Dental aesthetic perception of patients submitted to violet LED bleaching: Randomized controlled trial

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Gabriela Torres Zanin , Edgar Pedreiro Ribeiro , Bianca Medeiros Maran , Murilo Baena Lopes , Ricardo Danil Guiraldo , Alessandra Reis , Alessandro D. Loguercio , Sandrine Bittencourt Berger
{"title":"Dental aesthetic perception of patients submitted to violet LED bleaching: Randomized controlled trial","authors":"Gabriela Torres Zanin ,&nbsp;Edgar Pedreiro Ribeiro ,&nbsp;Bianca Medeiros Maran ,&nbsp;Murilo Baena Lopes ,&nbsp;Ricardo Danil Guiraldo ,&nbsp;Alessandra Reis ,&nbsp;Alessandro D. Loguercio ,&nbsp;Sandrine Bittencourt Berger","doi":"10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the effects of violet LED compared to 35 % hydrogen peroxide (HP) and the combination of treatments, on aesthetic perception and psychosocial impact before and after treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Eighty-four participants were randomly assigned to three bleaching groups (<em>n</em> = 28): HP only, violet LED only (VLED), and HP combined with violet LED (HP+VLED). Treatments were applied in three sessions at seven-day intervals. The following questionnaires were applied before and 30 days after treatment: Psychosocial Impact of Dental Aesthetics Questionnaire (PIDAQ), Oral Health Impact Profile specific to Aesthetics (OHIP-Aesthetics), and Orofacial Esthetics Scale (OES). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, linear mixed models for repeated measures, and nonparametric tests (α = 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>For PIDAQ, the HP and HP+VLED groups showed significant increases in dental self-confidence and reductions in social and psychological impacts, as well as in aesthetic concern (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). The VLED group demonstrated improvement only in social impact and aesthetic concern. For OHIP-Aesthetics, only the HP+VLED group presented significant reductions in functional limitation, psychological discomfort, physical and psychological disability, and total score (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). The OES scores increased significantly in the HP and HP+VLED groups, but not in the VLED group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Violet LED alone produced limited benefits for aesthetic perception and quality of life. Treatments with 35 % HP, alone or combined with violet LED, led to greater improvements in self-perception and reduced psychosocial impact.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical relevance</h3><div>The current study demonstrates that while violet LED alone offers limited benefits, 35 % hydrogen peroxide protocols generate meaningful improvements in dental self-confidence, reduced psychosocial impact, and enhanced aesthetic satisfaction. These effects were evident in both the HP-only and HP+VLED groups. The findings highlight that beyond achieving a whiter smile, bleaching treatments can positively influence patient-reported outcomes related to quality of life, reinforcing the importance of including psychosocial measures when evaluating aesthetic dental interventions. This study contributes valuable data to support patient-centered care in clinical practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15585,"journal":{"name":"Journal of dentistry","volume":"161 ","pages":"Article 105961"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0300571225004051","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the effects of violet LED compared to 35 % hydrogen peroxide (HP) and the combination of treatments, on aesthetic perception and psychosocial impact before and after treatment.

Methods

Eighty-four participants were randomly assigned to three bleaching groups (n = 28): HP only, violet LED only (VLED), and HP combined with violet LED (HP+VLED). Treatments were applied in three sessions at seven-day intervals. The following questionnaires were applied before and 30 days after treatment: Psychosocial Impact of Dental Aesthetics Questionnaire (PIDAQ), Oral Health Impact Profile specific to Aesthetics (OHIP-Aesthetics), and Orofacial Esthetics Scale (OES). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, linear mixed models for repeated measures, and nonparametric tests (α = 0.05).

Results

For PIDAQ, the HP and HP+VLED groups showed significant increases in dental self-confidence and reductions in social and psychological impacts, as well as in aesthetic concern (p < 0.05). The VLED group demonstrated improvement only in social impact and aesthetic concern. For OHIP-Aesthetics, only the HP+VLED group presented significant reductions in functional limitation, psychological discomfort, physical and psychological disability, and total score (p < 0.05). The OES scores increased significantly in the HP and HP+VLED groups, but not in the VLED group.

Conclusion

Violet LED alone produced limited benefits for aesthetic perception and quality of life. Treatments with 35 % HP, alone or combined with violet LED, led to greater improvements in self-perception and reduced psychosocial impact.

Clinical relevance

The current study demonstrates that while violet LED alone offers limited benefits, 35 % hydrogen peroxide protocols generate meaningful improvements in dental self-confidence, reduced psychosocial impact, and enhanced aesthetic satisfaction. These effects were evident in both the HP-only and HP+VLED groups. The findings highlight that beyond achieving a whiter smile, bleaching treatments can positively influence patient-reported outcomes related to quality of life, reinforcing the importance of including psychosocial measures when evaluating aesthetic dental interventions. This study contributes valuable data to support patient-centered care in clinical practice.
紫LED漂白患者的牙齿美感:随机对照试验。
目的:比较紫色LED与35%双氧水(HP)及两种治疗方法联合使用对治疗前后患者审美及心理社会影响的影响。方法:84名受试者随机分为三个漂白组(n = 28):HP单独漂白组、紫色LED单独漂白组(VLED)和HP联合紫色LED漂白组(HP+VLED)。治疗分为三个阶段,每隔7天进行一次。在治疗前和治疗后30天分别使用以下问卷:口腔美学心理社会影响问卷(PIDAQ)、口腔美学特定健康影响问卷(OHIP-Aesthetics)和口腔面部美学量表(OES)。数据分析采用描述性统计、重复测量的线性混合模型和非参数检验(α = 0.05)。结果:对于PIDAQ, HP组和HP+VLED组在牙科自信方面显著增加,在社会和心理影响方面显著减少,以及在审美方面的关注(结论:单独使用紫色LED对审美感知和生活质量的好处有限。35% HP单独治疗或与紫色LED联合治疗,在自我认知方面有更大的改善,并减少了社会心理影响。临床相关性:目前的研究表明,虽然紫色LED单独提供有限的好处,但35%过氧化氢方案可以显著改善牙科自信,减少心理社会影响,并提高审美满意度。这些影响在HP组和HP+VLED组中都很明显。研究结果强调,除了获得更白的微笑外,漂白治疗还能对患者报告的与生活质量相关的结果产生积极影响,这加强了在评估牙科美容干预措施时包括心理社会措施的重要性。本研究为临床实践中以患者为中心的护理提供了有价值的数据支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of dentistry
Journal of dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
11.40%
发文量
349
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Dentistry has an open access mirror journal The Journal of Dentistry: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. The Journal of Dentistry is the leading international dental journal within the field of Restorative Dentistry. Placing an emphasis on publishing novel and high-quality research papers, the Journal aims to influence the practice of dentistry at clinician, research, industry and policy-maker level on an international basis. Topics covered include the management of dental disease, periodontology, endodontology, operative dentistry, fixed and removable prosthodontics, dental biomaterials science, long-term clinical trials including epidemiology and oral health, technology transfer of new scientific instrumentation or procedures, as well as clinically relevant oral biology and translational research. The Journal of Dentistry will publish original scientific research papers including short communications. It is also interested in publishing review articles and leaders in themed areas which will be linked to new scientific research. Conference proceedings are also welcome and expressions of interest should be communicated to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信