Occurrence of Invisible Eye Movement in KLEx and Its Effect on Visual Quality and Refractive Outcomes.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Bo Mei, Yu Li, Dan Su, Shuangfeng Liang, Yue-Hua Zhou, Chun-Yang Zhou
{"title":"Occurrence of Invisible Eye Movement in KLEx and Its Effect on Visual Quality and Refractive Outcomes.","authors":"Bo Mei, Yu Li, Dan Su, Shuangfeng Liang, Yue-Hua Zhou, Chun-Yang Zhou","doi":"10.3928/1081597X-20250515-03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the effect of invisible eye movements on visual quality and refractive outcomes during intraoperative laser scanning with keratorefractive lenticule extraction (KLEx).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eye movement direction and maximum distance were measured using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health) in 487 patients (958 eyes). Comparisons were made among left eyes with movement of 0.1 mm or less, movement of less than 0.1 mm, and movement of 0 mm regarding refraction, astigmatism vector analysis, uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), Strehl ratio (SR), modulation transfer function (MTF) cut-off, and higher order aberrations (HOAs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 958 eyes, 105 eyes experienced invisible movement (10.96%). Specifically, 23 right eyes (4.80%) and 82 left eyes (17.12%) showed a mean movement of 0.07 mm. There was a significant difference in incidence of invisible movement between the different eyes (<i>P</i> < .001), but not in movement distances (<i>P</i> = .63). Movements were primarily directed between 45° and 135°. At 3 months postoperatively, no significant differences were found in refraction, astigmatism vector analysis, UDVA, SR, MTF cut-off, total HOAs, coma aberration, and spherical aberration (<i>P</i> ⩾ .05). Trefoil aberration was higher in the 0.1 mm or greater group compared to the other groups (<i>P</i> = .03). However, the difference between the less than 0.1 mm group and 0 mm group was not statistically significant (<i>P</i> = .48).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Invisible movement is common in KLEx surgery. It is typically observed upward (45° to 135°), and with a higher incidence in the left eye than the right eye. Although invisible movement does not affect postoperative refractive outcomes, a movement distance of 0.1 mm or greater may increase corneal trefoil aberration. <b>[<i>J Refract Surg</i>. 2025;41(7):e674-e681.]</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":16951,"journal":{"name":"Journal of refractive surgery","volume":"41 7","pages":"e674-e681"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20250515-03","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the effect of invisible eye movements on visual quality and refractive outcomes during intraoperative laser scanning with keratorefractive lenticule extraction (KLEx).

Methods: Eye movement direction and maximum distance were measured using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health) in 487 patients (958 eyes). Comparisons were made among left eyes with movement of 0.1 mm or less, movement of less than 0.1 mm, and movement of 0 mm regarding refraction, astigmatism vector analysis, uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), Strehl ratio (SR), modulation transfer function (MTF) cut-off, and higher order aberrations (HOAs).

Results: Among 958 eyes, 105 eyes experienced invisible movement (10.96%). Specifically, 23 right eyes (4.80%) and 82 left eyes (17.12%) showed a mean movement of 0.07 mm. There was a significant difference in incidence of invisible movement between the different eyes (P < .001), but not in movement distances (P = .63). Movements were primarily directed between 45° and 135°. At 3 months postoperatively, no significant differences were found in refraction, astigmatism vector analysis, UDVA, SR, MTF cut-off, total HOAs, coma aberration, and spherical aberration (P ⩾ .05). Trefoil aberration was higher in the 0.1 mm or greater group compared to the other groups (P = .03). However, the difference between the less than 0.1 mm group and 0 mm group was not statistically significant (P = .48).

Conclusions: Invisible movement is common in KLEx surgery. It is typically observed upward (45° to 135°), and with a higher incidence in the left eye than the right eye. Although invisible movement does not affect postoperative refractive outcomes, a movement distance of 0.1 mm or greater may increase corneal trefoil aberration. [J Refract Surg. 2025;41(7):e674-e681.].

屈光性屈光症患者隐形眼运动的发生及其对视觉质量和屈光效果的影响。
目的:探讨术中隐形眼运动对激光扫描角膜屈光透镜摘除术(KLEx)患者视觉质量和屈光结果的影响。方法:采用美国国立卫生研究院ImageJ软件对487例患者(958只眼)进行眼动方向和最大距离测量。比较运动小于或等于0.1 mm的左眼、运动小于0.1 mm的左眼和运动小于0 mm的左眼在屈光、散光矢量分析、未校正距离视力(UDVA)、Strehl比(SR)、调制传递函数(MTF)截止点和高阶像差(HOAs)方面的差异。结果:958只眼中有105只眼出现不可见运动,占10.96%。其中右眼23只(4.80%)、左眼82只(17.12%)平均移动0.07 mm。不同眼间隐形运动发生率差异有统计学意义(P < 0.001),但运动距离差异无统计学意义(P = 0.63)。运动方向主要在45°到135°之间。在术后3个月,在屈光、散光矢量分析、UDVA、SR、MTF截止、总hoa、彗差和球差方面没有发现显著差异(P小于0.05)。三叶像差在0.1 mm及以上组高于其他组(P = .03)。而小于0.1 mm组与0 mm组间差异无统计学意义(P = 0.48)。结论:KLEx手术中常见隐性运动。通常向上(45°~ 135°),左眼发生率高于右眼。虽然看不见的运动不影响术后屈光结果,但0.1 mm或更大的运动距离可能会增加角膜三叶草像差。[J].中华眼科杂志,2015;41(7):674- 681。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
160
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Refractive Surgery, the official journal of the International Society of Refractive Surgery, a partner of the American Academy of Ophthalmology, has been a monthly peer-reviewed forum for original research, review, and evaluation of refractive and lens-based surgical procedures for more than 30 years. Practical, clinically valuable articles provide readers with the most up-to-date information regarding advances in the field of refractive surgery. Begin to explore the Journal and all of its great benefits such as: • Columns including “Translational Science,” “Surgical Techniques,” and “Biomechanics” • Supplemental videos and materials available for many articles • Access to current articles, as well as several years of archived content • Articles posted online just 2 months after acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信