Gabriela Torres Zanin , Edgar Pedreiro Ribeiro , Bianca Medeiros Maran , Murilo Baena Lopes , Ricardo Danil Guiraldo , Alessandra Reis , Alessandro D. Loguercio , Sandrine Bittencourt Berger
{"title":"Dental aesthetic perception of patients submitted to violet LED bleaching: Randomized controlled trial","authors":"Gabriela Torres Zanin , Edgar Pedreiro Ribeiro , Bianca Medeiros Maran , Murilo Baena Lopes , Ricardo Danil Guiraldo , Alessandra Reis , Alessandro D. Loguercio , Sandrine Bittencourt Berger","doi":"10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the effects of violet LED compared to 35 % hydrogen peroxide (HP) and the combination of treatments, on aesthetic perception and psychosocial impact before and after treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Eighty-four participants were randomly assigned to three bleaching groups (<em>n</em> = 28): HP only, violet LED only (VLED), and HP combined with violet LED (HP+VLED). Treatments were applied in three sessions at seven-day intervals. The following questionnaires were applied before and 30 days after treatment: Psychosocial Impact of Dental Aesthetics Questionnaire (PIDAQ), Oral Health Impact Profile specific to Aesthetics (OHIP-Aesthetics), and Orofacial Esthetics Scale (OES). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, linear mixed models for repeated measures, and nonparametric tests (α = 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>For PIDAQ, the HP and HP+VLED groups showed significant increases in dental self-confidence and reductions in social and psychological impacts, as well as in aesthetic concern (<em>p</em> < 0.05). The VLED group demonstrated improvement only in social impact and aesthetic concern. For OHIP-Aesthetics, only the HP+VLED group presented significant reductions in functional limitation, psychological discomfort, physical and psychological disability, and total score (<em>p</em> < 0.05). The OES scores increased significantly in the HP and HP+VLED groups, but not in the VLED group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Violet LED alone produced limited benefits for aesthetic perception and quality of life. Treatments with 35 % HP, alone or combined with violet LED, led to greater improvements in self-perception and reduced psychosocial impact.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical relevance</h3><div>The current study demonstrates that while violet LED alone offers limited benefits, 35 % hydrogen peroxide protocols generate meaningful improvements in dental self-confidence, reduced psychosocial impact, and enhanced aesthetic satisfaction. These effects were evident in both the HP-only and HP+VLED groups. The findings highlight that beyond achieving a whiter smile, bleaching treatments can positively influence patient-reported outcomes related to quality of life, reinforcing the importance of including psychosocial measures when evaluating aesthetic dental interventions. This study contributes valuable data to support patient-centered care in clinical practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15585,"journal":{"name":"Journal of dentistry","volume":"161 ","pages":"Article 105961"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0300571225004051","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To evaluate the effects of violet LED compared to 35 % hydrogen peroxide (HP) and the combination of treatments, on aesthetic perception and psychosocial impact before and after treatment.
Methods
Eighty-four participants were randomly assigned to three bleaching groups (n = 28): HP only, violet LED only (VLED), and HP combined with violet LED (HP+VLED). Treatments were applied in three sessions at seven-day intervals. The following questionnaires were applied before and 30 days after treatment: Psychosocial Impact of Dental Aesthetics Questionnaire (PIDAQ), Oral Health Impact Profile specific to Aesthetics (OHIP-Aesthetics), and Orofacial Esthetics Scale (OES). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, linear mixed models for repeated measures, and nonparametric tests (α = 0.05).
Results
For PIDAQ, the HP and HP+VLED groups showed significant increases in dental self-confidence and reductions in social and psychological impacts, as well as in aesthetic concern (p < 0.05). The VLED group demonstrated improvement only in social impact and aesthetic concern. For OHIP-Aesthetics, only the HP+VLED group presented significant reductions in functional limitation, psychological discomfort, physical and psychological disability, and total score (p < 0.05). The OES scores increased significantly in the HP and HP+VLED groups, but not in the VLED group.
Conclusion
Violet LED alone produced limited benefits for aesthetic perception and quality of life. Treatments with 35 % HP, alone or combined with violet LED, led to greater improvements in self-perception and reduced psychosocial impact.
Clinical relevance
The current study demonstrates that while violet LED alone offers limited benefits, 35 % hydrogen peroxide protocols generate meaningful improvements in dental self-confidence, reduced psychosocial impact, and enhanced aesthetic satisfaction. These effects were evident in both the HP-only and HP+VLED groups. The findings highlight that beyond achieving a whiter smile, bleaching treatments can positively influence patient-reported outcomes related to quality of life, reinforcing the importance of including psychosocial measures when evaluating aesthetic dental interventions. This study contributes valuable data to support patient-centered care in clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Dentistry has an open access mirror journal The Journal of Dentistry: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review.
The Journal of Dentistry is the leading international dental journal within the field of Restorative Dentistry. Placing an emphasis on publishing novel and high-quality research papers, the Journal aims to influence the practice of dentistry at clinician, research, industry and policy-maker level on an international basis.
Topics covered include the management of dental disease, periodontology, endodontology, operative dentistry, fixed and removable prosthodontics, dental biomaterials science, long-term clinical trials including epidemiology and oral health, technology transfer of new scientific instrumentation or procedures, as well as clinically relevant oral biology and translational research.
The Journal of Dentistry will publish original scientific research papers including short communications. It is also interested in publishing review articles and leaders in themed areas which will be linked to new scientific research. Conference proceedings are also welcome and expressions of interest should be communicated to the Editor.