Superiority of pan-immune inflammation value, systemic inflammation index, and CALLY scores prognostic value for mortality of ischemic stroke patients followed in intensive care unit.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
Gülsüm Altuntaş, Rahmet Yıldırım, İsmail Demirel
{"title":"Superiority of pan-immune inflammation value, systemic inflammation index, and CALLY scores prognostic value for mortality of ischemic stroke patients followed in intensive care unit.","authors":"Gülsüm Altuntaş, Rahmet Yıldırım, İsmail Demirel","doi":"10.1186/s12865-025-00730-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The Inflammatory response plays an important role in the pathophysiology and prognosis of ischemic stroke. Hyperinflammation progresses with aggravation of brain damage and deterioration in clinical status. The study aimed to demonstrate a valuable, easy-to-obtain, and inexpensive parameter for prognostic assessment by comparing the Pan-immune Inflammation Value (PIV), Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII), and CALLY scores in patients with ischemic stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective single-center cohort study, the files of patients who were followed up with a diagnosis of ischemic stroke in the tertiary intensive care units. Multivariate regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic curves(ROC) were used to detect the association between PIV, SII, and CALLY on in-hospital mortality and their superiority over each other in predicting mortality in ischemic stroke patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1,039 patients, 453 died, resulting in an overall survival rate of 56.4%. In the multivariate analysis, high APACHE II scores and low albumin levels remained independent risk factors. ROC curves showed that PIV, SII, and CALLY exhibited good predictive values, with AUCs of 0.921, 0.887, and 0.930 (95% CI: 0.903-0.936, 0.855-0.896, 0.913-0.945; p < 0.001). A pairwise comparison of the data based on AUC values indicated a significant difference between SII and both PIV and CALLY (p < 0.001). In contrast, no significant difference was found between PIV and CALLY (p = 0.385).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PIV, SII, and CALLY indices serve as accessible and reliable prognostic biomarkers that can enhance personalized treatment strategies and improve clinical decision-making in patients with ischemic stroke.</p>","PeriodicalId":9040,"journal":{"name":"BMC Immunology","volume":"26 1","pages":"49"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12235825/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12865-025-00730-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: The Inflammatory response plays an important role in the pathophysiology and prognosis of ischemic stroke. Hyperinflammation progresses with aggravation of brain damage and deterioration in clinical status. The study aimed to demonstrate a valuable, easy-to-obtain, and inexpensive parameter for prognostic assessment by comparing the Pan-immune Inflammation Value (PIV), Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII), and CALLY scores in patients with ischemic stroke.

Methods: In this retrospective single-center cohort study, the files of patients who were followed up with a diagnosis of ischemic stroke in the tertiary intensive care units. Multivariate regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic curves(ROC) were used to detect the association between PIV, SII, and CALLY on in-hospital mortality and their superiority over each other in predicting mortality in ischemic stroke patients.

Results: Of 1,039 patients, 453 died, resulting in an overall survival rate of 56.4%. In the multivariate analysis, high APACHE II scores and low albumin levels remained independent risk factors. ROC curves showed that PIV, SII, and CALLY exhibited good predictive values, with AUCs of 0.921, 0.887, and 0.930 (95% CI: 0.903-0.936, 0.855-0.896, 0.913-0.945; p < 0.001). A pairwise comparison of the data based on AUC values indicated a significant difference between SII and both PIV and CALLY (p < 0.001). In contrast, no significant difference was found between PIV and CALLY (p = 0.385).

Conclusion: The PIV, SII, and CALLY indices serve as accessible and reliable prognostic biomarkers that can enhance personalized treatment strategies and improve clinical decision-making in patients with ischemic stroke.

泛免疫炎症值、全身炎症指数、CALLY评分对重症监护病房缺血性脑卒中患者死亡率预后价值的优越性
目的:炎症反应在缺血性脑卒中的病理生理和预后中起重要作用。随着脑损伤的加重和临床状况的恶化,高炎症不断发展。该研究旨在通过比较缺血性卒中患者的泛免疫炎症值(PIV)、全身免疫炎症指数(SII)和CALLY评分,证明一种有价值、易于获得且价格低廉的预后评估参数。方法:在本回顾性单中心队列研究中,对三级重症监护病房诊断为缺血性脑卒中的患者进行随访。采用多因素回归分析和受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)检测PIV、SII和CALLY对住院死亡率的相关性,以及它们在预测缺血性脑卒中患者死亡率方面的优越性。结果:1039例患者中,死亡453例,总生存率为56.4%。在多变量分析中,高APACHE II评分和低白蛋白水平仍然是独立的危险因素。ROC曲线显示PIV、SII和CALLY具有较好的预测价值,auc分别为0.921、0.887和0.930 (95% CI: 0.903 ~ 0.936、0.855 ~ 0.896、0.913 ~ 0.945;结论:PIV、SII和CALLY指标可作为可获得和可靠的预后生物标志物,可增强缺血性脑卒中患者的个性化治疗策略和改善临床决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Immunology
BMC Immunology 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Immunology is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in molecular, cellular, tissue-level, organismal, functional, and developmental aspects of the immune system as well as clinical studies and animal models of human diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信