Stereotactic body radiation therapy for the re-irradiation of local relapse from prostate cancer: results in terms of outcomes and toxicity.

IF 1.4 4区 医学
Ciro Franzese, Raffaella Lucchini, Marco Badalamenti, Davide Baldaccini, Manuele Roghi, Luciana DI Cristina, Beatrice Marini, Mariya Ilieva, Anna Bertolini, Giuseppe Spataro, Giacomo Reggiori, Carmela Galdieri, Stefano Tomatis, Marta Scorsetti
{"title":"Stereotactic body radiation therapy for the re-irradiation of local relapse from prostate cancer: results in terms of outcomes and toxicity.","authors":"Ciro Franzese, Raffaella Lucchini, Marco Badalamenti, Davide Baldaccini, Manuele Roghi, Luciana DI Cristina, Beatrice Marini, Mariya Ilieva, Anna Bertolini, Giuseppe Spataro, Giacomo Reggiori, Carmela Galdieri, Stefano Tomatis, Marta Scorsetti","doi":"10.23736/S1824-4785.25.03565-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim is to retrospectively evaluate toxicity and outcomes of re-irradiation (re-RT) for macroscopic local relapse in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) treated with previous definitive or postoperative radiotherapy (RT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-six patients affected by local relapse after previous definitive or post-operative RT were treated with re-RT in our institute. Treatment dose was 25-30 Gy in 5 fractions. Gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity was reported according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events score version 5. Endpoints were Biochemical Relapse Free Survival (BRFS) and Distant Metastases Free Survival (DMFS), assessed with Kaplan-Meier analysis. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression was carried out to evaluate the association between clinical factors and survival outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-six patients received re-RT after definitive RT and 10 after post-operative RT. At time of re-RT median PSA was 2.57 ng/mL (range 0.23-13.10) and local relapse was detected with choline-Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) - Positron Emission Tomography (PET) or magnetic resonance imagig (MRI) in 18, 17 and one, respectively. Median Clinical Target Volume (CTV) was 17.8 cc (range 1-93.1). In 39% of patients the target corresponds to macroscopic relapse, while in 61% target was the whole prostate or prostate bed. Median follow-up was 28.2 months. No late >2 side effects were collected. Only one patient experienced GI toxicity (G2), while GU side effects were observed in eight patients (six G1 and two G2). Median BRFS survival was 19.0 months, with 1- and 2-year BRFS rates of 63.5% (95% CI 42.5-78.6) and 37.0% (95% CI 17.5-56.8), respectively. At univariate analysis, PSA value at time of re-RT was a predictive factor for BRFS (HR 1.43, 95% CI 1.19-1.73; P=0.000). DMFS rates at 1 and 2 years were 88.0% (95% CI 66.8-96.0) and 72.4% (95% CI 48.1-86.8), respectively. Median DMFS was 19.6 months in with re-RT of the relapsing nodule, while was not reached in patients treated on the whole prostate gland or surgical bed. At univariate analysis, irradiation of the macroscopic relapse vs the whole gland/bed (HR 5.91, 95% CI 1.35-25.80; P=0.018) and increasing PSA at time of re-RT (HR 1.20, 95% CI 1.01-1.41; P=0.030) were negative predictive factors. At multivariate analysis, treatment of the macroscopic relapse only remained an independent predictive factor of distant metastases free survival (DMFS) (HR 4.48, 95% CI 1.09-18.37; P=0.037).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Re-RT in patients treated previously with definitive or postoperative RT was safe and showed promising results in terms of toxicity and biochemical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":49135,"journal":{"name":"the Quarterly Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"the Quarterly Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S1824-4785.25.03565-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim is to retrospectively evaluate toxicity and outcomes of re-irradiation (re-RT) for macroscopic local relapse in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) treated with previous definitive or postoperative radiotherapy (RT).

Methods: Thirty-six patients affected by local relapse after previous definitive or post-operative RT were treated with re-RT in our institute. Treatment dose was 25-30 Gy in 5 fractions. Gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity was reported according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events score version 5. Endpoints were Biochemical Relapse Free Survival (BRFS) and Distant Metastases Free Survival (DMFS), assessed with Kaplan-Meier analysis. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression was carried out to evaluate the association between clinical factors and survival outcomes.

