Time to revise: impact of methodology on boar sperm capacitation in vitro via phosphotyrosine patterns.

IF 2.3 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Barbora Klusackova, Aneta Pilsova, Natalie Zelenkova, Zuzana Pilsova, Romana Krejcirova, Eva Chmelikova, Katerina Komrskova, Ondrej Simonik, Pavla Postlerova
{"title":"Time to revise: impact of methodology on boar sperm capacitation in vitro via phosphotyrosine patterns.","authors":"Barbora Klusackova, Aneta Pilsova, Natalie Zelenkova, Zuzana Pilsova, Romana Krejcirova, Eva Chmelikova, Katerina Komrskova, Ondrej Simonik, Pavla Postlerova","doi":"10.1186/s12917-025-04900-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Capacitation is a crucial sperm maturation process occurring in vivo in the female reproductive tract, enabling spermatozoa to fertilize the oocyte. In vitro, capacitation can be induced using defined capacitation media (CM), with further assessment of protein tyrosine phosphorylation (PTyr) patterns widely used as a marker to evaluate sperm capacitation. This review critically examines the factors influencing PTyr detection in boar spermatozoa variability introduced by different methodological approaches. Discrepancies in PTyr patterns may be a result of different sperm handling, including preservation methods, selection techniques, and capacitation protocols. Semen extenders, which may contain unknown components, can affect the variability in capacitation status. Selection techniques commonly employed to isolate viable spermatozoa may initiate different capacitation regulatory pathways, resulting in variability in analyzed sperm subpopulations and inconsistencies in PTyr detection. Similarly, the lack of standardization in CM composition significantly impacts capacitation outcomes. Fixation protocols further increase variability in PTyr pattern detection, as aldehydic fixatives potentially alter protein structures, while alcohol-based fixatives cause protein aggregation and plasma membrane disruption. While PTyr immunofluorescence remains a valuable tool for capacitation assessment, its reliability is limited by methodological variability. Mimicking in vivo conditions is crucial, and even minor modifications in the sperm capacitation process may provide inconsistent results in PTyr patterns across studies. This review offers valuable insights into often-disregarded methodological details and highlights the need for improved for better standardization of capacitation protocols. The uniform methodological approach improves reproducibility and reliability in capacitation studies and stimulates further investigation leading to the discovery of alternative additional markers to determine the capacitation status in mammalian spermatozoa.</p>","PeriodicalId":9041,"journal":{"name":"BMC Veterinary Research","volume":"21 1","pages":"448"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12232637/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Veterinary Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-025-04900-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Capacitation is a crucial sperm maturation process occurring in vivo in the female reproductive tract, enabling spermatozoa to fertilize the oocyte. In vitro, capacitation can be induced using defined capacitation media (CM), with further assessment of protein tyrosine phosphorylation (PTyr) patterns widely used as a marker to evaluate sperm capacitation. This review critically examines the factors influencing PTyr detection in boar spermatozoa variability introduced by different methodological approaches. Discrepancies in PTyr patterns may be a result of different sperm handling, including preservation methods, selection techniques, and capacitation protocols. Semen extenders, which may contain unknown components, can affect the variability in capacitation status. Selection techniques commonly employed to isolate viable spermatozoa may initiate different capacitation regulatory pathways, resulting in variability in analyzed sperm subpopulations and inconsistencies in PTyr detection. Similarly, the lack of standardization in CM composition significantly impacts capacitation outcomes. Fixation protocols further increase variability in PTyr pattern detection, as aldehydic fixatives potentially alter protein structures, while alcohol-based fixatives cause protein aggregation and plasma membrane disruption. While PTyr immunofluorescence remains a valuable tool for capacitation assessment, its reliability is limited by methodological variability. Mimicking in vivo conditions is crucial, and even minor modifications in the sperm capacitation process may provide inconsistent results in PTyr patterns across studies. This review offers valuable insights into often-disregarded methodological details and highlights the need for improved for better standardization of capacitation protocols. The uniform methodological approach improves reproducibility and reliability in capacitation studies and stimulates further investigation leading to the discovery of alternative additional markers to determine the capacitation status in mammalian spermatozoa.

修订时间:方法对猪精子体外磷酸化酪氨酸模式获能的影响。
获能是一个重要的精子成熟过程,发生在雌性生殖道体内,使精子能够与卵母细胞受精。在体外,可以使用定义的获能介质(CM)诱导获能,进一步评估蛋白酪氨酸磷酸化(PTyr)模式被广泛用作评估精子获能的标记。本文综述了不同方法学方法对猪精子中PTyr检测的影响因素。PTyr模式的差异可能是不同精子处理的结果,包括保存方法、选择技术和获能方案。精液扩展剂可能含有未知成分,可影响获能状态的可变性。通常用于分离活精子的选择技术可能启动不同的获能调节途径,从而导致分析的精子亚群的差异和PTyr检测的不一致。同样,CM成分缺乏标准化也会显著影响获能结果。固定方案进一步增加了PTyr模式检测的可变性,因为醛类固定剂可能改变蛋白质结构,而醇基固定剂会导致蛋白质聚集和质膜破坏。虽然PTyr免疫荧光仍然是一种有价值的能力评估工具,但其可靠性受到方法可变性的限制。模仿体内条件是至关重要的,即使精子获能过程中的微小修改也可能在不同的研究中提供不一致的PTyr模式结果。这篇综述为经常被忽视的方法细节提供了有价值的见解,并强调了改进使能方案更好地标准化的必要性。统一的方法方法提高了能化研究的可重复性和可靠性,并促进了进一步的研究,从而发现了确定哺乳动物精子能化状态的其他标记。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Veterinary Research
BMC Veterinary Research VETERINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
420
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Veterinary Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of veterinary science and medicine, including the epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention and treatment of medical conditions of domestic, companion, farm and wild animals, as well as the biomedical processes that underlie their health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信