{"title":"Sleep in patients with traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of actigraphy studies.","authors":"Qiang Zong, Xiao Li, Chao Sun, Hanrong Cheng, Shirley Xin Li","doi":"10.1093/sleep/zsaf175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study objectives: </strong>Sleep disturbances are common in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Actigraphy can provide an objective and naturalistic assessment of sleep patterns in patients with TBI. Yet, the evidence of objective sleep-wake abnormalities using actigraphy in this clinical population remained unclear. To explore whether there might be differences in actigraphy-based sleep measures between patients with TBI and controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An electronic systematic literature search was conducted using the following databases: PubMed, EMBASE, and PsycINFO, from inception to December 2023. Studies that used actigraphy to measure sleep-wake patterns objectively in patients with TBI and controls were included. Actigraphy-based sleep measures, including nighttime and 24-h total sleep time (TST), sleep onset latency (SOL), wake after sleep onset (WASO), sleep efficiency (SE), and their night-to-night variability were extracted and synthesized. Effect sizes for actigraphy-assessed sleep measures were calculated and presented as the mean differences (MDs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three studies involving 881 patients with TBI and 769 controls were included. Compared to controls, patients with TBI showed significantly longer SOL, more WASO, poorer sleep efficiency, and increased night-to-night variability in TST and WASO.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with TBI demonstrated abnormalities in several actigraphy-assessed sleep measures compared with controls. The findings underscored the importance of developing target sleep interventions, particularly focusing on addressing night-to-night sleep variability, to meet the specific needs of this clinical population.</p>","PeriodicalId":22018,"journal":{"name":"Sleep","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsaf175","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Study objectives: Sleep disturbances are common in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Actigraphy can provide an objective and naturalistic assessment of sleep patterns in patients with TBI. Yet, the evidence of objective sleep-wake abnormalities using actigraphy in this clinical population remained unclear. To explore whether there might be differences in actigraphy-based sleep measures between patients with TBI and controls.
Methods: An electronic systematic literature search was conducted using the following databases: PubMed, EMBASE, and PsycINFO, from inception to December 2023. Studies that used actigraphy to measure sleep-wake patterns objectively in patients with TBI and controls were included. Actigraphy-based sleep measures, including nighttime and 24-h total sleep time (TST), sleep onset latency (SOL), wake after sleep onset (WASO), sleep efficiency (SE), and their night-to-night variability were extracted and synthesized. Effect sizes for actigraphy-assessed sleep measures were calculated and presented as the mean differences (MDs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs).
Results: Twenty-three studies involving 881 patients with TBI and 769 controls were included. Compared to controls, patients with TBI showed significantly longer SOL, more WASO, poorer sleep efficiency, and increased night-to-night variability in TST and WASO.
Conclusions: Patients with TBI demonstrated abnormalities in several actigraphy-assessed sleep measures compared with controls. The findings underscored the importance of developing target sleep interventions, particularly focusing on addressing night-to-night sleep variability, to meet the specific needs of this clinical population.
期刊介绍:
SLEEP® publishes findings from studies conducted at any level of analysis, including:
Genes
Molecules
Cells
Physiology
Neural systems and circuits
Behavior and cognition
Self-report
SLEEP® publishes articles that use a wide variety of scientific approaches and address a broad range of topics. These may include, but are not limited to:
Basic and neuroscience studies of sleep and circadian mechanisms
In vitro and animal models of sleep, circadian rhythms, and human disorders
Pre-clinical human investigations, including the measurement and manipulation of sleep and circadian rhythms
Studies in clinical or population samples. These may address factors influencing sleep and circadian rhythms (e.g., development and aging, and social and environmental influences) and relationships between sleep, circadian rhythms, health, and disease
Clinical trials, epidemiology studies, implementation, and dissemination research.