Utilizing Indirect Intrapleural Pressure to Guide Mechanical Ventilation in Burn Patients with ARDS.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Amanda M Soo Ping Chow, Laura S Johnson, Tuan D Le, Melissa McLawhorn, Lauren T Moffatt, Taryn E Travis, Jeffrey W Shupp, Shawn Tejiram
{"title":"Utilizing Indirect Intrapleural Pressure to Guide Mechanical Ventilation in Burn Patients with ARDS.","authors":"Amanda M Soo Ping Chow, Laura S Johnson, Tuan D Le, Melissa McLawhorn, Lauren T Moffatt, Taryn E Travis, Jeffrey W Shupp, Shawn Tejiram","doi":"10.1093/jbcr/iraf119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients with severe burn injuries are at risk of developing acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Modern ARDS management does not typically factor in how burn injury influences lung dynamics during ventilator management. Obtaining indirect intrapleural pressures via esophageal pressure monitoring (Pes) may provide unique guidance on optimal positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) titration to prevent alveolar collapse while ensuring safe plateau pressures but is not well described in burn injured patients. This work examined the use of Pes in burn injured patients with ARDS to determine its effect on ventilator changes. Burn injured patients admitted to an ABA verified burn center who developed ARDS by the Berlin definition and received Pes were retrospectively reviewed to determine ventilator settings and oxygenation trends. Severity of ARDS and oxygenation were determined by PaO2 to FiO2 (P/F) ratios and oxygenation indices (OI) prior to Pes use, and at 1-, 3- and 5-day intervals following initiation. Of the 23 patients included, the median revised Baux score was 91.6 (73.9-114.6), and the mortality rate was 82.6%. Increases in PEEP were required [12 (4) vs 17 (4); p<.0001] following Pes initiation. P/F ratios increased by day 5 post-Pes monitoring [300 (35.1)] compared to pre- [141 (26.5); p=.0020], 1 day post- [169 (26.5); p=.0134] and 3 days post- [179 (29.4); p=.0325] monitoring. OI between pre-Pes monitoring and day 5 post Pes monitoring, were not significant [17.3 (1.92) vs 13.4 (2.57)]. A strategy incorporating Pes to guide ventilator management in burn injured patients with ARDS may be used.</p>","PeriodicalId":15205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iraf119","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patients with severe burn injuries are at risk of developing acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Modern ARDS management does not typically factor in how burn injury influences lung dynamics during ventilator management. Obtaining indirect intrapleural pressures via esophageal pressure monitoring (Pes) may provide unique guidance on optimal positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) titration to prevent alveolar collapse while ensuring safe plateau pressures but is not well described in burn injured patients. This work examined the use of Pes in burn injured patients with ARDS to determine its effect on ventilator changes. Burn injured patients admitted to an ABA verified burn center who developed ARDS by the Berlin definition and received Pes were retrospectively reviewed to determine ventilator settings and oxygenation trends. Severity of ARDS and oxygenation were determined by PaO2 to FiO2 (P/F) ratios and oxygenation indices (OI) prior to Pes use, and at 1-, 3- and 5-day intervals following initiation. Of the 23 patients included, the median revised Baux score was 91.6 (73.9-114.6), and the mortality rate was 82.6%. Increases in PEEP were required [12 (4) vs 17 (4); p<.0001] following Pes initiation. P/F ratios increased by day 5 post-Pes monitoring [300 (35.1)] compared to pre- [141 (26.5); p=.0020], 1 day post- [169 (26.5); p=.0134] and 3 days post- [179 (29.4); p=.0325] monitoring. OI between pre-Pes monitoring and day 5 post Pes monitoring, were not significant [17.3 (1.92) vs 13.4 (2.57)]. A strategy incorporating Pes to guide ventilator management in burn injured patients with ARDS may be used.

应用间接胸膜内压指导烧伤合并ARDS患者机械通气。
严重烧伤患者有发生急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的危险。现代ARDS管理通常不考虑在呼吸机管理期间烧伤对肺动力学的影响。通过食管压力监测(Pes)获得间接胸膜内压力可能为最佳呼气末正压(PEEP)滴定提供独特的指导,以防止肺泡塌陷,同时确保安全的平台压力,但在烧伤患者中尚未得到很好的描述。本研究考察了pe在急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)烧伤患者中的应用,以确定其对呼吸机更换的影响。经美国烧伤协会认证的烧伤中心收治的经Berlin定义发展为ARDS并接受Pes治疗的烧伤患者进行回顾性分析,以确定呼吸机设置和氧合趋势。通过使用Pes前以及开始使用后1、3、5天的PaO2 / FiO2 (P/F)比率和氧合指数(OI)来确定ARDS的严重程度和氧合情况。在纳入的23例患者中,修订后Baux评分中位数为91.6(73.9-114.6),死亡率为82.6%。需要增加PEEP [12 (4) vs 17 (4);p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
535
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Burn Care & Research provides the latest information on advances in burn prevention, research, education, delivery of acute care, and research to all members of the burn care team. As the official publication of the American Burn Association, this is the only U.S. journal devoted exclusively to the treatment and research of patients with burns. Original, peer-reviewed articles present the latest information on surgical procedures, acute care, reconstruction, burn prevention, and research and education. Other topics include physical therapy/occupational therapy, nutrition, current events in the evolving healthcare debate, and reports on the newest computer software for diagnostics and treatment. The Journal serves all burn care specialists, from physicians, nurses, and physical and occupational therapists to psychologists, counselors, and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信