Single-Step Universal First-Trimester Cytomegalovirus Screening and Valacyclovir Prophylaxis in Pregnancy: A Cost-Utility Analysis in a High Seroprevalence Setting.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Prenatal Diagnosis Pub Date : 2025-07-08 DOI:10.1002/pd.6848
Zhi Zhen Lim, Clarence Ong, Ching Yee Chan, Kee Thai Yeo, Wei Yee Wan, Jerry Kok Yen Chan, Wei Ching Tan, Lay Kok Tan, Pamela Palasanthiran, Yi Wang, Liying Yang
{"title":"Single-Step Universal First-Trimester Cytomegalovirus Screening and Valacyclovir Prophylaxis in Pregnancy: A Cost-Utility Analysis in a High Seroprevalence Setting.","authors":"Zhi Zhen Lim, Clarence Ong, Ching Yee Chan, Kee Thai Yeo, Wei Yee Wan, Jerry Kok Yen Chan, Wei Ching Tan, Lay Kok Tan, Pamela Palasanthiran, Yi Wang, Liying Yang","doi":"10.1002/pd.6848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of first trimester single-step universal cytomegalovirus (CMV) serological screening with valacyclovir as vertical transmission prophylaxis versus routine ultrasound-directed testing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A payer perspective cost-utility analysis was conducted on a hypothetical population of 100,000 pregnant women for a time horizon of 9 month of full-term pregnancy and the lifetime of children. Using a decision-tree and Markov model, we assessed quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained by preventing congenital CMV (cCMV) sequelae against the costs of universal screening and valacyclovir prophylaxis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ICER for universal screening strategy was USD125,864 (SGD170,087)/QALY-gained compared to routine ultrasound-directed testing. It prevented approximately 54 cCMV infections, 18 cases of symptomatic infections, and 17 cases of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) and cognitive impairment by age of 5 per 100,000 mothers screened. The primary factors influencing cost-effectiveness include the effectiveness of VCV in preventing vertical CMV transmission, the prevalence of primary CMV infection during pregnancy, the probability of symptomatic congenital CMV following periconceptional infection, and the cost of serological testing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although the ICER of universal CMV screening appears high in absolute terms, it compares favorably with ICER of commonly offered antenatal screening methods such as first trimester non-invasive prenatal testing for women at intermediate risk of Trisomy 21. Universal screening has the potential for averting childhood morbidity at birth and by 5-years-old. Important variables influencing the ICER include the effectiveness of valacyclovir in preventing vertical transmission, prevalence of primary CMV infection, probability of symptomatic cCMV after periconception primary infection and cost of serology tests.</p>","PeriodicalId":20387,"journal":{"name":"Prenatal Diagnosis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prenatal Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.6848","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of first trimester single-step universal cytomegalovirus (CMV) serological screening with valacyclovir as vertical transmission prophylaxis versus routine ultrasound-directed testing.

Methods: A payer perspective cost-utility analysis was conducted on a hypothetical population of 100,000 pregnant women for a time horizon of 9 month of full-term pregnancy and the lifetime of children. Using a decision-tree and Markov model, we assessed quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained by preventing congenital CMV (cCMV) sequelae against the costs of universal screening and valacyclovir prophylaxis.

Results: The ICER for universal screening strategy was USD125,864 (SGD170,087)/QALY-gained compared to routine ultrasound-directed testing. It prevented approximately 54 cCMV infections, 18 cases of symptomatic infections, and 17 cases of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) and cognitive impairment by age of 5 per 100,000 mothers screened. The primary factors influencing cost-effectiveness include the effectiveness of VCV in preventing vertical CMV transmission, the prevalence of primary CMV infection during pregnancy, the probability of symptomatic congenital CMV following periconceptional infection, and the cost of serological testing.

Conclusions: Although the ICER of universal CMV screening appears high in absolute terms, it compares favorably with ICER of commonly offered antenatal screening methods such as first trimester non-invasive prenatal testing for women at intermediate risk of Trisomy 21. Universal screening has the potential for averting childhood morbidity at birth and by 5-years-old. Important variables influencing the ICER include the effectiveness of valacyclovir in preventing vertical transmission, prevalence of primary CMV infection, probability of symptomatic cCMV after periconception primary infection and cost of serology tests.

单步通用妊娠早期巨细胞病毒筛查和伐昔洛韦预防:在高血清阳性率设置的成本-效用分析。
目的:评价用伐昔洛韦进行妊娠早期单步通用巨细胞病毒(CMV)血清学筛查与常规超声定向检测的成本-效果。方法:从支付方角度对10万名孕妇进行成本效用分析,时间跨度为9个月的足月妊娠和孩子的一生。使用决策树和马尔可夫模型,我们评估了通过预防先天性巨细胞病毒(cCMV)后遗症获得的质量调整生命年(QALYs)与普遍筛查和伐昔洛韦预防的成本。结果:与常规超声定向检测相比,通用筛查策略的ICER为125,864美元(170,087新元)/质量。它预防了大约54例cCMV感染,18例症状性感染,以及17例感音神经性听力损失(SNHL)和认知障碍(每10万名筛查的5岁母亲)。影响成本-效果的主要因素包括VCV预防巨细胞病毒垂直传播的有效性、妊娠期原发性巨细胞病毒感染的患病率、围孕期感染后出现先天性巨细胞病毒症状的概率以及血清学检测的成本。结论:尽管通用巨细胞病毒筛查的ICER绝对值较高,但与常用的产前筛查方法(如对21三体中度风险妇女的妊娠早期无创产前检查)的ICER相比,它更有利。普遍筛查有可能避免出生时和5岁前的儿童发病率。影响ICER的重要变量包括:伐昔洛韦预防垂直传播的有效性、原发性巨细胞病毒感染的患病率、妊娠期原发性感染后出现症状性巨细胞病毒的概率以及血清学检测的费用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Prenatal Diagnosis
Prenatal Diagnosis 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
204
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Prenatal Diagnosis welcomes submissions in all aspects of prenatal diagnosis with a particular focus on areas in which molecular biology and genetics interface with prenatal care and therapy, encompassing: all aspects of fetal imaging, including sonography and magnetic resonance imaging; prenatal cytogenetics, including molecular studies and array CGH; prenatal screening studies; fetal cells and cell-free nucleic acids in maternal blood and other fluids; preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD); prenatal diagnosis of single gene disorders, including metabolic disorders; fetal therapy; fetal and placental development and pathology; development and evaluation of laboratory services for prenatal diagnosis; psychosocial, legal, ethical and economic aspects of prenatal diagnosis; prenatal genetic counseling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信