Sophie Zhu, Kentaro Abe, Cora Hoover, Erin L Murray, Lauren J Stockman
{"title":"Evaluation of the Rubella Surveillance System, California, 2018-2022.","authors":"Sophie Zhu, Kentaro Abe, Cora Hoover, Erin L Murray, Lauren J Stockman","doi":"10.1177/00333549251320018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Rubella prevalence in the United States is low, and many positive immunoglobulin M (IgM) test results are likely false positive. We evaluated case classification and follow-up time spent on rubella-positive IgM test results from routine surveillance by the California Department of Public Health (CDPH).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified and abstracted data from rubella reports submitted to CDPH during January 1, 2018-December 31, 2022. CDPH uses a modified version of the 2013 Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists (CSTE) rubella case definition to determine cases. The percentage of confirmed cases was the proportion of cases determined via CDPH's modification over reports adhering to the CSTE rubella case definition, calculated by test type and reason. We surveyed local public health staff to estimate person-time spent on report follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 801 suspected rubella reports. After investigation, CDPH confirmed 4 as cases and 797 as not cases; 467 (58.3%) were erroneously tested on the basis of test reason (immunity screening or ordered in error). Overall, 745 (93.0%) reports had IgM test results, 33 (4.1%) had an unknown test type, and 23 (2.9%) had a polymerase chain reaction test. Most erroneous reports (93.4%, 436/467) included only an IgM-positive test result. Mean time spent to investigate a suspected rubella report was 3.2 hours (range, <1-14.5 h).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most erroneous rubella reports submitted to CDPH during 2018-2022 included a positive IgM test result, highlighting limitations of using IgM test results to classify rubella cases. The CSTE rubella case definition should be revised to ensure consistent interpretation and classification of confirmed rubella cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":20793,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Reports","volume":" ","pages":"333549251320018"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12237986/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00333549251320018","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Rubella prevalence in the United States is low, and many positive immunoglobulin M (IgM) test results are likely false positive. We evaluated case classification and follow-up time spent on rubella-positive IgM test results from routine surveillance by the California Department of Public Health (CDPH).
Methods: We identified and abstracted data from rubella reports submitted to CDPH during January 1, 2018-December 31, 2022. CDPH uses a modified version of the 2013 Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists (CSTE) rubella case definition to determine cases. The percentage of confirmed cases was the proportion of cases determined via CDPH's modification over reports adhering to the CSTE rubella case definition, calculated by test type and reason. We surveyed local public health staff to estimate person-time spent on report follow-up.
Results: We identified 801 suspected rubella reports. After investigation, CDPH confirmed 4 as cases and 797 as not cases; 467 (58.3%) were erroneously tested on the basis of test reason (immunity screening or ordered in error). Overall, 745 (93.0%) reports had IgM test results, 33 (4.1%) had an unknown test type, and 23 (2.9%) had a polymerase chain reaction test. Most erroneous reports (93.4%, 436/467) included only an IgM-positive test result. Mean time spent to investigate a suspected rubella report was 3.2 hours (range, <1-14.5 h).
Conclusions: Most erroneous rubella reports submitted to CDPH during 2018-2022 included a positive IgM test result, highlighting limitations of using IgM test results to classify rubella cases. The CSTE rubella case definition should be revised to ensure consistent interpretation and classification of confirmed rubella cases.
期刊介绍：
Public Health Reports is the official journal of the Office of the U.S. Surgeon General and the U.S. Public Health Service and has been published since 1878. It is published bimonthly, plus supplement issues, through an official agreement with the Association of Schools and Programs of Public Health. The journal is peer-reviewed and publishes original research and commentaries in the areas of public health practice and methodology, original research, public health law, and public health schools and teaching. Issues contain regular commentaries by the U.S. Surgeon General and executives of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Health.
The journal focuses upon such topics as tobacco control, teenage violence, occupational disease and injury, immunization, drug policy, lead screening, health disparities, and many other key and emerging public health issues. In addition to the six regular issues, PHR produces supplemental issues approximately 2-5 times per year which focus on specific topics that are of particular interest to our readership. The journal''s contributors are on the front line of public health and they present their work in a readable and accessible format.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
