Establishing a Maternal Health Task Force: Lessons Learned From Illinois, North Carolina, and Ohio, 2019-2024.

IF 3 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Abigail Holicky, Allison Stevens, Rebecca Severin, Rashelle Ghanem, Hallie Kerr, Ushma Mehta, Lily Stevens, Arden Handler
{"title":"Establishing a Maternal Health Task Force: Lessons Learned From Illinois, North Carolina, and Ohio, 2019-2024.","authors":"Abigail Holicky, Allison Stevens, Rebecca Severin, Rashelle Ghanem, Hallie Kerr, Ushma Mehta, Lily Stevens, Arden Handler","doi":"10.1177/00333549251320955","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 2019, the Health Resources and Services Administration provided funding to 9 states to implement a State Maternal Health Innovation Program, which required development of a state-level Maternal Health Task Force (MHTF) and an associated Maternal Health Strategic Plan (MHSP) in each recipient state. This case study presents perspectives of the development and implementation of MHTFs in 3 funded states: Illinois, North Carolina, and Ohio. Each state used a different approach for MHTF administration: public university staff (Illinois), contracted staff (North Carolina), and state public health department staff (Ohio). To create the MHTFs, all states leveraged existing partnerships and sought new connections to ensure a multidiscplinary membership. To construct its MHSP, each state used data and recommendations from its Maternal Mortality Review Committee, existing state-level maternal health action plans and data, other maternal health initiatives, and knowledge from MHTF members. Topics addressed by all 3 MHSPs included public education on maternal health issues, training for health care providers, expansion of the perinatal workforce, and expansion and restructuring of mental health and substance use services. Common challenges for MHTFs and MHSPs that emerged across the states included engaging membership, determining the scope of activities, and demonstrating effectiveness of the MHTF. Despite the launch of MHTFs during the COVID-19 pandemic, all 3 states successfully created MHSPs, retained mostly volunteer members, and have continued to demonstrate progress on activities identified in their MHSPs. Funding is vital for success; merging MHTFs with other state-level efforts may be prudent to reduce the time burden on members, create synergy, and ensure sustainability.</p>","PeriodicalId":20793,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Reports","volume":" ","pages":"333549251320955"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12237955/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00333549251320955","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2019, the Health Resources and Services Administration provided funding to 9 states to implement a State Maternal Health Innovation Program, which required development of a state-level Maternal Health Task Force (MHTF) and an associated Maternal Health Strategic Plan (MHSP) in each recipient state. This case study presents perspectives of the development and implementation of MHTFs in 3 funded states: Illinois, North Carolina, and Ohio. Each state used a different approach for MHTF administration: public university staff (Illinois), contracted staff (North Carolina), and state public health department staff (Ohio). To create the MHTFs, all states leveraged existing partnerships and sought new connections to ensure a multidiscplinary membership. To construct its MHSP, each state used data and recommendations from its Maternal Mortality Review Committee, existing state-level maternal health action plans and data, other maternal health initiatives, and knowledge from MHTF members. Topics addressed by all 3 MHSPs included public education on maternal health issues, training for health care providers, expansion of the perinatal workforce, and expansion and restructuring of mental health and substance use services. Common challenges for MHTFs and MHSPs that emerged across the states included engaging membership, determining the scope of activities, and demonstrating effectiveness of the MHTF. Despite the launch of MHTFs during the COVID-19 pandemic, all 3 states successfully created MHSPs, retained mostly volunteer members, and have continued to demonstrate progress on activities identified in their MHSPs. Funding is vital for success; merging MHTFs with other state-level efforts may be prudent to reduce the time burden on members, create synergy, and ensure sustainability.

建立孕产妇健康工作组:2019-2024年伊利诺伊州、北卡罗来纳州和俄亥俄州的经验教训。
2019年,卫生资源和服务管理局向9个州提供资金,以实施一项州孕产妇保健创新计划,该计划要求在每个受援国建立一个国家级孕产妇保健工作组(MHTF)和相关的孕产妇保健战略计划(MHSP)。本案例研究展示了在伊利诺斯州、北卡罗来纳州和俄亥俄州这三个受资助的州开发和实施mhtf的前景。每个州使用不同的方法管理MHTF:公立大学工作人员(伊利诺伊州)、合同制工作人员(北卡罗来纳州)和州公共卫生部门工作人员(俄亥俄州)。为了创建mhtf,所有国家都利用现有的伙伴关系并寻求新的联系,以确保多学科的成员资格。为了构建其MHSP,每个州都使用了其孕产妇死亡率审查委员会的数据和建议、现有的州一级孕产妇保健行动计划和数据、其他孕产妇保健倡议以及孕产妇保健基金成员的知识。所有3个卫生保健服务提供者讨论的主题包括关于产妇保健问题的公共教育、对保健提供者的培训、扩大围产期工作队伍以及扩大和改组精神卫生和药物使用服务。各州出现的MHTF和mhsp面临的共同挑战包括吸引成员、确定活动范围和展示MHTF的有效性。尽管在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间启动了mhtf,但所有三个州都成功创建了mhsp,保留了大部分志愿成员,并继续在其mhsp中确定的活动方面取得进展。资金对成功至关重要;将mhtf与其他州一级的努力合并可能是谨慎的,以减少成员的时间负担,创造协同效应并确保可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Public Health Reports
Public Health Reports 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
6.10%
发文量
164
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Public Health Reports is the official journal of the Office of the U.S. Surgeon General and the U.S. Public Health Service and has been published since 1878. It is published bimonthly, plus supplement issues, through an official agreement with the Association of Schools and Programs of Public Health. The journal is peer-reviewed and publishes original research and commentaries in the areas of public health practice and methodology, original research, public health law, and public health schools and teaching. Issues contain regular commentaries by the U.S. Surgeon General and executives of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Health. The journal focuses upon such topics as tobacco control, teenage violence, occupational disease and injury, immunization, drug policy, lead screening, health disparities, and many other key and emerging public health issues. In addition to the six regular issues, PHR produces supplemental issues approximately 2-5 times per year which focus on specific topics that are of particular interest to our readership. The journal''s contributors are on the front line of public health and they present their work in a readable and accessible format.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信