Amanda M Soo Ping Chow, Laura S Johnson, Tuan D Le, Melissa McLawhorn, Lauren T Moffatt, Taryn E Travis, Jeffrey W Shupp, Shawn Tejiram
{"title":"Utilizing Indirect Intrapleural Pressure to Guide Mechanical Ventilation in Burn Patients with ARDS.","authors":"Amanda M Soo Ping Chow, Laura S Johnson, Tuan D Le, Melissa McLawhorn, Lauren T Moffatt, Taryn E Travis, Jeffrey W Shupp, Shawn Tejiram","doi":"10.1093/jbcr/iraf119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients with severe burn injuries are at risk of developing acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Modern ARDS management does not typically factor in how burn injury influences lung dynamics during ventilator management. Obtaining indirect intrapleural pressures via esophageal pressure monitoring (Pes) may provide unique guidance on optimal positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) titration to prevent alveolar collapse while ensuring safe plateau pressures but is not well described in burn injured patients. This work examined the use of Pes in burn injured patients with ARDS to determine its effect on ventilator changes. Burn injured patients admitted to an ABA verified burn center who developed ARDS by the Berlin definition and received Pes were retrospectively reviewed to determine ventilator settings and oxygenation trends. Severity of ARDS and oxygenation were determined by PaO2 to FiO2 (P/F) ratios and oxygenation indices (OI) prior to Pes use, and at 1-, 3- and 5-day intervals following initiation. Of the 23 patients included, the median revised Baux score was 91.6 (73.9-114.6), and the mortality rate was 82.6%. Increases in PEEP were required [12 (4) vs 17 (4); p<.0001] following Pes initiation. P/F ratios increased by day 5 post-Pes monitoring [300 (35.1)] compared to pre- [141 (26.5); p=.0020], 1 day post- [169 (26.5); p=.0134] and 3 days post- [179 (29.4); p=.0325] monitoring. OI between pre-Pes monitoring and day 5 post Pes monitoring, were not significant [17.3 (1.92) vs 13.4 (2.57)]. A strategy incorporating Pes to guide ventilator management in burn injured patients with ARDS may be used.</p>","PeriodicalId":15205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iraf119","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Patients with severe burn injuries are at risk of developing acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Modern ARDS management does not typically factor in how burn injury influences lung dynamics during ventilator management. Obtaining indirect intrapleural pressures via esophageal pressure monitoring (Pes) may provide unique guidance on optimal positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) titration to prevent alveolar collapse while ensuring safe plateau pressures but is not well described in burn injured patients. This work examined the use of Pes in burn injured patients with ARDS to determine its effect on ventilator changes. Burn injured patients admitted to an ABA verified burn center who developed ARDS by the Berlin definition and received Pes were retrospectively reviewed to determine ventilator settings and oxygenation trends. Severity of ARDS and oxygenation were determined by PaO2 to FiO2 (P/F) ratios and oxygenation indices (OI) prior to Pes use, and at 1-, 3- and 5-day intervals following initiation. Of the 23 patients included, the median revised Baux score was 91.6 (73.9-114.6), and the mortality rate was 82.6%. Increases in PEEP were required [12 (4) vs 17 (4); p<.0001] following Pes initiation. P/F ratios increased by day 5 post-Pes monitoring [300 (35.1)] compared to pre- [141 (26.5); p=.0020], 1 day post- [169 (26.5); p=.0134] and 3 days post- [179 (29.4); p=.0325] monitoring. OI between pre-Pes monitoring and day 5 post Pes monitoring, were not significant [17.3 (1.92) vs 13.4 (2.57)]. A strategy incorporating Pes to guide ventilator management in burn injured patients with ARDS may be used.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Burn Care & Research provides the latest information on advances in burn prevention, research, education, delivery of acute care, and research to all members of the burn care team. As the official publication of the American Burn Association, this is the only U.S. journal devoted exclusively to the treatment and research of patients with burns. Original, peer-reviewed articles present the latest information on surgical procedures, acute care, reconstruction, burn prevention, and research and education. Other topics include physical therapy/occupational therapy, nutrition, current events in the evolving healthcare debate, and reports on the newest computer software for diagnostics and treatment. The Journal serves all burn care specialists, from physicians, nurses, and physical and occupational therapists to psychologists, counselors, and researchers.