Huilin He, Li Zhu, Xiaohong Chen, Qingli Jiang, Yeping Li, Ke Jing, Fang He, Yuwei Yang
{"title":"Efficacy of Stamp Skin Grafting to Promote the Healing Process of Chronic Wounds.","authors":"Huilin He, Li Zhu, Xiaohong Chen, Qingli Jiang, Yeping Li, Ke Jing, Fang He, Yuwei Yang","doi":"10.1097/ASW.0000000000000314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the clinical efficacy of stamp skin grafting in promoting wound healing for patients with chronic wounds.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study enrolled 86 patients with chronic wounds from a wound care clinic between November 2022 and December 2023. The participants were randomly allocated into the control (n = 44) and skin-grafting (n = 42) groups using a preset random number table. The control group received conventional wet dressing care, whereas the skin-grafting group underwent additional stamp skin-grafting care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The skin-grafting group demonstrated significantly reduced wound healing time, improved healing efficacy, decreased dressing change frequency, and lowered dressing change costs compared with the control group (all Ps < .05). During the nursing process, the skin-grafting group exhibited significantly lower pretreatment Numeric Rating Scale scores when the fourth and fifth dressings were changed and during-treatment Visual Analog Scale scores from the third to fifth dressing changes compared with the control group (all Ps < .05). After adjusting for confounding factors, wound area served as an independent risk factor for both healing time (rpartial = 0.457, P < .05) and healing efficacy (β = -0.559, P < .05) in the skin-grafting group, whereas patient adherence to wound care served as an independent risk factor for both healing time (rpartial = 0.333, P < .05) and healing efficacy (β = 1.194, P < .05) in the control group, as well as for healing efficacy (β = 1.318, P < .05) in the skin-grafting group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Stamp skin grafting effectively promotes the rapid recovery of chronic wounds with reduced medical burden and patient pain. The effectiveness primarily depends on the wound area and patient adherence.</p>","PeriodicalId":7489,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Skin & Wound Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Skin & Wound Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ASW.0000000000000314","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the clinical efficacy of stamp skin grafting in promoting wound healing for patients with chronic wounds.
Methods: This study enrolled 86 patients with chronic wounds from a wound care clinic between November 2022 and December 2023. The participants were randomly allocated into the control (n = 44) and skin-grafting (n = 42) groups using a preset random number table. The control group received conventional wet dressing care, whereas the skin-grafting group underwent additional stamp skin-grafting care.
Results: The skin-grafting group demonstrated significantly reduced wound healing time, improved healing efficacy, decreased dressing change frequency, and lowered dressing change costs compared with the control group (all Ps < .05). During the nursing process, the skin-grafting group exhibited significantly lower pretreatment Numeric Rating Scale scores when the fourth and fifth dressings were changed and during-treatment Visual Analog Scale scores from the third to fifth dressing changes compared with the control group (all Ps < .05). After adjusting for confounding factors, wound area served as an independent risk factor for both healing time (rpartial = 0.457, P < .05) and healing efficacy (β = -0.559, P < .05) in the skin-grafting group, whereas patient adherence to wound care served as an independent risk factor for both healing time (rpartial = 0.333, P < .05) and healing efficacy (β = 1.194, P < .05) in the control group, as well as for healing efficacy (β = 1.318, P < .05) in the skin-grafting group.
Conclusions: Stamp skin grafting effectively promotes the rapid recovery of chronic wounds with reduced medical burden and patient pain. The effectiveness primarily depends on the wound area and patient adherence.
期刊介绍:
A peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal, Advances in Skin & Wound Care is highly regarded for its unique balance of cutting-edge original research and practical clinical management articles on wounds and other problems of skin integrity. Each issue features CME/CE for physicians and nurses, the first journal in the field to regularly offer continuing education for both disciplines.