Modelling the potential impacts of limiting vaping product sales to pharmacies.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Driss Ait Ouakrim, Tim Wilson, Samantha Howe, Jennifer Summers, Richard Edwards, Coral E Gartner, Nick Wilson, Tony Blakely
{"title":"Modelling the potential impacts of limiting vaping product sales to pharmacies.","authors":"Driss Ait Ouakrim, Tim Wilson, Samantha Howe, Jennifer Summers, Richard Edwards, Coral E Gartner, Nick Wilson, Tony Blakely","doi":"10.1136/tc-2025-059305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vaping rates are increasing globally. Restricting vaping products' access may result in net population health loss if youths who vape switch to smoking, or net gain if it promotes cessation among people who smoke. We used simulation modelling to assess how two vaping restriction policies-over-the-counter (OTC) pharmacy access or prescription-only access via general practitioners-might impact vaping and smoking rates in Aotearoa New Zealand (A/NZ).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We adapted an established Markov model of smoking and vaping, linked to a proportional multistate lifetable, to simulate the A/NZ population from 2023 to 2044. Three business-as-usual (BAU) scenarios ('low', 'medium' and 'high' vaping) were informed by youth vaping trends. Intervention impacts were derived from prior research and expert elicitation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with the medium BAU scenario with 50% vaping among 18-24-year olds by 2044, restricting to OTC pharmacy access reduced vaping prevalence by 6% and increased health-adjusted life years (HALYs). Only under the 'high' BAU scenario (60% vaping) did interventions marginally increase smoking (2% for OTC). Both interventions averted premature deaths and produced HALY gains.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Our model suggests modest reductions in vaping prevalence and net health gains from the OTC pharmacy policy, with minor benefits from a prescription-only approach. These findings underscore the importance of balancing the potential smoking cessation benefits of vaping with the need to curb youth uptake. Future research is required to better understand how vaping restriction policies could impact vaping and smoking dynamics in A/NZ, in particular, considering how illicit supply may impact policy effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":23145,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Control","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tobacco Control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/tc-2025-059305","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Vaping rates are increasing globally. Restricting vaping products' access may result in net population health loss if youths who vape switch to smoking, or net gain if it promotes cessation among people who smoke. We used simulation modelling to assess how two vaping restriction policies-over-the-counter (OTC) pharmacy access or prescription-only access via general practitioners-might impact vaping and smoking rates in Aotearoa New Zealand (A/NZ).

Methods: We adapted an established Markov model of smoking and vaping, linked to a proportional multistate lifetable, to simulate the A/NZ population from 2023 to 2044. Three business-as-usual (BAU) scenarios ('low', 'medium' and 'high' vaping) were informed by youth vaping trends. Intervention impacts were derived from prior research and expert elicitation.

Results: Compared with the medium BAU scenario with 50% vaping among 18-24-year olds by 2044, restricting to OTC pharmacy access reduced vaping prevalence by 6% and increased health-adjusted life years (HALYs). Only under the 'high' BAU scenario (60% vaping) did interventions marginally increase smoking (2% for OTC). Both interventions averted premature deaths and produced HALY gains.

Interpretation: Our model suggests modest reductions in vaping prevalence and net health gains from the OTC pharmacy policy, with minor benefits from a prescription-only approach. These findings underscore the importance of balancing the potential smoking cessation benefits of vaping with the need to curb youth uptake. Future research is required to better understand how vaping restriction policies could impact vaping and smoking dynamics in A/NZ, in particular, considering how illicit supply may impact policy effectiveness.

模拟限制电子烟产品在药店销售的潜在影响。
背景:全球吸电子烟的比例正在上升。如果吸电子烟的年轻人转而吸烟,限制电子烟产品的获取可能会导致人口健康的净损失,如果它促进吸烟者戒烟,可能会导致净收益。我们使用模拟模型来评估两项电子烟限制政策——非处方(OTC)药房获取或通过全科医生仅处方获取——如何影响新西兰奥特罗阿(A/NZ)的电子烟和吸烟率。方法:我们采用了一个已建立的吸烟和电子烟的马尔可夫模型,并将其与比例多状态生命表相关联,以模拟2023年至2044年的a /NZ人口。根据年轻人吸电子烟的趋势,有三种情况(“低”、“中”和“高”)。干预的影响来源于先前的研究和专家的启发。结果:与到2044年18-24岁人群吸电子烟率为50%的中等BAU情景相比,限制OTC药房可使吸电子烟率降低6%,并增加健康调整生命年(HALYs)。只有在“高”BAU情况下(60%的电子烟),干预措施才会略微增加吸烟(非处方药为2%)。这两种干预措施都避免了过早死亡,并产生了HALY收益。解释:我们的模型表明,非处方药房政策适度降低了电子烟的流行程度和净健康收益,仅处方方法的好处很小。这些发现强调了平衡电子烟的潜在戒烟益处和抑制青少年吸电子烟的必要性的重要性。未来的研究需要更好地了解电子烟限制政策如何影响A/新西兰的电子烟和吸烟动态,特别是考虑到非法供应如何影响政策有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tobacco Control
Tobacco Control 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
26.90%
发文量
223
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Tobacco Control is an international peer-reviewed journal covering the nature and consequences of tobacco use worldwide; tobacco''s effects on population health, the economy, the environment, and society; efforts to prevent and control the global tobacco epidemic through population-level education and policy changes; the ethical dimensions of tobacco control policies; and the activities of the tobacco industry and its allies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信