Deer Vigilance and Movement Behavior Are Affected by Edge Density and Connectivity

IF 1.4 4区 生物学 Q4 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Ethology Pub Date : 2025-05-19 DOI:10.1111/eth.13574
Savannah L. Bartel, Leotie Hakkila, John L. Orrock
{"title":"Deer Vigilance and Movement Behavior Are Affected by Edge Density and Connectivity","authors":"Savannah L. Bartel,&nbsp;Leotie Hakkila,&nbsp;John L. Orrock","doi":"10.1111/eth.13574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Animal behavior is an important component of individual, population, and community responses to anthropogenic habitat alteration. For example, antipredator behavior (e.g., vigilance) and animal movement behavior may both be important behavioral responses to the increased density of habitat edges and changes in patch connectivity that characterize highly modified habitats. Importantly, edge density and connectivity might interact, and this interaction is likely to mediate animal behavior: linear, edge-rich landscape features often provide structural connectivity between patches, but the functional connectedness of patches for animal use could depend upon how edge density modifies animal vigilance and movement. Using remote cameras in large-scale experimental landscapes that manipulate edge density (high- vs. low-density edges) and patch connectivity (isolated or connected patches), we examined the effects of edge density and connectivity on the antipredator behavior and movement behavior of white-tailed deer (<i>Odocoileus virginianus</i>). Deer vigilance was 1.38 times greater near high-density edges compared to low-density edges, regardless of whether patches were connected or isolated. Deer were also more likely to move parallel to connected high-density edges than all other edge types, suggesting that connectivity promotes movement along high-density edges. These results suggest that increases in edge density that accompany human fragmentation of existing habitats may give rise to large-scale changes in the antipredator behavior of deer. These results also suggest that conservation strategies that simultaneously manipulate edge density and connectivity (i.e., habitat corridors) may have multiple effects on different aspects of deer behavior: linear habitat corridors were areas of high vigilance, but also areas where deer movement behavior implied increased movement along the habitat edge.</p>","PeriodicalId":50494,"journal":{"name":"Ethology","volume":"131 8","pages":"22-30"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/eth.13574","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eth.13574","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Animal behavior is an important component of individual, population, and community responses to anthropogenic habitat alteration. For example, antipredator behavior (e.g., vigilance) and animal movement behavior may both be important behavioral responses to the increased density of habitat edges and changes in patch connectivity that characterize highly modified habitats. Importantly, edge density and connectivity might interact, and this interaction is likely to mediate animal behavior: linear, edge-rich landscape features often provide structural connectivity between patches, but the functional connectedness of patches for animal use could depend upon how edge density modifies animal vigilance and movement. Using remote cameras in large-scale experimental landscapes that manipulate edge density (high- vs. low-density edges) and patch connectivity (isolated or connected patches), we examined the effects of edge density and connectivity on the antipredator behavior and movement behavior of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus). Deer vigilance was 1.38 times greater near high-density edges compared to low-density edges, regardless of whether patches were connected or isolated. Deer were also more likely to move parallel to connected high-density edges than all other edge types, suggesting that connectivity promotes movement along high-density edges. These results suggest that increases in edge density that accompany human fragmentation of existing habitats may give rise to large-scale changes in the antipredator behavior of deer. These results also suggest that conservation strategies that simultaneously manipulate edge density and connectivity (i.e., habitat corridors) may have multiple effects on different aspects of deer behavior: linear habitat corridors were areas of high vigilance, but also areas where deer movement behavior implied increased movement along the habitat edge.

Abstract Image

鹿的警惕性和运动行为受边缘密度和连通性的影响
动物行为是个体、种群和群落对人为生境改变反应的重要组成部分。例如,反捕食者行为(如警惕)和动物运动行为可能都是对栖息地边缘密度增加和斑块连通性变化的重要行为反应,这些变化是高度改变的栖息地的特征。重要的是,边缘密度和连通性可能相互作用,这种相互作用可能会调节动物的行为:线性的、边缘丰富的景观特征通常提供斑块之间的结构连通性,但动物使用斑块的功能连通性可能取决于边缘密度如何改变动物的警觉性和运动。在大规模实验景观中,利用远程摄像机控制边缘密度(高密度与低密度边缘)和斑块连通性(孤立或连接斑块),研究了边缘密度和连通性对白尾鹿(Odocoileus virginianus)反捕食者行为和运动行为的影响。在高密度边缘附近,鹿的警惕性是低密度边缘的1.38倍,无论斑块是连接的还是孤立的。与所有其他边缘类型相比,鹿也更有可能平行于连接的高密度边缘移动,这表明连通性促进了高密度边缘的移动。这些结果表明,随着人类对现有栖息地的破坏,边缘密度的增加可能会导致鹿的反捕食行为发生大规模变化。这些结果还表明,同时控制边缘密度和连通性的保护策略(即栖息地走廊)可能对鹿群行为的不同方面产生多重影响:线性栖息地走廊是高度警戒的区域,也是鹿群沿栖息地边缘运动行为增加的区域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ethology
Ethology 生物-动物学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
89
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: International in scope, Ethology publishes original research on behaviour including physiological mechanisms, function, and evolution. The Journal addresses behaviour in all species, from slime moulds to humans. Experimental research is preferred, both from the field and the lab, which is grounded in a theoretical framework. The section ''Perspectives and Current Debates'' provides an overview of the field and may include theoretical investigations and essays on controversial topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信