Long-Term Outcomes of Percutaneous Balloon Compression for Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Retrospective Single-Center Study.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Bo Zhao, Dong-Mei Xu, Hao-Yu Dong, Bin Zhu, Xian-Bin Ning
{"title":"Long-Term Outcomes of Percutaneous Balloon Compression for Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Retrospective Single-Center Study.","authors":"Bo Zhao, Dong-Mei Xu, Hao-Yu Dong, Bin Zhu, Xian-Bin Ning","doi":"10.1097/SCS.0000000000011629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of percutaneous balloon compression (PBC) in individuals diagnosed with trigeminal neuralgia (TN) and to assess whether procedural modifications influence the durability of pain relief.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included patients diagnosed with TN who underwent PBC at the Department of Neurosurgery, Affiliated Hospital of Beihua University, between January 2017 and December 2025. Two procedural protocols were compared. In group A (treated from January 2017 to December 2020), balloon compression was maintained at baseline pressure for 180 seconds after achieving the optimal \"pear shape.\" In group B (treated from January 2021 to December 2025), compression was maintained for 120 seconds at a pressure increased by 10% above baseline after pear shape formation. Postoperative pain relief, recurrence rates, and complication rates were compared between the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Immediate postoperative pain relief rates within 24 hours did not differ significantly between the 2 groups (90.7% versus 97.6%; P=0.109). However, the 5-year recurrence rate was significantly lower in group B (9.6%) compared with group A (22.4%; P=0.043). The incidence of complications, excluding numbness, showed no significant difference between the groups (22.2% versus 27.1%; P=0.522).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A modified PBC technique involving an additional 10% increase in pressure for 120 seconds after optimal balloon positioning was associated with improved long-term pain control in patients with TN, without a corresponding increase in procedural complications. These findings suggest that procedural optimization may enhance the durability of therapeutic outcomes in PBC for this patient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":15462,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000011629","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of percutaneous balloon compression (PBC) in individuals diagnosed with trigeminal neuralgia (TN) and to assess whether procedural modifications influence the durability of pain relief.

Methods: This retrospective study included patients diagnosed with TN who underwent PBC at the Department of Neurosurgery, Affiliated Hospital of Beihua University, between January 2017 and December 2025. Two procedural protocols were compared. In group A (treated from January 2017 to December 2020), balloon compression was maintained at baseline pressure for 180 seconds after achieving the optimal "pear shape." In group B (treated from January 2021 to December 2025), compression was maintained for 120 seconds at a pressure increased by 10% above baseline after pear shape formation. Postoperative pain relief, recurrence rates, and complication rates were compared between the 2 groups.

Results: Immediate postoperative pain relief rates within 24 hours did not differ significantly between the 2 groups (90.7% versus 97.6%; P=0.109). However, the 5-year recurrence rate was significantly lower in group B (9.6%) compared with group A (22.4%; P=0.043). The incidence of complications, excluding numbness, showed no significant difference between the groups (22.2% versus 27.1%; P=0.522).

Conclusions: A modified PBC technique involving an additional 10% increase in pressure for 120 seconds after optimal balloon positioning was associated with improved long-term pain control in patients with TN, without a corresponding increase in procedural complications. These findings suggest that procedural optimization may enhance the durability of therapeutic outcomes in PBC for this patient population.

经皮球囊压迫治疗三叉神经痛的长期疗效:一项回顾性单中心研究。
目的:本研究旨在评估诊断为三叉神经痛(TN)的个体经皮球囊压迫(PBC)的长期结果,并评估手术修改是否影响疼痛缓解的持久性。方法:本回顾性研究纳入2017年1月至2025年12月在北华大学附属医院神经外科诊断为TN并行PBC的患者。比较两种手术方案。在A组(2017年1月至2020年12月治疗)中,在达到最佳“梨形”后,球囊压缩保持在基线压力180秒。B组(2021年1月至2025年12月)在梨形形成后压力比基线增加10%的情况下保持压力120秒。比较两组患者术后疼痛缓解程度、复发率及并发症发生率。结果:两组患者术后24小时内即刻疼痛缓解率无显著差异(90.7% vs 97.6%;P = 0.109)。但B组5年复发率(9.6%)明显低于A组(22.4%;P = 0.043)。除麻木外,两组间并发症发生率无显著差异(22.2% vs 27.1%;P = 0.522)。结论:改良PBC技术在最佳球囊定位后120秒内增加10%的压力,可改善TN患者的长期疼痛控制,而不会增加相应的手术并发症。这些发现表明,程序优化可能会提高PBC患者群体治疗结果的持久性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
968
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery serves as a forum of communication for all those involved in craniofacial surgery, maxillofacial surgery and pediatric plastic surgery. Coverage ranges from practical aspects of craniofacial surgery to the basic science that underlies surgical practice. The journal publishes original articles, scientific reviews, editorials and invited commentary, abstracts and selected articles from international journals, and occasional international bibliographies in craniofacial surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信