Assessing Knowledge of Radiation Protection and Safety Among Undergraduate and Intern Radiologic Technologists: A Pre- and Post-Educational Course Survey.

IF 1.8 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Advances in Medical Education and Practice Pub Date : 2025-07-03 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/AMEP.S521381
Dalal Alamoudi, Mohamed Eldigire Ahmed, Amani Y Alhalwani, Alhassan Talal Alnakhli, Raghad Mohammed Qahaf, Lama Fahad Bazuhayr, Byadr Hassan Yamani
{"title":"Assessing Knowledge of Radiation Protection and Safety Among Undergraduate and Intern Radiologic Technologists: A Pre- and Post-Educational Course Survey.","authors":"Dalal Alamoudi, Mohamed Eldigire Ahmed, Amani Y Alhalwani, Alhassan Talal Alnakhli, Raghad Mohammed Qahaf, Lama Fahad Bazuhayr, Byadr Hassan Yamani","doi":"10.2147/AMEP.S521381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Radiation protection aims to reduce unnecessary exposure to ionizing radiation, protecting patients and healthcare workers. Although diagnostic imaging techniques contribute minimally to overall exposure, risks still exist. Radiologic technologists perform X-ray procedures in diverse settings, collaborating with medical teams to ensure quality patient care. The Radiological Sciences program delivers comprehensive education and clinical training in anatomy, radiation safety, patient positioning, and imaging techniques. This study assesses the effectiveness of educational interventions in enhancing students' understanding of principles of radiation physics, protection, and safety guidelines, preparing them for responsible clinical and research practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional, in-person survey was conducted among undergraduate and intern students in the Radiological Sciences Department at King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (KSAU-HS) in Jeddah. The Healthcare Professional Knowledge of Radiation Protection (HPKRP) scale was distributed via Google Forms. Data were analyzed using SPSS (v.29). Differences in HPKRP components between students' stages were examined using an unpaired samples <i>t</i>-test and ANOVA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Undergraduate students in their third and fourth years, as well as interns who completed post-educational courses, scored significantly higher than second-year students without prior coursework in medical radiation imaging. Participants with post-educational courses and training in ionizing radiation demonstrated the highest knowledge levels in radiation physics, biology, and principles of radiation use (mean: 9.2 ± 0.8), followed by radiation protection (mean: 8.9 ± 1.2). Knowledge of safe ionizing radiation use guidelines scored slightly lower (mean: 8.5 ± 1.6).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Structured radiation education significantly enhances students' knowledge of radiation physics, protection, and safety guidelines. Significant improvements were observed between the second and third academic stages, as well as among interns, with stable retention in later stages. Early integration and continuous education for promoting a strong culture of radiation safety and responsible practice across clinical and research environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":47404,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Medical Education and Practice","volume":"16 ","pages":"1151-1158"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12232937/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Medical Education and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S521381","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Radiation protection aims to reduce unnecessary exposure to ionizing radiation, protecting patients and healthcare workers. Although diagnostic imaging techniques contribute minimally to overall exposure, risks still exist. Radiologic technologists perform X-ray procedures in diverse settings, collaborating with medical teams to ensure quality patient care. The Radiological Sciences program delivers comprehensive education and clinical training in anatomy, radiation safety, patient positioning, and imaging techniques. This study assesses the effectiveness of educational interventions in enhancing students' understanding of principles of radiation physics, protection, and safety guidelines, preparing them for responsible clinical and research practices.

Methods: A cross-sectional, in-person survey was conducted among undergraduate and intern students in the Radiological Sciences Department at King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (KSAU-HS) in Jeddah. The Healthcare Professional Knowledge of Radiation Protection (HPKRP) scale was distributed via Google Forms. Data were analyzed using SPSS (v.29). Differences in HPKRP components between students' stages were examined using an unpaired samples t-test and ANOVA.

Results: Undergraduate students in their third and fourth years, as well as interns who completed post-educational courses, scored significantly higher than second-year students without prior coursework in medical radiation imaging. Participants with post-educational courses and training in ionizing radiation demonstrated the highest knowledge levels in radiation physics, biology, and principles of radiation use (mean: 9.2 ± 0.8), followed by radiation protection (mean: 8.9 ± 1.2). Knowledge of safe ionizing radiation use guidelines scored slightly lower (mean: 8.5 ± 1.6).

Conclusion: Structured radiation education significantly enhances students' knowledge of radiation physics, protection, and safety guidelines. Significant improvements were observed between the second and third academic stages, as well as among interns, with stable retention in later stages. Early integration and continuous education for promoting a strong culture of radiation safety and responsible practice across clinical and research environments.

本科及实习放射技师辐射防护与安全知识评估:教育前后课程调查。
简介:辐射防护旨在减少不必要的电离辐射暴露,保护患者和医护人员。尽管诊断成像技术对整体暴露的贡献很小,但风险仍然存在。放射技术人员在不同的环境中执行x射线程序,与医疗团队合作,以确保高质量的患者护理。放射科学课程提供解剖学、放射安全、患者体位和成像技术方面的全面教育和临床培训。本研究评估教育干预在提高学生对辐射物理原理、防护和安全指南的理解,为负责任的临床和研究实践做好准备方面的有效性。方法:对吉达沙特国王本阿卜杜勒阿齐兹健康科学大学(ksa - hs)放射科学系的本科生和实习生进行横断面面对面调查。医疗专业人员辐射防护知识(HPKRP)量表通过谷歌表格发放。使用SPSS (v.29)对数据进行分析。使用非配对样本t检验和方差分析来检验学生阶段之间HPKRP成分的差异。结果:本科三、四年级学生以及完成教育后课程的实习生的得分明显高于未完成医学放射成像课程的二年级学生。接受过电离辐射教育后课程和培训的参与者在辐射物理学、生物学和辐射使用原理方面的知识水平最高(平均值:9.2±0.8),其次是辐射防护(平均值:8.9±1.2)。对安全电离辐射使用指南的了解程度得分略低(平均值:8.5±1.6)。结论:结构化辐射教育能显著提高学生对辐射物理、防护和安全指南的认识。在第二和第三个学术阶段之间以及实习生之间观察到显著的改善,在后期阶段保持稳定。早期整合和持续教育,在临床和研究环境中促进强大的辐射安全文化和负责任的实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Medical Education and Practice
Advances in Medical Education and Practice EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
189
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信