Isolated restricted diffusion in glioblastoma: incidence, progression, and survival impact '.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jai Shankar, Nikunj Patil, Marco Ayroso, Roman Marin, Marc Del Bigio, Marshall Pitz, Jason Beiko, Joseph Silvaggio, Marco Essig, Saranya Kakumanu, Namita Sinha
{"title":"Isolated restricted diffusion in glioblastoma: incidence, progression, and survival impact '.","authors":"Jai Shankar, Nikunj Patil, Marco Ayroso, Roman Marin, Marc Del Bigio, Marshall Pitz, Jason Beiko, Joseph Silvaggio, Marco Essig, Saranya Kakumanu, Namita Sinha","doi":"10.1007/s00234-025-03672-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Glioblastoma (GB) is the most malignant primary brain tumor. Isolated restricted diffusion (IRD) is restricted diffusion outside the confines of enhancing tumor with no corresponding enhancement on post contrast study. The aim of our study was to prospectively assess the incidence of IRD in GB patients, determine how often these foci proceed to contrast enhancement on follow up, and analyze the survival pattern of patients with IRD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a prospective pilot cohort study, consecutive adult patients (≥ 18 years old) suspected of having GB on initial MRI of brain, were included and screened for the presence of IRD. All images were independently analyzed by two experienced radiologists for inter-rater reliability. The survival pattern of patients with IRD was assessed with Cox-regression and Kaplan-Meier curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 52 patients (median age- 63 years; male-63.5%) included, 21% (11 of 52) exhibited foci of IRD. Inter-rater agreement on the diagnosis of IRD foci was fair (kappa = 0.29) between the two readers. Among the 11 patients with IRD, only 7 (64%) showed enhancement in the IRD focus on imaging at a median follow up time of 110 days. The Kaplan Meier analysis revealed a significant decrease (p = 0.035) in the survival among patients with IRD focus.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, IRD foci were seen in 21% of patients with GB, with 64% of these demonstrating enhancement at the IRD focus on follow up imaging. A shorter survival was associated with IRD foci.</p>","PeriodicalId":19422,"journal":{"name":"Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-025-03672-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Glioblastoma (GB) is the most malignant primary brain tumor. Isolated restricted diffusion (IRD) is restricted diffusion outside the confines of enhancing tumor with no corresponding enhancement on post contrast study. The aim of our study was to prospectively assess the incidence of IRD in GB patients, determine how often these foci proceed to contrast enhancement on follow up, and analyze the survival pattern of patients with IRD.

Methods: In a prospective pilot cohort study, consecutive adult patients (≥ 18 years old) suspected of having GB on initial MRI of brain, were included and screened for the presence of IRD. All images were independently analyzed by two experienced radiologists for inter-rater reliability. The survival pattern of patients with IRD was assessed with Cox-regression and Kaplan-Meier curve analysis.

Results: Of the 52 patients (median age- 63 years; male-63.5%) included, 21% (11 of 52) exhibited foci of IRD. Inter-rater agreement on the diagnosis of IRD foci was fair (kappa = 0.29) between the two readers. Among the 11 patients with IRD, only 7 (64%) showed enhancement in the IRD focus on imaging at a median follow up time of 110 days. The Kaplan Meier analysis revealed a significant decrease (p = 0.035) in the survival among patients with IRD focus.

Conclusion: In conclusion, IRD foci were seen in 21% of patients with GB, with 64% of these demonstrating enhancement at the IRD focus on follow up imaging. A shorter survival was associated with IRD foci.

胶质母细胞瘤中分离的受限扩散:发病率、进展和生存影响。
背景:胶质母细胞瘤是恶性程度最高的原发性脑肿瘤。孤立性限制性扩散(IRD)是在增强肿瘤范围外的限制性扩散,在对比后研究中没有相应的增强。本研究的目的是前瞻性评估GB患者IRD的发生率,确定这些病灶在随访中进行对比增强的频率,并分析IRD患者的生存模式。方法:在一项前瞻性先导队列研究中,纳入连续的成人患者(≥18岁),在初始脑MRI上怀疑有GB,并筛查IRD的存在。所有图像均由两名经验丰富的放射科医生独立分析,以提高内部可靠性。采用Cox-regression和Kaplan-Meier曲线分析评估IRD患者的生存模式。结果:52例患者(中位年龄63岁;男性(63.5%),52例中有11例(21%)表现出IRD病灶。两名读者对IRD病灶诊断的评分一致性是公平的(kappa = 0.29)。在11例IRD患者中,只有7例(64%)在中位随访时间为110天时表现出IRD聚焦成像增强。Kaplan Meier分析显示,IRD病灶患者的生存率显著降低(p = 0.035)。结论:总而言之,21%的GB患者可见IRD病灶,其中64%的患者在随访成像中显示IRD病灶增强。较短的生存期与IRD灶相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuroradiology
Neuroradiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.60%
发文量
214
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neuroradiology aims to provide state-of-the-art medical and scientific information in the fields of Neuroradiology, Neurosciences, Neurology, Psychiatry, Neurosurgery, and related medical specialities. Neuroradiology as the official Journal of the European Society of Neuroradiology receives submissions from all parts of the world and publishes peer-reviewed original research, comprehensive reviews, educational papers, opinion papers, and short reports on exceptional clinical observations and new technical developments in the field of Neuroimaging and Neurointervention. The journal has subsections for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Advanced Neuroimaging, Paediatric Neuroradiology, Head-Neck-ENT Radiology, Spine Neuroradiology, and for submissions from Japan. Neuroradiology aims to provide new knowledge about and insights into the function and pathology of the human nervous system that may help to better diagnose and treat nervous system diseases. Neuroradiology is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and follows the COPE core practices. Neuroradiology prefers articles that are free of bias, self-critical regarding limitations, transparent and clear in describing study participants, methods, and statistics, and short in presenting results. Before peer-review all submissions are automatically checked by iThenticate to assess for potential overlap in prior publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信