EXPRESS: Now That I See it Your Way, I Choose You: Visuo-Spatial Perspective-Taking Affects Partner Selection During Coalition Formation.

IF 1.5 3区 心理学 Q4 PHYSIOLOGY
Anabela Cantiani, Ilja van Beest, Thorsten Erle
{"title":"EXPRESS: Now That I See it Your Way, I Choose You: Visuo-Spatial Perspective-Taking Affects Partner Selection During Coalition Formation.","authors":"Anabela Cantiani, Ilja van Beest, Thorsten Erle","doi":"10.1177/17470218251358231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Humans constantly form coalitions to achieve shared goals, and current theories of coalition formation assume that this process is solely guided by economic incentives. However, this assumption neglects the importance of psychological processes that contribute to coalition formation, which is especially problematic in scenarios where economic motives of potential partners are (initially) indistinguishable. This research investigates the impact of one psychological process, visuo-spatial perspective-taking (VPT), on coalition formation. We hypothesized that adopting the perspective of a potential coalition partner increases the likelihood of forming a coalition with them, compared to partners viewed from an egocentric standpoint. Importantly, this is not because this person is economically more advantageous, but because perspective-taking increases liking for and similarity to others. These effects, however, stem from an embodied simulation of physical closeness that only some participants (embodiers) but not others (disembodiers) engage in, suggesting a moderation of this preference by perspective-taking strategy. Across five experiments (N = 2340), participants completed a VPT task before engaging in a hypothetical coalition formation negotiation with the targets presented during the VPT task. Meta-analytically, our data suggests that embodiers indeed showed increased liking and similarity after perspective-taking, while disembodiers did not. However, unexpectedly not only embodiers, but also disembodiers selected partners whose perspective they took more often as a coalition partner. We discuss potential explanations for this preference in disembodiers, implications of our work for theories of coalition formation, and for research on different strategies for perspective-taking.</p>","PeriodicalId":20869,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"17470218251358231"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218251358231","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Humans constantly form coalitions to achieve shared goals, and current theories of coalition formation assume that this process is solely guided by economic incentives. However, this assumption neglects the importance of psychological processes that contribute to coalition formation, which is especially problematic in scenarios where economic motives of potential partners are (initially) indistinguishable. This research investigates the impact of one psychological process, visuo-spatial perspective-taking (VPT), on coalition formation. We hypothesized that adopting the perspective of a potential coalition partner increases the likelihood of forming a coalition with them, compared to partners viewed from an egocentric standpoint. Importantly, this is not because this person is economically more advantageous, but because perspective-taking increases liking for and similarity to others. These effects, however, stem from an embodied simulation of physical closeness that only some participants (embodiers) but not others (disembodiers) engage in, suggesting a moderation of this preference by perspective-taking strategy. Across five experiments (N = 2340), participants completed a VPT task before engaging in a hypothetical coalition formation negotiation with the targets presented during the VPT task. Meta-analytically, our data suggests that embodiers indeed showed increased liking and similarity after perspective-taking, while disembodiers did not. However, unexpectedly not only embodiers, but also disembodiers selected partners whose perspective they took more often as a coalition partner. We discuss potential explanations for this preference in disembodiers, implications of our work for theories of coalition formation, and for research on different strategies for perspective-taking.

表达:既然我以你的方式看待它,我选择你:在联盟形成过程中,视觉空间换位思考影响伙伴选择。
人类不断结成联盟以实现共同的目标,目前的联盟形成理论认为,这一过程完全受经济激励的指导。然而,这一假设忽略了促成联盟形成的心理过程的重要性,这在潜在合作伙伴的经济动机(最初)难以区分的情况下尤其成问题。本研究探讨了一个心理过程,视觉空间换位思考(VPT)对联盟形成的影响。我们假设,与以自我为中心的观点相比,采用潜在联盟伙伴的观点会增加与他们结成联盟的可能性。重要的是,这并不是因为这个人在经济上更有优势,而是因为换位思考会增加对他人的好感和相似性。然而,这些影响源于身体亲近的具体化模拟,只有一些参与者(体现者)而不是其他人(非体现者)参与其中,这表明这种偏好通过换位思考策略得到了缓和。在五个实验中(N = 2340),参与者在与VPT任务中出现的目标进行假设的联盟形成谈判之前完成了一个VPT任务。荟萃分析表明,我们的数据表明,在换位思考后,化身者确实表现出了更多的喜欢和相似度,而非化身者则没有。然而,出乎意料的是,不仅实体化者,而且非实体化者也选择了他们更经常将其观点作为联盟伙伴的合作伙伴。我们讨论了对脱体者这种偏好的潜在解释,我们的工作对联盟形成理论的影响,以及对不同换位思考策略的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
178
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Promoting the interests of scientific psychology and its researchers, QJEP, the journal of the Experimental Psychology Society, is a leading journal with a long-standing tradition of publishing cutting-edge research. Several articles have become classic papers in the fields of attention, perception, learning, memory, language, and reasoning. The journal publishes original articles on any topic within the field of experimental psychology (including comparative research). These include substantial experimental reports, review papers, rapid communications (reporting novel techniques or ground breaking results), comments (on articles previously published in QJEP or on issues of general interest to experimental psychologists), and book reviews. Experimental results are welcomed from all relevant techniques, including behavioural testing, brain imaging and computational modelling. QJEP offers a competitive publication time-scale. Accepted Rapid Communications have priority in the publication cycle and usually appear in print within three months. We aim to publish all accepted (but uncorrected) articles online within seven days. Our Latest Articles page offers immediate publication of articles upon reaching their final form. The journal offers an open access option called Open Select, enabling authors to meet funder requirements to make their article free to read online for all in perpetuity. Authors also benefit from a broad and diverse subscription base that delivers the journal contents to a world-wide readership. Together these features ensure that the journal offers authors the opportunity to raise the visibility of their work to a global audience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信