Association of electronic cigarette use and risk of COPD: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Muhammed Shabil, Ajay Malvi, Mahalaqua Nazli Khatib, Subbulakshmi Ganesan, Mandeep Kaur, Manish Srivastava, G V Siva Prasad, Pranchal Rajput, Brijendra Mohan, Diptismitha Jena, Ganesh Bushi, Sanjit Sah, Prakasini Satapathy, Shailesh Kumar Samal, Edward Mawejje
{"title":"Association of electronic cigarette use and risk of COPD: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Muhammed Shabil, Ajay Malvi, Mahalaqua Nazli Khatib, Subbulakshmi Ganesan, Mandeep Kaur, Manish Srivastava, G V Siva Prasad, Pranchal Rajput, Brijendra Mohan, Diptismitha Jena, Ganesh Bushi, Sanjit Sah, Prakasini Satapathy, Shailesh Kumar Samal, Edward Mawejje","doi":"10.1038/s41533-025-00438-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a global health concern, primarily linked to cigarette smoking. The potential role of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) in COPD development remains unclear. Despite growing popularity as a smoking alternative, evidence suggests e-cigarettes may have harmful respiratory effects. This systematic review and meta-analysis assess the relationship between e-cigarette use and odds of having COPD. A comprehensive search of Web of Science, Embase, and PubMed was conducted to identify observational studies that assessed the association between e-cigarette use and the risk of COPD, providing risk estimates (hazard ratios, risk ratios, or odds ratios) for current, former, and ever e-cigarette users. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed using R software (V 4.4), and heterogeneity was assessed with the I<sup>2</sup> statistic. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to test the robustness of the findings. Publication bias was evaluated using Egger's test and funnel plots. Seventeen studies (1087 records screened) were included. E-cigarette use was associated with significantly higher odds of COPD compared to non-use. The pooled odds ratios were 1.48 (95% CI: 1.36-1.61) for current users, 1.84 (95% CI: 1.51-2.23) for former users, and 1.79 (95% CI: 1.42-2.25) for ever users. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of the findings. E-cigarette use is associated with higher odds of having COPD. Public health efforts should consider raising awareness of the potential respiratory risks associated with e-cigarette use.</p>","PeriodicalId":19470,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine","volume":"35 1","pages":"31"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12234726/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41533-025-00438-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a global health concern, primarily linked to cigarette smoking. The potential role of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) in COPD development remains unclear. Despite growing popularity as a smoking alternative, evidence suggests e-cigarettes may have harmful respiratory effects. This systematic review and meta-analysis assess the relationship between e-cigarette use and odds of having COPD. A comprehensive search of Web of Science, Embase, and PubMed was conducted to identify observational studies that assessed the association between e-cigarette use and the risk of COPD, providing risk estimates (hazard ratios, risk ratios, or odds ratios) for current, former, and ever e-cigarette users. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed using R software (V 4.4), and heterogeneity was assessed with the I2 statistic. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to test the robustness of the findings. Publication bias was evaluated using Egger's test and funnel plots. Seventeen studies (1087 records screened) were included. E-cigarette use was associated with significantly higher odds of COPD compared to non-use. The pooled odds ratios were 1.48 (95% CI: 1.36-1.61) for current users, 1.84 (95% CI: 1.51-2.23) for former users, and 1.79 (95% CI: 1.42-2.25) for ever users. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of the findings. E-cigarette use is associated with higher odds of having COPD. Public health efforts should consider raising awareness of the potential respiratory risks associated with e-cigarette use.

电子烟使用与慢性阻塞性肺病风险的关联:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)是一个全球性的健康问题,主要与吸烟有关。电子烟在慢性阻塞性肺病发展中的潜在作用尚不清楚。尽管电子烟作为一种吸烟替代品越来越受欢迎,但有证据表明,电子烟可能对呼吸系统有害。本系统综述和荟萃分析评估了电子烟使用与慢性阻塞性肺病发病率之间的关系。对Web of Science、Embase和PubMed进行了全面搜索,以确定评估电子烟使用与COPD风险之间关系的观察性研究,为当前、以前和曾经使用电子烟的用户提供风险估计(风险比、风险比或优势比)。采用R软件(v4.4)进行随机效应荟萃分析,采用I2统计量评估异质性。进行敏感性分析以检验研究结果的稳健性。采用Egger检验和漏斗图评价发表偏倚。纳入17项研究(筛选的1087份记录)。与不使用电子烟相比,使用电子烟患慢性阻塞性肺病的几率明显更高。当前用户的合并优势比为1.48 (95% CI: 1.36-1.61),以前用户的合并优势比为1.84 (95% CI: 1.51-2.23),曾经用户的合并优势比为1.79 (95% CI: 1.42-2.25)。敏感性分析证实了研究结果的稳健性。使用电子烟与患慢性阻塞性肺病的几率较高有关。公共卫生工作应考虑提高人们对与使用电子烟有关的潜在呼吸道风险的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine
NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
49
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine is an open access, online-only, multidisciplinary journal dedicated to publishing high-quality research in all areas of the primary care management of respiratory and respiratory-related allergic diseases. Papers published by the journal represent important advances of significance to specialists within the fields of primary care and respiratory medicine. We are particularly interested in receiving papers in relation to the following aspects of respiratory medicine, respiratory-related allergic diseases and tobacco control: epidemiology prevention clinical care service delivery and organisation of healthcare (including implementation science) global health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信