Modified neurologic examination is feasible in healthy Puerto Rican crested toads (Peltophryne lemur).

IF 1.3 3区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Anastasia E Towe, Gretel Tovar-Lopez, Lisa Bartner
{"title":"Modified neurologic examination is feasible in healthy Puerto Rican crested toads (Peltophryne lemur).","authors":"Anastasia E Towe, Gretel Tovar-Lopez, Lisa Bartner","doi":"10.2460/ajvr.25.02.0050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate commonly used neurologic tests in mammals, reptiles, and birds and establish expected results in Puerto Rican crested toads to generate recommendations for toad-specific neurologic examinations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A breeding population of healthy Puerto Rican crested toads (Peltophryne lemur) was used in April 2024. Neurologic examination based on standard tests described in other species was performed on each individual. Test feasibility and outcome were recorded independently by 3 observers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve toads were included. Tests with poor feasibility included respiratory rate (successfully completed in 17% [2 of 12] of toads) and swallowing (8% [1 of 12]). Many tests had absent or inconsistent outcomes, or lack of consensus between observers, including menace response (present in 55% [6 of 11]), ocular tracking (present in 0% [0 of 11]), pupillary light reflex (present in 8% [1 of 11]), physiologic nystagmus (present in 0% [0 of 12]), corneal sensation in response to air (present in 50% [5 of 10]), oculocardiac reflex (present in 36% [4 of 11]), tactile placing (present in 67% [6 of 9]), skin twitch (present in 0% [0 of 12]), and patellar reflex (present in 0% [0 of 12]). The most consistent tests, where test completion and the expected result were 100% successful as determined by all observers, were palpebral reflex, nasocortical and facial stimulation, corneal sensation (direct contact), hemiwalking, wheelbarrow, and pelvic limb withdrawal.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Some neurologic tests used in other species are potentially useful in Puerto Rican crested toads. Tests with low feasibility or inconsistent results should be given lower priority.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>A toad-specific neurologic examination protocol is outlined minimizing stress and enhancing neurolocalization. However, differences between species may impact results.</p>","PeriodicalId":7754,"journal":{"name":"American journal of veterinary research","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of veterinary research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.25.02.0050","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate commonly used neurologic tests in mammals, reptiles, and birds and establish expected results in Puerto Rican crested toads to generate recommendations for toad-specific neurologic examinations.

Methods: A breeding population of healthy Puerto Rican crested toads (Peltophryne lemur) was used in April 2024. Neurologic examination based on standard tests described in other species was performed on each individual. Test feasibility and outcome were recorded independently by 3 observers.

Results: Twelve toads were included. Tests with poor feasibility included respiratory rate (successfully completed in 17% [2 of 12] of toads) and swallowing (8% [1 of 12]). Many tests had absent or inconsistent outcomes, or lack of consensus between observers, including menace response (present in 55% [6 of 11]), ocular tracking (present in 0% [0 of 11]), pupillary light reflex (present in 8% [1 of 11]), physiologic nystagmus (present in 0% [0 of 12]), corneal sensation in response to air (present in 50% [5 of 10]), oculocardiac reflex (present in 36% [4 of 11]), tactile placing (present in 67% [6 of 9]), skin twitch (present in 0% [0 of 12]), and patellar reflex (present in 0% [0 of 12]). The most consistent tests, where test completion and the expected result were 100% successful as determined by all observers, were palpebral reflex, nasocortical and facial stimulation, corneal sensation (direct contact), hemiwalking, wheelbarrow, and pelvic limb withdrawal.

Conclusions: Some neurologic tests used in other species are potentially useful in Puerto Rican crested toads. Tests with low feasibility or inconsistent results should be given lower priority.

Clinical relevance: A toad-specific neurologic examination protocol is outlined minimizing stress and enhancing neurolocalization. However, differences between species may impact results.

改良神经系统检查是可行的健康波多黎各冠蟾蜍(Peltophryne狐猴)。
目的:评估哺乳动物、爬行动物和鸟类常用的神经系统测试,并在波多黎各冠蟾蜍中建立预期结果,从而为蟾蜍特异性神经系统检查提供建议。方法:于2024年4月以健康波多黎各冠蟾蜍(Peltophryne lemur)繁殖种群为研究对象。对每个个体进行基于其他物种中描述的标准测试的神经学检查。由3名观察员独立记录试验的可行性和结果。结果:共纳入12只蟾蜍。可行性较差的测试包括呼吸率(17%[12 / 2]的蟾蜍成功完成)和吞咽(8%[12 / 1])。许多测试缺失或不一致的结果,或观察者之间缺乏共识,包括威胁反应(11[6]出现在55%),眼部跟踪(在0% 11[0]),瞳孔对光反射(11[1]在8%),生理眼球震颤(存在于0% 12[0]),角膜感觉回应空气(存在于50% 10[5]),眼心反射(11[4]在36%),触觉放置(9[6]出现在67%),皮肤抽搐(存在于0% 12 [0]),髌骨反射(0%[0 / 12])。最一致的测试是眼睑反射、鼻皮质和面部刺激、角膜感觉(直接接触)、半步行、手推车和盆腔肢体退缩,所有观察者都确定测试完成和预期结果100%成功。结论:在其他物种中使用的一些神经学测试可能对波多黎各冠蟾蜍有用。可行性低或结果不一致的测试应给予较低的优先级。临床相关性:概述了蟾蜍特异性神经系统检查方案,以减少压力并增强神经定位。然而,物种之间的差异可能会影响结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
186
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Veterinary Research supports the collaborative exchange of information between researchers and clinicians by publishing novel research findings that bridge the gulf between basic research and clinical practice or that help to translate laboratory research and preclinical studies to the development of clinical trials and clinical practice. The journal welcomes submission of high-quality original studies and review articles in a wide range of scientific fields, including anatomy, anesthesiology, animal welfare, behavior, epidemiology, genetics, heredity, infectious disease, molecular biology, oncology, pharmacology, pathogenic mechanisms, physiology, surgery, theriogenology, toxicology, and vaccinology. Species of interest include production animals, companion animals, equids, exotic animals, birds, reptiles, and wild and marine animals. Reports of laboratory animal studies and studies involving the use of animals as experimental models of human diseases are considered only when the study results are of demonstrable benefit to the species used in the research or to another species of veterinary interest. Other fields of interest or animals species are not necessarily excluded from consideration, but such reports must focus on novel research findings. Submitted papers must make an original and substantial contribution to the veterinary medicine knowledge base; preliminary studies are not appropriate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信