Optimising long-term management in acute asthma presentations to the emergency department: an interview study on patient beliefs.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Imogen P Skene, Raine Astin-Chamberlain, Katharine C Pike, Chris Griffiths, Liz Steed, Paul E Pfeffer
{"title":"Optimising long-term management in acute asthma presentations to the emergency department: an interview study on patient beliefs.","authors":"Imogen P Skene, Raine Astin-Chamberlain, Katharine C Pike, Chris Griffiths, Liz Steed, Paul E Pfeffer","doi":"10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emergency department (ED) attendances with acute asthma are an opportunity for simple medication changes to improve long-term self-management, but patients' beliefs and behaviours need to be considered for interventions to be successful. We explored the health beliefs and behaviours of adult patients who have presented to the ED with asthma and considered their attitudes to ED-based interventions designed to improve long-term asthma control.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>19 semi-structured face-to-face or online patient interviews were conducted in 2021/2022. Eligible participants were patients over age 16 who had attended and were discharged from the ED with an asthma exacerbation. Purposive sampling was undertaken to ensure representation of patients of different ages, ethnicity and gender. Interviews were analysed with reflective thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Themes that reflected the beliefs and behaviours of the patients were: (1) experiences of an asthma exacerbation-the emotional response and self-management during an episode; (2) discharge dilemma-expectations and communication on discharge from ED, impacted by time, language and capacity in the acute environment; (3) do what is best for me-openness to change such as of medication, if rationale and support is provided; and (4) perceptions of asthma medication-reliance on salbutamol, concerns about inhaled corticosteroids, openness to maintenance and reliever therapy inhalers and device preferences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients do not expect longer-term care to be provided in the ED. However, patients trust healthcare professionals to recommend appropriate treatment and are willing to accept a change in medication or inhaler device in this context.</p>","PeriodicalId":9048,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12258288/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002962","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Emergency department (ED) attendances with acute asthma are an opportunity for simple medication changes to improve long-term self-management, but patients' beliefs and behaviours need to be considered for interventions to be successful. We explored the health beliefs and behaviours of adult patients who have presented to the ED with asthma and considered their attitudes to ED-based interventions designed to improve long-term asthma control.

Methods: 19 semi-structured face-to-face or online patient interviews were conducted in 2021/2022. Eligible participants were patients over age 16 who had attended and were discharged from the ED with an asthma exacerbation. Purposive sampling was undertaken to ensure representation of patients of different ages, ethnicity and gender. Interviews were analysed with reflective thematic analysis.

Results: Themes that reflected the beliefs and behaviours of the patients were: (1) experiences of an asthma exacerbation-the emotional response and self-management during an episode; (2) discharge dilemma-expectations and communication on discharge from ED, impacted by time, language and capacity in the acute environment; (3) do what is best for me-openness to change such as of medication, if rationale and support is provided; and (4) perceptions of asthma medication-reliance on salbutamol, concerns about inhaled corticosteroids, openness to maintenance and reliever therapy inhalers and device preferences.

Conclusion: Patients do not expect longer-term care to be provided in the ED. However, patients trust healthcare professionals to recommend appropriate treatment and are willing to accept a change in medication or inhaler device in this context.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

优化长期管理急性哮喘的表现到急诊科:对病人信念的访谈研究。
背景:急诊科(ED)的急性哮喘就诊是一个简单的药物改变改善长期自我管理的机会,但干预措施的成功需要考虑患者的信念和行为。我们探讨了到ED就诊的哮喘成年患者的健康信念和行为,并考虑了他们对以ED为基础的干预措施的态度,这些干预措施旨在改善长期哮喘控制。方法:在2021/2022年对患者进行了19次半结构化的面对面或在线访谈。符合条件的参与者是16岁以上的患者,他们曾在急诊科就诊并因哮喘加重而出院。进行了有目的的抽样,以确保不同年龄,种族和性别的患者的代表性。访谈采用反思性专题分析进行分析。结果:反映患者信念和行为的主题是:(1)哮喘发作经历-发作期间的情绪反应和自我管理;(2)出院困境——急症环境中受时间、语言和能力影响的急症患者出院时的期望和沟通;(3)做对自己最有利的事——如果有理由和支持,愿意接受改变,比如药物治疗;(4)对哮喘药物的认知-对沙丁胺醇的依赖,对吸入皮质类固醇的担忧,对维持和缓解治疗吸入器的开放程度和设备偏好。结论:患者不期望在急诊科提供长期护理。然而,患者相信医疗保健专业人员会推荐适当的治疗方法,并愿意在这种情况下接受药物或吸入器装置的改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
BMJ Open Respiratory Research RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
95
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open Respiratory Research is a peer-reviewed, open access journal publishing respiratory and critical care medicine. It is the sister journal to Thorax and co-owned by the British Thoracic Society and BMJ. The journal focuses on robustness of methodology and scientific rigour with less emphasis on novelty or perceived impact. BMJ Open Respiratory Research operates a rapid review process, with continuous publication online, ensuring timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal publishes review articles and all research study types: Basic science including laboratory based experiments and animal models, Pilot studies or proof of concept, Observational studies, Study protocols, Registries, Clinical trials from phase I to multicentre randomised clinical trials, Systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信