"Clean Addict": A "Semantic Warning Sign" and a Bridge to an Integrated Recovery Identity.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Gilad Dagan, Nehami Baum
{"title":"\"Clean Addict\": A \"Semantic Warning Sign\" and a Bridge to an Integrated Recovery Identity.","authors":"Gilad Dagan, Nehami Baum","doi":"10.1177/10497323251355119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this qualitative study, we explored how professionals specializing in the treatment of substance use disorder (SUD) perceive and use SUD-related terminology. Thirty-two professionals from diverse disciplines (social workers, psychologists, and psychiatrists) were recruited using purposive sampling. Data were collected through individual semi-structured interviews conducted in person or via Zoom, and analyzed using the reflexive thematic method, grounded in the constructivist epistemological framework. The findings revealed that professionals utilize the terms \"addict\" and \"clean addict\" and perceive them as \"semantic warning signs,\" intended to reinforce clients' vigilance by emphasizing the chronic nature of SUD. The interviewees also articulated the dual role of these terms in shaping clients' identity transition during recovery-supporting continuity of the \"addict\" identity while potentially limiting broader identity integration. These findings highlight SUD professionals' nuanced and context-sensitive approaches, as reflected in their choice of terminology, recognizing both its clinical utility and its limitations. They underscore the importance of professionals' perspectives in shaping therapeutic SUD terminology and reveal how professional terms serve as culturally embedded constructs that can carry stigmatizing connotations in some contexts while empowering recovery in others. This sheds light on the need for further cross-cultural research to explore these dynamics in diverse linguistic and cultural contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":48437,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Health Research","volume":" ","pages":"10497323251355119"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323251355119","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this qualitative study, we explored how professionals specializing in the treatment of substance use disorder (SUD) perceive and use SUD-related terminology. Thirty-two professionals from diverse disciplines (social workers, psychologists, and psychiatrists) were recruited using purposive sampling. Data were collected through individual semi-structured interviews conducted in person or via Zoom, and analyzed using the reflexive thematic method, grounded in the constructivist epistemological framework. The findings revealed that professionals utilize the terms "addict" and "clean addict" and perceive them as "semantic warning signs," intended to reinforce clients' vigilance by emphasizing the chronic nature of SUD. The interviewees also articulated the dual role of these terms in shaping clients' identity transition during recovery-supporting continuity of the "addict" identity while potentially limiting broader identity integration. These findings highlight SUD professionals' nuanced and context-sensitive approaches, as reflected in their choice of terminology, recognizing both its clinical utility and its limitations. They underscore the importance of professionals' perspectives in shaping therapeutic SUD terminology and reveal how professional terms serve as culturally embedded constructs that can carry stigmatizing connotations in some contexts while empowering recovery in others. This sheds light on the need for further cross-cultural research to explore these dynamics in diverse linguistic and cultural contexts.

“戒毒成瘾者”:一个“语义警告标志”和通往综合康复身份的桥梁。
在本定性研究中,我们探讨了专门从事物质使用障碍(SUD)治疗的专业人员如何感知和使用SUD相关术语。采用有目的的抽样方法,从不同学科(社会工作者、心理学家和精神病学家)招募了32名专业人士。通过面对面或通过Zoom进行的个人半结构化访谈收集数据,并使用基于建构主义认识论框架的反身性主题方法进行分析。研究结果显示,专业人士使用“成瘾者”和“清洁成瘾者”这两个术语,并将它们视为“语义警告标志”,旨在通过强调SUD的慢性性质来加强客户的警惕。受访者还阐述了这些术语在塑造康复期间客户身份转变方面的双重作用-支持“瘾君子”身份的连续性,同时可能限制更广泛的身份整合。这些发现突出了SUD专业人员的细致入微和上下文敏感的方法,反映在他们对术语的选择上,认识到其临床应用和局限性。他们强调了专业人士的观点在塑造治疗性SUD术语方面的重要性,并揭示了专业术语如何作为文化嵌入式结构,在某些情况下可能带有污名化的内涵,而在其他情况下则有助于康复。这表明需要进一步的跨文化研究来探索不同语言和文化背景下的这些动态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH is an international, interdisciplinary, refereed journal for the enhancement of health care and to further the development and understanding of qualitative research methods in health care settings. We welcome manuscripts in the following areas: the description and analysis of the illness experience, health and health-seeking behaviors, the experiences of caregivers, the sociocultural organization of health care, health care policy, and related topics. We also seek critical reviews and commentaries addressing conceptual, theoretical, methodological, and ethical issues pertaining to qualitative enquiry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信