Retrospective Study Supports that Pharmacologic Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis After Intracerebral Hemorrhage is Safe, Underused.

IF 0.9 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Camille Lh Carlisle, Tamela Stuchiner, Alexandra Lesko, John Zurasky
{"title":"Retrospective Study Supports that Pharmacologic Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis After Intracerebral Hemorrhage is Safe, Underused.","authors":"Camille Lh Carlisle, Tamela Stuchiner, Alexandra Lesko, John Zurasky","doi":"10.1177/19418744251358092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with spontaneous non-traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) have a heightened risk for venous thrombosis (VTE). The Stroke 2022 Guidelines suggest initiating pharmacologic prophylaxis after hemorrhage stabilization, as measured on repeat imaging within the first 24 hours of admission. However, pharmacologic prophylaxis is underutilized and there remain concerns that initiation of pharmacologic prophylaxis could increase hemorrhage size. This study examines the safety of initiating pharmacologic prophylaxis after hemorrhage stabilization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective study of patients discharged with nontraumatic spontaneous ICH. The study population was from Providence Medical Centers in Washington, Oregon, and California. Patients, 18 years or older, presenting to a hospital between January 2018 and December 2021 with a primary diagnosis at discharge of ICH were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 228 included, 65.4% (n = 149) received mechanical prophylaxis only and 34.6% (n = 79) received any pharmacologic prophylaxis (with or without mechanical prophylaxis). Of those patients who received any pharmacologic prophylaxis, 55.7% (44) were administered pharmacologic prophylaxis within 48 hours of stabilization. There were no significant differences in age, sex, medical history, hemorrhage type, severity, or mortality in-hospital or at 30 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There were no significant differences in VTE events and hemorrhage expansion for spontaneous ICH patients who had pharmacologic with or without mechanical prophylaxis or mechanical only, consistent with previous literature. For patients who received pharmacologic prophylaxis after stabilization, none had hemorrhage expansion; our data support the 2022 guidelines that it is safe to administer pharmacologic prophylaxis after hemorrhage stabilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":46355,"journal":{"name":"Neurohospitalist","volume":" ","pages":"19418744251358092"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12228634/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurohospitalist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19418744251358092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with spontaneous non-traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) have a heightened risk for venous thrombosis (VTE). The Stroke 2022 Guidelines suggest initiating pharmacologic prophylaxis after hemorrhage stabilization, as measured on repeat imaging within the first 24 hours of admission. However, pharmacologic prophylaxis is underutilized and there remain concerns that initiation of pharmacologic prophylaxis could increase hemorrhage size. This study examines the safety of initiating pharmacologic prophylaxis after hemorrhage stabilization.

Methods: This was a retrospective study of patients discharged with nontraumatic spontaneous ICH. The study population was from Providence Medical Centers in Washington, Oregon, and California. Patients, 18 years or older, presenting to a hospital between January 2018 and December 2021 with a primary diagnosis at discharge of ICH were included.

Results: Among the 228 included, 65.4% (n = 149) received mechanical prophylaxis only and 34.6% (n = 79) received any pharmacologic prophylaxis (with or without mechanical prophylaxis). Of those patients who received any pharmacologic prophylaxis, 55.7% (44) were administered pharmacologic prophylaxis within 48 hours of stabilization. There were no significant differences in age, sex, medical history, hemorrhage type, severity, or mortality in-hospital or at 30 days.

Conclusion: There were no significant differences in VTE events and hemorrhage expansion for spontaneous ICH patients who had pharmacologic with or without mechanical prophylaxis or mechanical only, consistent with previous literature. For patients who received pharmacologic prophylaxis after stabilization, none had hemorrhage expansion; our data support the 2022 guidelines that it is safe to administer pharmacologic prophylaxis after hemorrhage stabilization.

回顾性研究支持药理学预防脑出血后静脉血栓栓塞是安全的,未充分利用。
背景:自发性非外伤性脑出血(ICH)患者发生静脉血栓形成(VTE)的风险较高。卒中2022指南建议在出血稳定后开始药物预防,如入院前24小时内重复成像测量。然而,药物预防未得到充分利用,并且仍然存在药物预防可能增加出血大小的担忧。本研究探讨出血稳定后开始药物预防的安全性。方法:对非创伤性自发性脑出血患者进行回顾性研究。研究人群来自华盛顿州、俄勒冈州和加利福尼亚州的普罗维登斯医疗中心。纳入了2018年1月至2021年12月期间就诊并在出院时初步诊断为脑出血的18岁或以上患者。结果:在纳入的228例患者中,65.4% (n = 149)仅接受机械预防,34.6% (n = 79)接受任何药物预防(有或没有机械预防)。在接受任何药物预防的患者中,55.7%(44)的患者在病情稳定后48小时内接受了药物预防。年龄、性别、病史、出血类型、严重程度、住院或30天死亡率无显著差异。结论:自发性脑出血患者在静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)事件和出血扩张方面,在药理学上加、不加机械预防或仅加机械预防均无显著差异,与既往文献一致。在稳定后接受药物预防的患者中,没有出血扩张;我们的数据支持2022指南,即在出血稳定后进行药物预防是安全的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurohospitalist
Neurohospitalist CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
108
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信