{"title":"Association between dietary copper intake and cognitive function in American older adults: NHANES 2011-2014.","authors":"Weiai Jia, Kangsheng Zhu, Jingpu Shi, Fangfang Yong","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-09280-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This cross-sectional observational study examined the association between dietary copper intake and cognitive function in American older adults, using data from the 2011 to 2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Analyzing a total of 2420 participants, dietary copper intake was determined by averaging two 24-h dietary recalls, whereas cognitive function was assessed by the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), the Animal Fluency Test (AFT), a Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's disease (CERAD) subtest and global cognition Z score. Multivariate linear regression models were used to explore the association between copper levels and cognitive function. Higher copper intake was associated with higher cognitive scores. In the fully adjusted model, compared to the lowest quartile (Q1), the highest quartile (Q4) of copper intake was associated with related to higher cognitive scores (DSST: β = 3.80, 95% CI 1.90,5.70; AFT: β = 1.23, 95% CI 0.48,1.99; CERAD-IRT: β = 0.58, 95% CI - 0.06,1.22; CERAD-DRT: β = 0.47, 95% CI 0.15,0.80; Z score: β = 0.20, 95% CI 0.10,0.29), particularly in participants with a history of stroke. Multivariate smooth spline analysis revealed that dietary copper intake was related to DSST, AFT and Z score in an inverted L-shaped nonlinear manner. The inflection point of copper was 1.63 mg/day for DSST, 1.42 mg/day for AFT and 1.22 mg/day for the Z score. Further longitudinal research is necessary to substantiate these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"24334"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12234787/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-09280-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This cross-sectional observational study examined the association between dietary copper intake and cognitive function in American older adults, using data from the 2011 to 2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Analyzing a total of 2420 participants, dietary copper intake was determined by averaging two 24-h dietary recalls, whereas cognitive function was assessed by the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), the Animal Fluency Test (AFT), a Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's disease (CERAD) subtest and global cognition Z score. Multivariate linear regression models were used to explore the association between copper levels and cognitive function. Higher copper intake was associated with higher cognitive scores. In the fully adjusted model, compared to the lowest quartile (Q1), the highest quartile (Q4) of copper intake was associated with related to higher cognitive scores (DSST: β = 3.80, 95% CI 1.90,5.70; AFT: β = 1.23, 95% CI 0.48,1.99; CERAD-IRT: β = 0.58, 95% CI - 0.06,1.22; CERAD-DRT: β = 0.47, 95% CI 0.15,0.80; Z score: β = 0.20, 95% CI 0.10,0.29), particularly in participants with a history of stroke. Multivariate smooth spline analysis revealed that dietary copper intake was related to DSST, AFT and Z score in an inverted L-shaped nonlinear manner. The inflection point of copper was 1.63 mg/day for DSST, 1.42 mg/day for AFT and 1.22 mg/day for the Z score. Further longitudinal research is necessary to substantiate these findings.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.