Role of ureteral wall thickness and computed tomography imaging in predicting spontaneous passage of ureteral stones.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Özlem Kadırhan, Sonay Aydın, Ercüment Keskin, Mecit Kantarcı
{"title":"Role of ureteral wall thickness and computed tomography imaging in predicting spontaneous passage of ureteral stones.","authors":"Özlem Kadırhan, Sonay Aydın, Ercüment Keskin, Mecit Kantarcı","doi":"10.4274/dir.2025.253304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Urolithiasis is a common health problem with a high recurrence rate, and effectively balancing follow-up with intervention is important for patient safety. In this context, our study aims to identify criteria that can predict the likelihood of spontaneous passage (SP) of ureteral stones.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was performed on 2,773 patients who presented to our hospital with renal colic over a 4-year period. The study included 897 patients with unilateral ureteral stones measuring ≤10 mm, identified using non-contrast computed tomography, and inflammatory serum markers assessed through biochemical testing. Variables analyzed to predict the likelihood of SP included stone size, lateralization and location, ureteral wall thickness (UWT) at the stone site, stone density, degree of hydronephrosis (HN), ureteral length, parenchymal thickness and density, and various biochemical parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>It was determined that the SP of ureteral stones was considerably affected by larger stone size (right >6.5 mm, left >6 mm), higher stone density (>957 Hounsfield units), increased UWT (>1.7 mm), presence of high-grade HN (grade ≥2), and elevated neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (>2.15) and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) (>10.28) values in blood. No statistically significant relationship was observed between SP and ureteral length, renal parenchymal thickness, or renal parenchymal density. It was found that when the UWT at the level of the ureteral stone exceeded 1.7 mm, the risk of the stone not passing spontaneously increased by 706.5 times in univariate logistic regression (LR) analysis and by 337.9 times in multivariate LR analysis compared with individuals with a wall thickness below this threshold.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study demonstrated that, in addition to stone size and location, increased UWT at the stone level, higher stone density, the presence of concomitant high-grade HN, and elevated NLR and PLR values in the blood could be used as criteria to determine the likelihood of SP of ureteral stones. According to our results, UWT was shown to be a stronger risk factor for failure of SP than stone size.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>The findings indicate that wall thickness around ureteral stones is a risk factor with a higher negative predictive value for SP than the stone size and location.</p>","PeriodicalId":11341,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic and interventional radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic and interventional radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/dir.2025.253304","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Urolithiasis is a common health problem with a high recurrence rate, and effectively balancing follow-up with intervention is important for patient safety. In this context, our study aims to identify criteria that can predict the likelihood of spontaneous passage (SP) of ureteral stones.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 2,773 patients who presented to our hospital with renal colic over a 4-year period. The study included 897 patients with unilateral ureteral stones measuring ≤10 mm, identified using non-contrast computed tomography, and inflammatory serum markers assessed through biochemical testing. Variables analyzed to predict the likelihood of SP included stone size, lateralization and location, ureteral wall thickness (UWT) at the stone site, stone density, degree of hydronephrosis (HN), ureteral length, parenchymal thickness and density, and various biochemical parameters.

Results: It was determined that the SP of ureteral stones was considerably affected by larger stone size (right >6.5 mm, left >6 mm), higher stone density (>957 Hounsfield units), increased UWT (>1.7 mm), presence of high-grade HN (grade ≥2), and elevated neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (>2.15) and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) (>10.28) values in blood. No statistically significant relationship was observed between SP and ureteral length, renal parenchymal thickness, or renal parenchymal density. It was found that when the UWT at the level of the ureteral stone exceeded 1.7 mm, the risk of the stone not passing spontaneously increased by 706.5 times in univariate logistic regression (LR) analysis and by 337.9 times in multivariate LR analysis compared with individuals with a wall thickness below this threshold.

Conclusion: Our study demonstrated that, in addition to stone size and location, increased UWT at the stone level, higher stone density, the presence of concomitant high-grade HN, and elevated NLR and PLR values in the blood could be used as criteria to determine the likelihood of SP of ureteral stones. According to our results, UWT was shown to be a stronger risk factor for failure of SP than stone size.

Clinical significance: The findings indicate that wall thickness around ureteral stones is a risk factor with a higher negative predictive value for SP than the stone size and location.

输尿管壁厚度和计算机断层成像在预测输尿管结石自发通过中的作用。
目的:尿石症是一种常见的健康问题,复发率高,有效平衡随访与干预对患者安全至关重要。在这种情况下,我们的研究旨在确定可以预测输尿管结石自发通过(SP)可能性的标准。方法:回顾性分析我院4年来因肾绞痛就诊的2773例患者。该研究纳入897例单侧输尿管结石≤10 mm的患者,通过非对比计算机断层扫描识别,并通过生化检测评估炎症血清标志物。预测SP可能性的变量包括结石大小、侧边及位置、结石部位输尿管壁厚度(UWT)、结石密度、肾积水程度(HN)、输尿管长度、实质厚度和密度以及各种生化参数。结果:确定输尿管结石的SP受较大结石大小(右侧>6.5 mm,左侧>6 mm)、较高结石密度(>957 Hounsfield单位)、UWT增加(>1.7 mm)、高级别HN(分级≥2)、血液中中性粒细胞淋巴细胞比(NLR)(>2.15)和血小板淋巴细胞比(PLR)(>10.28)升高的显著影响。SP与输尿管长度、肾实质厚度、肾实质密度无统计学意义。结果发现,当输尿管结石水平的UWT超过1.7 mm时,与壁厚低于该阈值的个体相比,单因素logistic回归(LR)分析中结石不自行排出的风险增加了706.5倍,多因素LR分析中增加了337.9倍。结论:我们的研究表明,除了结石的大小和位置外,结石水平的UWT增加、结石密度升高、伴发高级别HN、血液中NLR和PLR值升高可作为判断输尿管结石SP可能性的标准。根据我们的结果,UWT被证明是比结石大小更大的SP失败的危险因素。临床意义:研究结果提示输尿管结石周围壁厚是SP的危险因素,其阴性预测值高于结石大小和位置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diagnostic and interventional radiology
Diagnostic and interventional radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
自引率
4.80%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (Diagn Interv Radiol) is the open access, online-only official publication of Turkish Society of Radiology. It is published bimonthly and the journal’s publication language is English. The journal is a medium for original articles, reviews, pictorial essays, technical notes related to all fields of diagnostic and interventional radiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信