Advice or Advocacy - Varying Perceptions of Health Services and Policy Researcher Activities.

Q2 Medicine
P Alison Paprica, Walter P Wodchis, Kimberlyn M Mcgrail
{"title":"Advice or Advocacy - Varying Perceptions of Health Services and Policy Researcher Activities.","authors":"P Alison Paprica, Walter P Wodchis, Kimberlyn M Mcgrail","doi":"10.12927/hcpol.2025.27519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The line between objective advice and advocacy may be blurred for health services and policy researchers who work closely with policy makers. Our study of 22 participants' perceptions of a five-part fictional scenario in which a researcher has increasing involvement with the ministry of health found extensive variation in what participants perceived to be objective advice or advocacy. Based on this variation, we believe that health services and policy researchers cannot completely avoid the risk of being perceived as issue advocates, whether by peers or by policy makers, and suggest some possible ways to mitigate risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":39389,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare Policy","volume":"20 3","pages":"27-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12280354/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12927/hcpol.2025.27519","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The line between objective advice and advocacy may be blurred for health services and policy researchers who work closely with policy makers. Our study of 22 participants' perceptions of a five-part fictional scenario in which a researcher has increasing involvement with the ministry of health found extensive variation in what participants perceived to be objective advice or advocacy. Based on this variation, we believe that health services and policy researchers cannot completely avoid the risk of being perceived as issue advocates, whether by peers or by policy makers, and suggest some possible ways to mitigate risk.

建议或倡导-对卫生服务和政策研究人员活动的不同看法。
对于与决策者密切合作的卫生服务机构和政策研究人员来说,客观建议和宣传之间的界限可能会变得模糊。我们研究了22名参与者对一个由五部分组成的虚构场景的看法,在这个场景中,一名研究人员越来越多地参与卫生部的工作,发现参与者对客观建议或倡导的看法存在很大差异。基于这种差异,我们认为卫生服务和政策研究人员不可能完全避免被同行或政策制定者视为问题倡导者的风险,并建议一些可能的方法来减轻风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Healthcare Policy
Healthcare Policy Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信