A Comparison of Predicted and Achieved Postoperative Vaults in Implantable Collamer Lenses in White and Asian Eyes.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Christopher B J Ashton, Arthur Hammer, Tjebo F C Heeren, Bruce D Allan, Vincenzo Maurino, Daniel M Gore
{"title":"A Comparison of Predicted and Achieved Postoperative Vaults in Implantable Collamer Lenses in White and Asian Eyes.","authors":"Christopher B J Ashton, Arthur Hammer, Tjebo F C Heeren, Bruce D Allan, Vincenzo Maurino, Daniel M Gore","doi":"10.3928/1081597X-20250520-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare clinically achieved vaults with the predicted NK-formula V2 (NK-V2) and NK-formula V3 (NK-V3) vaults in a White and Asian population in patients undergoing Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected retrospectively from three surgeons for all patients who had ICL surgery for myopia between September 2020 and August 2022 at Moorfields Eye Hospital. ICL sizing was performed using the optimal NK-V2 sizing formula. The postoperative vault was measured using anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Back calculation was used to evaluate predicted versus achieved vaults for the newer NK-V3 formula.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 136 eyes from 72 patients were eligible. Seventy-two eyes of 72 patients were included in the analysis, 50 White (69%) and 22 Asian (31%). The mean residual vault for NK-V2 was -0.08 and -0.11 (<i>P</i> = .76) and NK-V3 was 0.04 and 0.02 (<i>P</i> = .78) for White and Asian, respectively. Mean absolute errors of the White sample were 0.2 and 0.16 for NKV2 and NK-V3, respectively (<i>P</i> = .23). Mean absolute errors of the Asian sample were 0.31 and 0.22 for NK-V2 and NK-V3, respectively (<i>P</i> = .16). There was no statistical significance when comparing mean absolute errors from White and Asian samples for NK-V2 or NK-V3.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>NK-V2 formula for ICL sizing, originally derived from an Asian population sample, appeared to perform at least as well in Whites with no adverse outcomes or safety issues. NK-V3 was superior in predicting postoperative vault compared to NK-V2 in Asian eyes and comparable for White eyes. <b>[<i>J Refract Surg</i>. 2025;41(7):e702-e708.]</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":16951,"journal":{"name":"Journal of refractive surgery","volume":"41 7","pages":"e702-e708"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20250520-02","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare clinically achieved vaults with the predicted NK-formula V2 (NK-V2) and NK-formula V3 (NK-V3) vaults in a White and Asian population in patients undergoing Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) surgery.

Methods: Data were collected retrospectively from three surgeons for all patients who had ICL surgery for myopia between September 2020 and August 2022 at Moorfields Eye Hospital. ICL sizing was performed using the optimal NK-V2 sizing formula. The postoperative vault was measured using anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Back calculation was used to evaluate predicted versus achieved vaults for the newer NK-V3 formula.

Results: A total of 136 eyes from 72 patients were eligible. Seventy-two eyes of 72 patients were included in the analysis, 50 White (69%) and 22 Asian (31%). The mean residual vault for NK-V2 was -0.08 and -0.11 (P = .76) and NK-V3 was 0.04 and 0.02 (P = .78) for White and Asian, respectively. Mean absolute errors of the White sample were 0.2 and 0.16 for NKV2 and NK-V3, respectively (P = .23). Mean absolute errors of the Asian sample were 0.31 and 0.22 for NK-V2 and NK-V3, respectively (P = .16). There was no statistical significance when comparing mean absolute errors from White and Asian samples for NK-V2 or NK-V3.

Conclusions: NK-V2 formula for ICL sizing, originally derived from an Asian population sample, appeared to perform at least as well in Whites with no adverse outcomes or safety issues. NK-V3 was superior in predicting postoperative vault compared to NK-V2 in Asian eyes and comparable for White eyes. [J Refract Surg. 2025;41(7):e702-e708.].

白人和亚洲人眼植入式晶状体术后预测和实现的穹窿比较。
目的:比较白人和亚洲人群中接受植入式屈光体(ICL)手术患者的临床实现的屈光体与预测的nk -公式V2 (NK-V2)和nk -公式V3 (NK-V3)的屈光体。方法:回顾性收集2020年9月至2022年8月在Moorfields眼科医院接受ICL手术的所有近视患者的三位外科医生的数据。采用最佳NK-V2施胶配方进行ICL施胶。术后使用前段光学相干断层扫描测量拱顶。使用反向计算来评估较新的NK-V3公式的预测和实现的vault。结果:72例患者共136只眼符合条件。72例患者的72只眼睛被纳入分析,50只白人(69%)和22只亚洲人(31%)。白种人和亚洲人NK-V2和NK-V3的平均残差分别为-0.08和-0.11 (P = 0.76)和0.04和0.02 (P = 0.78)。NKV2和NK-V3的White样本平均绝对误差分别为0.2和0.16 (P = 0.23)。亚洲样本的NK-V2和NK-V3的平均绝对误差分别为0.31和0.22 (P = 0.16)。在比较白人和亚洲人样本NK-V2或NK-V3的平均绝对误差时,没有统计学意义。结论:NK-V2 ICL大小公式最初来源于亚洲人群样本,在白人中表现至少一样好,没有不良后果或安全问题。与NK-V2相比,NK-V3在预测亚洲眼和白眼术后拱顶方面具有优势。[J].中华眼科杂志,2015;41(7):888 - 888。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
160
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Refractive Surgery, the official journal of the International Society of Refractive Surgery, a partner of the American Academy of Ophthalmology, has been a monthly peer-reviewed forum for original research, review, and evaluation of refractive and lens-based surgical procedures for more than 30 years. Practical, clinically valuable articles provide readers with the most up-to-date information regarding advances in the field of refractive surgery. Begin to explore the Journal and all of its great benefits such as: • Columns including “Translational Science,” “Surgical Techniques,” and “Biomechanics” • Supplemental videos and materials available for many articles • Access to current articles, as well as several years of archived content • Articles posted online just 2 months after acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信