Impacts of Homecare Investments in Alberta: Ecological and Economic Trend Analysis.

Q2 Medicine
Max Jajszczok, Cathy A Eastwood, Mingshan Lu, Ceara Cunningham, Hude Quan
{"title":"Impacts of Homecare Investments in Alberta: Ecological and Economic Trend Analysis.","authors":"Max Jajszczok, Cathy A Eastwood, Mingshan Lu, Ceara Cunningham, Hude Quan","doi":"10.12927/hcpol.2025.27616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>No standardized cost-based homecare-specific indicators are used provincially or nationally in Canada. We trended and portrayed Alberta's homecare costs and health system usage between 2015-16 and 2019-20. In addition, we conducted a cost-effectiveness ratio analysis. Total avoided acute care utilization was estimated at 346.2 thousand in-patient days. With $240.3 million in homecare investments above general growth, our cost-effectiveness ratio is 694:1. Application of these cost-based indicators reveals that homecare programs improve system cost-effectiveness. These indicators can assist health-system policy makers in understanding how systems are structured, specifically in achieving the goal of sustaining the publicly funded health system.</p>","PeriodicalId":39389,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare Policy","volume":"20 3","pages":"58-77"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12280357/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12927/hcpol.2025.27616","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

No standardized cost-based homecare-specific indicators are used provincially or nationally in Canada. We trended and portrayed Alberta's homecare costs and health system usage between 2015-16 and 2019-20. In addition, we conducted a cost-effectiveness ratio analysis. Total avoided acute care utilization was estimated at 346.2 thousand in-patient days. With $240.3 million in homecare investments above general growth, our cost-effectiveness ratio is 694:1. Application of these cost-based indicators reveals that homecare programs improve system cost-effectiveness. These indicators can assist health-system policy makers in understanding how systems are structured, specifically in achieving the goal of sustaining the publicly funded health system.

阿尔伯塔省家庭护理投资的影响:生态和经济趋势分析。
在加拿大省内或全国范围内没有使用标准化的基于成本的家庭护理具体指标。我们绘制了2015-16年至2019-20年间艾伯塔省家庭护理成本和医疗系统使用情况的趋势图。此外,我们进行了成本效益比分析。总避免急性护理利用估计为346.2万住院日。家庭护理投资2.403亿美元,高于整体增长,我们的成本效益比为694:1。这些基于成本的指标的应用表明,家庭护理计划提高了系统的成本效益。这些指标可以帮助卫生系统决策者了解系统的结构,特别是在实现维持公共资助卫生系统的目标方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Healthcare Policy
Healthcare Policy Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信