Clinical Relevance of Gastric Emptying Time in Functional Dyspepsia.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Hye Lim Park, Jeongmin Lee, Soo Jin Kwon, Seonmi Lee, Inho Lee, Jung-Hwan Oh
{"title":"Clinical Relevance of Gastric Emptying Time in Functional Dyspepsia.","authors":"Hye Lim Park, Jeongmin Lee, Soo Jin Kwon, Seonmi Lee, Inho Lee, Jung-Hwan Oh","doi":"10.5056/jnm24138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>This study evaluates the clinical significance of the gastric emptying time (GET) in patients with functional dyspepsia (FD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 89 patients who visited the clinic with indigestion between 2021 and 2022. FD was diagnosed and categorized into 3 subtypes: postprandial distress syndrome, epigastric pain syndrome, and overlap type, following the Rome IV criteria. GET was assessed using <sup>99m</sup>Tc scintigraphy. The stomach remnant was measured 1 and 2 hours after ingesting a technetium-99m labeled egg, and the time required for the remnant to decrease by half (T<sub>1/2</sub>) was calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 89 patients studied, 46 were diagnosed with FD. The remaining 43 patients, who did not meet the Rome IV criteria, were included as the control group. Patients with FD exhibited a higher incidence of smoking, a higher body mass index, and a higher incidence of diabetes than the non-FD group. GET and T<sub>1/2</sub> did not show significant differences between the 2 groups (<i>P</i> = 0.240 and <i>P</i> = 0.126, respectively). However, the FD group exhibited a smaller gastric retention rate than the non-FD group at all time points. In the subtype analysis, GET and T<sub>1/2</sub> were not significantly different among the 3 subtypes (<i>P</i> = 1.000 and <i>P</i> = 0.173, respectively). Diabetes mellitus, current smoking status, elevated body mass index, and younger age were significantly associated with FD.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GET did not significantly differ among FD patients or its subtypes, despite a lower gastric retention rate in FD patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":16543,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility","volume":"31 3","pages":"366-373"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12241914/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5056/jnm24138","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aims: This study evaluates the clinical significance of the gastric emptying time (GET) in patients with functional dyspepsia (FD).

Methods: This retrospective study included 89 patients who visited the clinic with indigestion between 2021 and 2022. FD was diagnosed and categorized into 3 subtypes: postprandial distress syndrome, epigastric pain syndrome, and overlap type, following the Rome IV criteria. GET was assessed using 99mTc scintigraphy. The stomach remnant was measured 1 and 2 hours after ingesting a technetium-99m labeled egg, and the time required for the remnant to decrease by half (T1/2) was calculated.

Results: Of the 89 patients studied, 46 were diagnosed with FD. The remaining 43 patients, who did not meet the Rome IV criteria, were included as the control group. Patients with FD exhibited a higher incidence of smoking, a higher body mass index, and a higher incidence of diabetes than the non-FD group. GET and T1/2 did not show significant differences between the 2 groups (P = 0.240 and P = 0.126, respectively). However, the FD group exhibited a smaller gastric retention rate than the non-FD group at all time points. In the subtype analysis, GET and T1/2 were not significantly different among the 3 subtypes (P = 1.000 and P = 0.173, respectively). Diabetes mellitus, current smoking status, elevated body mass index, and younger age were significantly associated with FD.

Conclusion: GET did not significantly differ among FD patients or its subtypes, despite a lower gastric retention rate in FD patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

功能性消化不良患者胃排空时间的临床意义。
背景/目的:本研究探讨功能性消化不良(FD)患者胃排空时间(GET)的临床意义。方法:本回顾性研究纳入了89例在2021年至2022年间因消化不良就诊的患者。根据Rome IV标准,FD被诊断并分为3个亚型:餐后窘迫综合征、上腹痛综合征和重叠型。使用99mTc显像评估GET。在摄入锝-99m标记的鸡蛋后1小时和2小时测量胃残余,并计算残余减少一半所需的时间(T1/2)。结果:89例患者中,46例被诊断为FD。其余43例不符合Rome IV标准的患者作为对照组。与非FD组相比,FD患者表现出更高的吸烟发生率、更高的体重指数和更高的糖尿病发生率。GET、T1/2两组间差异无统计学意义(P = 0.240、P = 0.126)。然而,在所有时间点,FD组的胃潴留率都低于非FD组。在亚型分析中,GET和T1/2在3个亚型间差异无统计学意义(P = 1.000和P = 0.173)。糖尿病、当前吸烟状况、体重指数升高和年龄较低与FD显著相关。结论:尽管FD患者胃潴留率较低,但GET在FD患者及其亚型之间无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.80%
发文量
96
期刊介绍: Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility (J Neurogastroenterol Motil) is a joint official journal of the Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, the Thai Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society, the Japanese Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, the Indian Motility and Functional Disease Association, the Chinese Society of Gastrointestinal Motility, the South East Asia Gastro-Neuro Motility Association, the Taiwan Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society and the Asian Neurogastroenterology and Motility Association, launched in January 2010 after the title change from the Korean Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, published from 1994 to 2009.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信