Results: Twenty-six patients received re-RT after definitive RT and 10 after post-operative RT. At time of re-RT median PSA was 2.57 ng/mL (range 0.23-13.10) and local relapse was detected with choline-Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) - Positron Emission Tomography (PET) or magnetic resonance imagig (MRI) in 18, 17 and one, respectively. Median Clinical Target Volume (CTV) was 17.8 cc (range 1-93.1). In 39% of patients the target corresponds to macroscopic relapse, while in 61% target was the whole prostate or prostate bed. Median follow-up was 28.2 months. No late >2 side effects were collected. Only one patient experienced GI toxicity (G2), while GU side effects were observed in eight patients (six G1 and two G2). Median BRFS survival was 19.0 months, with 1- and 2-year BRFS rates of 63.5% (95% CI 42.5-78.6) and 37.0% (95% CI 17.5-56.8), respectively. At univariate analysis, PSA value at time of re-RT was a predictive factor for BRFS (HR 1.43, 95% CI 1.19-1.73; P=0.000). DMFS rates at 1 and 2 years were 88.0% (95% CI 66.8-96.0) and 72.4% (95% CI 48.1-86.8), respectively. Median DMFS was 19.6 months in with re-RT of the relapsing nodule, while was not reached in patients treated on the whole prostate gland or surgical bed. At univariate analysis, irradiation of the macroscopic relapse vs the whole gland/bed (HR 5.91, 95% CI 1.35-25.80; P=0.018) and increasing PSA at time of re-RT (HR 1.20, 95% CI 1.01-1.41; P=0.030) were negative predictive factors. At multivariate analysis, treatment of the macroscopic relapse only remained an independent predictive factor of distant metastases free survival (DMFS) (HR 4.48, 95% CI 1.09-18.37; P=0.037).

Conclusions: Re-RT in patients treated previously with definitive or postoperative RT was safe and showed promising results in terms of toxicity and biochemical outcomes.

立体定向体放射治疗前列腺癌局部复发的再照射:结果和毒性。
背景:目的是回顾性评价再照射(re-RT)治疗前列腺癌(PCa)患者既往明确或术后放疗(RT)的宏观局部复发的毒性和结果。方法:对我院36例确诊或术后放疗后局部复发的患者进行再放疗。治疗剂量25 ~ 30 Gy,分5次。胃肠道(GI)和泌尿生殖系统(GU)毒性根据不良事件通用术语标准评分版本5进行报告。终点为无复发生存期(BRFS)和无远处转移生存期(DMFS),采用Kaplan-Meier分析评估。采用单因素和多因素Cox回归来评估临床因素与生存结果之间的关系。结果:26例患者在确诊后接受了再放疗,10例患者在术后接受了再放疗。再放疗时PSA中位数为2.57 ng/mL(范围0.23 ~ 13.10),分别有18例、17例和1例患者行胆碱-前列腺特异性膜抗原(PSMA) -正电子发射断层扫描(PET)或磁共振成像(MRI)检出局部复发。中位临床靶容积(CTV)为17.8 cc(范围1-93.1)。39%的患者标靶为宏观复发,61%的患者标靶为全前列腺或前列腺床。中位随访时间28.2个月。未发现晚期>2副作用。仅1例患者出现胃肠道毒性(G2), 8例患者出现GU副作用(6例G1, 2例G2)。中位BRFS生存期为19.0个月,1年和2年BRFS率分别为63.5% (95% CI 42.5-78.6)和37.0% (95% CI 17.5-56.8)。在单因素分析中,重新放疗时的PSA值是BRFS的预测因素(HR 1.43, 95% CI 1.19-1.73;P = 0.000)。1年和2年的DMFS率分别为88.0% (95% CI 66.8-96.0)和72.4% (95% CI 48.1-86.8)。复发结节的中位DMFS为19.6个月,而在整个前列腺或手术床上治疗的患者未达到DMFS。在单因素分析中,放疗宏观复发vs整个腺体/床(HR 5.91, 95% CI 1.35-25.80;P=0.018),重新放疗时PSA升高(HR 1.20, 95% CI 1.01-1.41;P=0.030)为阴性预测因素。在多变量分析中,宏观复发的治疗仍然是远处转移无生存(DMFS)的独立预测因素(HR 4.48, 95% CI 1.09-18.37;P = 0.037)。结论:在之前接受过明确或术后RT治疗的患者中,Re-RT是安全的,并且在毒性和生化结果方面显示出有希望的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
the Quarterly Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
the Quarterly Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
期刊介绍: The Quarterly Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging publishes scientific papers on clinical and experimental topics of nuclear medicine. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles and special articles. The journal aims to provide its readers with papers of the highest quality and impact through a process of careful peer review and editorial work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信