Melissa Packer West, Joshua D Miller, Donald R Lynam
{"title":"Measurement Invariance of the Five-Factor Narcissism Inventory-Short Form According to Psychological Treatment History.","authors":"Melissa Packer West, Joshua D Miller, Donald R Lynam","doi":"10.1177/10731911251349020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Five-Factor Narcissism Inventory-Short Form (FFNI-SF) is the only extant scale that efficiently measures narcissism at the three-factor level (antagonism, agentic extraversion, and narcissistic neuroticism). Individuals with significant narcissistic dysfunction are frequently seen in clinical settings. However, there has been limited testing of measurement invariance (MI) in narcissism measures, especially multifaceted ones, across clinical and nonclinical groups. This study examined whether the FFNI-SF operates equivalently across individuals with and without a psychological treatment history. Using exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM), we tested MI at four levels-configural, metric, scalar, and residual-in 473 community participants, 36% of whom had a psychological treatment history, current and/or lifetime. Results indicated scalar and residual invariance, suggesting that the FFNI-SF is valid for comparing narcissism traits at both the latent and observed score levels between treatment history groups. Latent mean comparisons revealed that individuals with a treatment history scored significantly lower on antagonism and higher on neuroticism compared to those without a treatment history. These findings highlight that narcissism's underlying dimensions may manifest differently in clinical samples and support the FFNI-SF as a viable multidimensional measure for capturing nuanced expressions of narcissistic traits across clinical and nonclinical contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":8577,"journal":{"name":"Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"10731911251349020"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911251349020","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Five-Factor Narcissism Inventory-Short Form (FFNI-SF) is the only extant scale that efficiently measures narcissism at the three-factor level (antagonism, agentic extraversion, and narcissistic neuroticism). Individuals with significant narcissistic dysfunction are frequently seen in clinical settings. However, there has been limited testing of measurement invariance (MI) in narcissism measures, especially multifaceted ones, across clinical and nonclinical groups. This study examined whether the FFNI-SF operates equivalently across individuals with and without a psychological treatment history. Using exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM), we tested MI at four levels-configural, metric, scalar, and residual-in 473 community participants, 36% of whom had a psychological treatment history, current and/or lifetime. Results indicated scalar and residual invariance, suggesting that the FFNI-SF is valid for comparing narcissism traits at both the latent and observed score levels between treatment history groups. Latent mean comparisons revealed that individuals with a treatment history scored significantly lower on antagonism and higher on neuroticism compared to those without a treatment history. These findings highlight that narcissism's underlying dimensions may manifest differently in clinical samples and support the FFNI-SF as a viable multidimensional measure for capturing nuanced expressions of narcissistic traits across clinical and nonclinical contexts.
期刊介绍:
Assessment publishes articles in the domain of applied clinical assessment. The emphasis of this journal is on publication of information of relevance to the use of assessment measures, including test development, validation, and interpretation practices. The scope of the journal includes research that can inform assessment practices in mental health, forensic, medical, and other applied settings. Papers that focus on the assessment of cognitive and neuropsychological functioning, personality, and psychopathology are invited. Most papers published in Assessment report the results of original empirical research, however integrative review articles and scholarly case studies will also be considered.