultural sustainability o Emerging infectious diseases affecting people, wildlife, domestic animals, and plants o Research and practice linking human and animal health and/or social-ecological systems o Anthropogenic environmental change and drivers of disease emergence in humans, wildlife, livestock and ecosystems o Health of humans and animals in relation to terrestrial, freshwater, and marine ecosystems Ecosystem Approaches to Health o Systems thinking and social-ecological systems in relation to health o Transdiiplinary approaches to health, ecosystems and society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信