Omalizumab home injection versus hospital administration in severe asthma: Impact on asthma control.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY
Bahar Arslan, Gulden Pacaci Cetin, Serhat Seker, Hatice Eylul Bozkurt Yilmaz, Elif Aktas Yapici, Serpil Koyluce, Elif Acar, Tugba Ertugrul, Murat Turk, Insu Yilmaz
{"title":"Omalizumab home injection versus hospital administration in severe asthma: Impact on asthma control.","authors":"Bahar Arslan, Gulden Pacaci Cetin, Serhat Seker, Hatice Eylul Bozkurt Yilmaz, Elif Aktas Yapici, Serpil Koyluce, Elif Acar, Tugba Ertugrul, Murat Turk, Insu Yilmaz","doi":"10.2500/aap.2025.46.250021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Initial studies recommended that omalizumab be administered by health-care professionals. However, subsequent research revealed that the prevalence of anaphylaxis after subcutaneous omalizumab injections was only 0.09%. <b>Objective:</b> In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effects of omalizumab self-administration at home compared with hospital administration on asthma control. <b>Method:</b> Medical records of 45 patients diagnosed with severe atopic asthma, treated with omalizumab in our clinic, and subsequently transitioned to self-injection at home after appropriate training were retrospectively reviewed. These patients were monitored regularly for at least 1 year before and after the transition. The asthma control level was assessed by using the Asthma Control Test (ACT). <b>Results:</b> The ACT score average 1 year after home use was significantly higher than 1 year before home use (0.047); however, the scores before and after 6 months and 3 months home use were similar. A significant reduction in the number of exacerbations was observed after home medication use (p = 0.050), whereas no significant differences were detected in systemic steroid use or emergency admissions. The presence of eosinophilia and comorbidities did not significantly affect periodic ACT values after home use. <b>Conclusion:</b> Our study demonstrated the safety and efficacy of omalizumab for home administration in patients with severe atopic asthma, and it should be emphasized that proper patient selection and training are crucial to ensure the safety of home therapy. It is effective in both symptom control and prevention of exacerbations, and the effectiveness of home use was not diminished by the presence of comorbidities or eosinophilia compared with hospital use.</p>","PeriodicalId":7646,"journal":{"name":"Allergy and asthma proceedings","volume":"46 4","pages":"274-279"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Allergy and asthma proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2500/aap.2025.46.250021","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Initial studies recommended that omalizumab be administered by health-care professionals. However, subsequent research revealed that the prevalence of anaphylaxis after subcutaneous omalizumab injections was only 0.09%. Objective: In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effects of omalizumab self-administration at home compared with hospital administration on asthma control. Method: Medical records of 45 patients diagnosed with severe atopic asthma, treated with omalizumab in our clinic, and subsequently transitioned to self-injection at home after appropriate training were retrospectively reviewed. These patients were monitored regularly for at least 1 year before and after the transition. The asthma control level was assessed by using the Asthma Control Test (ACT). Results: The ACT score average 1 year after home use was significantly higher than 1 year before home use (0.047); however, the scores before and after 6 months and 3 months home use were similar. A significant reduction in the number of exacerbations was observed after home medication use (p = 0.050), whereas no significant differences were detected in systemic steroid use or emergency admissions. The presence of eosinophilia and comorbidities did not significantly affect periodic ACT values after home use. Conclusion: Our study demonstrated the safety and efficacy of omalizumab for home administration in patients with severe atopic asthma, and it should be emphasized that proper patient selection and training are crucial to ensure the safety of home therapy. It is effective in both symptom control and prevention of exacerbations, and the effectiveness of home use was not diminished by the presence of comorbidities or eosinophilia compared with hospital use.

重度哮喘家庭注射与医院给药:对哮喘控制的影响
背景:最初的研究建议由卫生保健专业人员使用omalizumab。然而,随后的研究显示,皮下注射奥玛珠单抗后过敏反应的患病率仅为0.09%。目的:在本研究中,我们旨在评估omalizumab在家自我给药与医院给药对哮喘控制的影响。方法:回顾性分析我院收治的45例重度特应性哮喘患者的病历,这些患者在我院接受奥玛单抗治疗后,经过适当的培训后转为在家自行注射。这些患者在转换前后至少进行1年的定期监测。采用哮喘控制试验(asthma control Test, ACT)评估哮喘控制水平。结果:家用后1年ACT平均分显著高于家用前1年(0.047);然而,6个月和3个月家庭使用前后的得分相似。在家庭用药后,观察到急性发作次数显著减少(p = 0.050),而在全身类固醇使用或急诊入院方面没有发现显著差异。嗜酸性粒细胞增多和合并症的存在对家庭使用后的周期性ACT值没有显著影响。结论:我们的研究证明了omalizumab用于重度特应性哮喘患者家庭给药的安全性和有效性,需要强调的是,正确的患者选择和培训对于确保家庭治疗的安全性至关重要。它在症状控制和预防恶化方面都是有效的,与医院使用相比,家庭使用的有效性不会因合并症或嗜酸性粒细胞增多而降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
35.70%
发文量
106
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Allergy & Asthma Proceedings is a peer reviewed publication dedicated to distributing timely scientific research regarding advancements in the knowledge and practice of allergy, asthma and immunology. Its primary readership consists of allergists and pulmonologists. The goal of the Proceedings is to publish articles with a predominantly clinical focus which directly impact quality of care for patients with allergic disease and asthma. Featured topics include asthma, rhinitis, sinusitis, food allergies, allergic skin diseases, diagnostic techniques, allergens, and treatment modalities. Published material includes peer-reviewed original research, clinical trials and review articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信