EXPRESS: Robots to the Rescue: Robot Discouragement Reduces Young Adults' Risk-Taking.

IF 1.5 3区 心理学 Q4 PHYSIOLOGY
Michaela Gummerum, Yaniv Hanoch, Daniel Hernandez Garcia, Angelo Cangelosi
{"title":"EXPRESS: Robots to the Rescue: Robot Discouragement Reduces Young Adults' Risk-Taking.","authors":"Michaela Gummerum, Yaniv Hanoch, Daniel Hernandez Garcia, Angelo Cangelosi","doi":"10.1177/17470218251359985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A large body of evidence shows that peer pressure can increase risky behaviour, with more limited evidence indicating that peer pressure can also reduce risky behaviour. However, whether robots can extract similar influence is an open and important question. To study this problem, 172 participants completed the balloon analogue risk task (BART) under three conditions: Control (no robot present), the presence of an encouraging robot, and the presence of a discouraging robot. Participants also completed a self-report measure evaluating their risk attitude and one designed to assess attitudes toward robots. Our data revealed that participants in the robot-discouraging condition exhibited significantly reduced risky behaviours compared to those in the robot-encouraging and control conditions. They pumped significantly fewer times, experienced significantly fewer balloon explosions, and earned significantly less money compared to the control or encouraged condition. However, we did not find a significant effect between encouraging and the control conditions. Moreover, a more positive impression of the robot increased the effect of the robot's discouraging statements on risk-taking. The results of our study open new possibilities for the employment of robots in preventive programs designed to reduce or alter risky behaviour.</p>","PeriodicalId":20869,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"17470218251359985"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218251359985","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A large body of evidence shows that peer pressure can increase risky behaviour, with more limited evidence indicating that peer pressure can also reduce risky behaviour. However, whether robots can extract similar influence is an open and important question. To study this problem, 172 participants completed the balloon analogue risk task (BART) under three conditions: Control (no robot present), the presence of an encouraging robot, and the presence of a discouraging robot. Participants also completed a self-report measure evaluating their risk attitude and one designed to assess attitudes toward robots. Our data revealed that participants in the robot-discouraging condition exhibited significantly reduced risky behaviours compared to those in the robot-encouraging and control conditions. They pumped significantly fewer times, experienced significantly fewer balloon explosions, and earned significantly less money compared to the control or encouraged condition. However, we did not find a significant effect between encouraging and the control conditions. Moreover, a more positive impression of the robot increased the effect of the robot's discouraging statements on risk-taking. The results of our study open new possibilities for the employment of robots in preventive programs designed to reduce or alter risky behaviour.

快递:机器人来拯救:机器人的沮丧减少了年轻人的冒险。
大量证据表明,同伴压力会增加危险行为,但更有限的证据表明,同伴压力也能减少危险行为。然而,机器人是否能获得类似的影响是一个开放而重要的问题。为了研究这个问题,172名参与者在三种条件下完成了气球模拟风险任务(BART):控制(没有机器人在场),存在鼓励机器人,存在沮丧机器人。参与者还完成了一份自我报告,评估他们对风险的态度,以及一份评估他们对机器人的态度。我们的数据显示,与机器人鼓励和控制条件下的参与者相比,机器人沮丧条件下的参与者表现出的危险行为显著减少。与对照组或鼓励组相比,他们抽气的次数明显减少,气球爆炸的次数明显减少,赚的钱也明显减少。然而,我们没有发现激励条件和控制条件之间的显著影响。此外,对机器人更积极的印象会增加机器人对冒险行为的负面言论的影响。我们的研究结果为在旨在减少或改变危险行为的预防项目中使用机器人开辟了新的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
178
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Promoting the interests of scientific psychology and its researchers, QJEP, the journal of the Experimental Psychology Society, is a leading journal with a long-standing tradition of publishing cutting-edge research. Several articles have become classic papers in the fields of attention, perception, learning, memory, language, and reasoning. The journal publishes original articles on any topic within the field of experimental psychology (including comparative research). These include substantial experimental reports, review papers, rapid communications (reporting novel techniques or ground breaking results), comments (on articles previously published in QJEP or on issues of general interest to experimental psychologists), and book reviews. Experimental results are welcomed from all relevant techniques, including behavioural testing, brain imaging and computational modelling. QJEP offers a competitive publication time-scale. Accepted Rapid Communications have priority in the publication cycle and usually appear in print within three months. We aim to publish all accepted (but uncorrected) articles online within seven days. Our Latest Articles page offers immediate publication of articles upon reaching their final form. The journal offers an open access option called Open Select, enabling authors to meet funder requirements to make their article free to read online for all in perpetuity. Authors also benefit from a broad and diverse subscription base that delivers the journal contents to a world-wide readership. Together these features ensure that the journal offers authors the opportunity to raise the visibility of their work to a global audience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信