Algorithms for extraction of reliable density ratios from pre-stack seismic data—Part 2: Applications

IF 1.8 3区 地球科学 Q3 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Ivan Lehocki, Tapan Mukerji, Per Avseth, Erling Hugo Jensen
{"title":"Algorithms for extraction of reliable density ratios from pre-stack seismic data—Part 2: Applications","authors":"Ivan Lehocki,&nbsp;Tapan Mukerji,&nbsp;Per Avseth,&nbsp;Erling Hugo Jensen","doi":"10.1111/1365-2478.70030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We have developed two inversion algorithms to calculate the density ratio across a reflecting interface using Zoeppritz's equation for P-to-P wave reflections. At any point on the interface, we can calculate the most likely density ratio value with a corresponding standard deviation from a distribution of estimated (density ratio) values. This makes it possible to plot uncertainty maps at any interface of interest. Both inversion algorithms are applied within the near–far angle range to ensure the reliability of density ratio estimates. Although the methods can theoretically handle a wider range of angles, ultra-far angles are avoided due to amplitude distortions that become more pronounced at large incidence angles. A natural consequence of this restriction is that the herein-presented empiricism-free algorithms can be used for all classes of amplitude variation with offset (AVO) responses. At the heart of the first inversion scheme is a solver of a 12th-degree polynomial equation. The roots of the equation are calculated at an arbitrary number of incident angles. The solution space gives rise to a distribution from which the most frequent value (representing the maximum of the distribution) is taken as the most likely value. The second scheme involves solving a 5th-degree polynomial equation for the square of the <i>V</i><sub>P</sub>/<i>V</i><sub>S</sub> ratio of layer 2 (in a two-layered earth model) also at an arbitrary number of incident angles. The most likely density ratio estimate and the associated uncertainty are obtained as a byproduct of the calculation. We test both methods on a seismic dataset from the Barents Sea. The two methods yield very similar density ratio maps on the studied interface. Moreover, except for one well, they give a good match with estimated values from well-log data. This study is the second part of a two-part research. While Part I focuses on the theoretical foundations and synthetic validation of the inversion methods, this paper applies them to real seismic data to evaluate their practical performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":12793,"journal":{"name":"Geophysical Prospecting","volume":"73 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geophysical Prospecting","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1365-2478.70030","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We have developed two inversion algorithms to calculate the density ratio across a reflecting interface using Zoeppritz's equation for P-to-P wave reflections. At any point on the interface, we can calculate the most likely density ratio value with a corresponding standard deviation from a distribution of estimated (density ratio) values. This makes it possible to plot uncertainty maps at any interface of interest. Both inversion algorithms are applied within the near–far angle range to ensure the reliability of density ratio estimates. Although the methods can theoretically handle a wider range of angles, ultra-far angles are avoided due to amplitude distortions that become more pronounced at large incidence angles. A natural consequence of this restriction is that the herein-presented empiricism-free algorithms can be used for all classes of amplitude variation with offset (AVO) responses. At the heart of the first inversion scheme is a solver of a 12th-degree polynomial equation. The roots of the equation are calculated at an arbitrary number of incident angles. The solution space gives rise to a distribution from which the most frequent value (representing the maximum of the distribution) is taken as the most likely value. The second scheme involves solving a 5th-degree polynomial equation for the square of the VP/VS ratio of layer 2 (in a two-layered earth model) also at an arbitrary number of incident angles. The most likely density ratio estimate and the associated uncertainty are obtained as a byproduct of the calculation. We test both methods on a seismic dataset from the Barents Sea. The two methods yield very similar density ratio maps on the studied interface. Moreover, except for one well, they give a good match with estimated values from well-log data. This study is the second part of a two-part research. While Part I focuses on the theoretical foundations and synthetic validation of the inversion methods, this paper applies them to real seismic data to evaluate their practical performance.

从叠前地震数据中提取可靠密度比的算法。第2部分:应用
我们开发了两种反演算法,使用Zoeppritz的p - p波反射方程来计算反射界面上的密度比。在界面上的任何一点,我们都可以计算出最可能的密度比值,并从估计(密度比)值的分布中得到相应的标准差。这使得在任何感兴趣的接口上绘制不确定性图成为可能。两种反演算法均在近远角范围内应用,以保证密度比估计的可靠性。虽然这些方法理论上可以处理更大范围的角度,但由于在大入射角时幅度失真变得更加明显,因此避免了超远角。这种限制的一个自然结果是,本文提出的无经验算法可用于具有偏移(AVO)响应的所有类别的振幅变化。第一个反演方案的核心是一个12次多项式方程的求解器。在任意数量的入射角下计算方程的根。解空间产生一个分布,其中最常见的值(代表分布的最大值)被作为最可能的值。第二种方案涉及在任意数量的入射角下求解第2层(在双层地球模型中)VP/VS比的平方的5次多项式方程。最可能的密度比估计值和相关的不确定性作为计算的副产品得到。我们在巴伦支海的地震数据集上测试了这两种方法。这两种方法在所研究的界面上产生非常相似的密度比图。此外,除一口井外,它们与测井资料的估计值吻合良好。这项研究是两部分研究的第二部分。第一部分主要介绍了反演方法的理论基础和综合验证,并将其应用于实际地震资料中,评价其实际性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geophysical Prospecting
Geophysical Prospecting 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.50%
发文量
118
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Geophysical Prospecting publishes the best in primary research on the science of geophysics as it applies to the exploration, evaluation and extraction of earth resources. Drawing heavily on contributions from researchers in the oil and mineral exploration industries, the journal has a very practical slant. Although the journal provides a valuable forum for communication among workers in these fields, it is also ideally suited to researchers in academic geophysics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信