Prospective Evaluation of Internal Cranial Fronto-Occipital Diameter/Corpus Callosum Length Ratio on Normal Depistage and IUFGR Prenatal Ultrasound.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 ACOUSTICS
M Sarreau, O Hubert, A Couillet, H Dahmouni, V Vequeau-Goua, I Silmenova Brachot
{"title":"Prospective Evaluation of Internal Cranial Fronto-Occipital Diameter/Corpus Callosum Length Ratio on Normal Depistage and IUFGR Prenatal Ultrasound.","authors":"M Sarreau, O Hubert, A Couillet, H Dahmouni, V Vequeau-Goua, I Silmenova Brachot","doi":"10.1002/jcu.24057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Aim to explore the feasibility of assessing the relationship between the internal cranial fronto-occipital diameter (IFOD) and corpus callosum (CC) length and compare this to fetuses with intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Observationnal study including 989 fetuses: 912 eutrophic fetuses and 75 with IUGR. Strict quality control criteria were applied to CC measurements, which were taken in median sagittal section including the vermis. IFOD was measured along the same axis between the internal bone tables. IFOD/CC ratio was calculated and analyzed by pregnancy trimester. We compared the IFOD/CC ratio between eutrophic fetuses and those with IUGR, excluding cases with cerebral malformations or genetic disorders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>IFOD/CC ratio was, on average, 3.32 (±0.91) in the first trimester (< 21 GW) for 40 patients, 2.54 (±0.18) in the second trimester (21-30 GW) for 487 patients, and 2.47 (±0.08) in the third trimester (31-38 GW) for 385 patients. The ratio decreased proportionally with advancing pregnancy. The IFOD/CC ratio was 2.51 (±0.13) in eutrophic fetuses and 2.49 (±0.10) in fetuses with IUGR, with no significant difference between the two groups (Student's t-test, p value = 0.18).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was no significant difference between eutrophic fetuses and those with IUGR. This method appears to be quick and could offer an advantage over standard CC charts. It may also help minimize potential biases in detecting CC hypoplasia.</p>","PeriodicalId":15386,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Ultrasound","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.24057","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Aim to explore the feasibility of assessing the relationship between the internal cranial fronto-occipital diameter (IFOD) and corpus callosum (CC) length and compare this to fetuses with intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR).

Materials and methods: Observationnal study including 989 fetuses: 912 eutrophic fetuses and 75 with IUGR. Strict quality control criteria were applied to CC measurements, which were taken in median sagittal section including the vermis. IFOD was measured along the same axis between the internal bone tables. IFOD/CC ratio was calculated and analyzed by pregnancy trimester. We compared the IFOD/CC ratio between eutrophic fetuses and those with IUGR, excluding cases with cerebral malformations or genetic disorders.

Results: IFOD/CC ratio was, on average, 3.32 (±0.91) in the first trimester (< 21 GW) for 40 patients, 2.54 (±0.18) in the second trimester (21-30 GW) for 487 patients, and 2.47 (±0.08) in the third trimester (31-38 GW) for 385 patients. The ratio decreased proportionally with advancing pregnancy. The IFOD/CC ratio was 2.51 (±0.13) in eutrophic fetuses and 2.49 (±0.10) in fetuses with IUGR, with no significant difference between the two groups (Student's t-test, p value = 0.18).

Conclusion: There was no significant difference between eutrophic fetuses and those with IUGR. This method appears to be quick and could offer an advantage over standard CC charts. It may also help minimize potential biases in detecting CC hypoplasia.

颅内额枕直径/胼胝体长度比值对正常沉积和IUFGR产前超声的前瞻性评价。
前言:目的探讨评估颅内额枕直径(IFOD)与胼胝体(CC)长度关系的可行性,并将其与宫内生长受限(IUGR)胎儿进行比较。材料与方法:观察研究989例胎儿,912例富营养化胎儿,75例IUGR胎儿。CC测量采用严格的质量控制标准,在正中矢状面包括蚓部进行测量。沿内骨表之间的同一轴测量IFOD。按妊娠三个月计算并分析IFOD/CC比值。我们比较了富营养胎儿和IUGR胎儿的IFOD/CC比率,排除了脑畸形或遗传疾病的病例。结果:IFOD/CC比值在妊娠早期平均为3.32(±0.91)。结论:富营养化胎儿与IUGR无显著性差异。这种方法看起来很快,并且比标准的CC图表更有优势。它也可能有助于减少检测CC发育不全的潜在偏差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
248
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Ultrasound (JCU) is an international journal dedicated to the worldwide dissemination of scientific information on diagnostic and therapeutic applications of medical sonography. The scope of the journal includes--but is not limited to--the following areas: sonography of the gastrointestinal tract, genitourinary tract, vascular system, nervous system, head and neck, chest, breast, musculoskeletal system, and other superficial structures; Doppler applications; obstetric and pediatric applications; and interventional sonography. Studies comparing sonography with other imaging modalities are encouraged, as are studies evaluating the economic impact of sonography. Also within the journal''s scope are innovations and improvements in instrumentation and examination techniques and the use of contrast agents. JCU publishes original research articles, case reports, pictorial essays, technical notes, and letters to the editor. The journal is also dedicated to being an educational resource for its readers, through the publication of review articles and various scientific contributions from members of the editorial board and other world-renowned experts in sonography.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信