Revisiting Afghanistan's Drug Policy: A Policy Analysis of Eradication, Harm Reduction, and Economic Dependencies

IF 2.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Mohammad Qais Azizi, Mohammad Faisal Wardak, Edris Afzali, Ali Rahimi, Jerico Bautista Ogaya, Enayatollah Ejaz, Basir Ahmad Hasin, Mohammad Masudi, Don Eliseo Lucero-Prisno III
{"title":"Revisiting Afghanistan's Drug Policy: A Policy Analysis of Eradication, Harm Reduction, and Economic Dependencies","authors":"Mohammad Qais Azizi,&nbsp;Mohammad Faisal Wardak,&nbsp;Edris Afzali,&nbsp;Ali Rahimi,&nbsp;Jerico Bautista Ogaya,&nbsp;Enayatollah Ejaz,&nbsp;Basir Ahmad Hasin,&nbsp;Mohammad Masudi,&nbsp;Don Eliseo Lucero-Prisno III","doi":"10.1002/hsr2.71008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Afghanistan's responses to illicit drugs have oscillated between punitive eradication and limited harm-reduction initiatives. Two decades of heavy external spending, entrenched conflict, and an economy intertwined with opium have blunted policy effectiveness.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Guided by Walt and Gilson's policy-triangle, we undertook a document-based review (2001–2024). Twenty-seven national laws, strategies, and analytical reports were retrieved from government and multilateral repositories. Data were coded thematically using Braun-and-Clarke's six-phase approach to map policy content, actors, context, and implementation barriers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Four themes emerged. <i>First</i>, Afghan drug policy has passed through distinct phases—post-2001 tolerance, eradication campaigns, a harm-reduction window, and the current Afghan government's prohibition—each shaped by shifting political economies. <i>Second</i>, a complex actor constellation spans ministries, insurgent groups, multilateral donors, and opium-dependent farming communities, often with conflicting incentives. <i>Third</i>, implementation is hampered by corruption, chronic insecurity, rural poverty, and a shrinking treatment infrastructure (113 centres for an estimated 1.5 million users in 2024). <i>Fourth</i>, persisting failures fuel cycles of addiction, rural impoverishment, and insurgent financing, while recent poppy bans have accelerated a pivot to methamphetamine production.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Sustainable progress demands moving beyond short-term enforcement toward an integrated rural-development and public-health agenda. Priorities include: (i) secure livelihood alternatives for farmers; (ii) restoration and scale-up of evidence-based treatment and harm-reduction services; (iii) transparent governance mechanisms that engage local communities. A balanced, context-sensitive policy mix offers the best prospect of reducing drug-related harm while addressing the structural drivers that have long frustrated Afghan counter-narcotics efforts.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36518,"journal":{"name":"Health Science Reports","volume":"8 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hsr2.71008","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Science Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hsr2.71008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Afghanistan's responses to illicit drugs have oscillated between punitive eradication and limited harm-reduction initiatives. Two decades of heavy external spending, entrenched conflict, and an economy intertwined with opium have blunted policy effectiveness.

Methods

Guided by Walt and Gilson's policy-triangle, we undertook a document-based review (2001–2024). Twenty-seven national laws, strategies, and analytical reports were retrieved from government and multilateral repositories. Data were coded thematically using Braun-and-Clarke's six-phase approach to map policy content, actors, context, and implementation barriers.

Results

Four themes emerged. First, Afghan drug policy has passed through distinct phases—post-2001 tolerance, eradication campaigns, a harm-reduction window, and the current Afghan government's prohibition—each shaped by shifting political economies. Second, a complex actor constellation spans ministries, insurgent groups, multilateral donors, and opium-dependent farming communities, often with conflicting incentives. Third, implementation is hampered by corruption, chronic insecurity, rural poverty, and a shrinking treatment infrastructure (113 centres for an estimated 1.5 million users in 2024). Fourth, persisting failures fuel cycles of addiction, rural impoverishment, and insurgent financing, while recent poppy bans have accelerated a pivot to methamphetamine production.

Conclusion

Sustainable progress demands moving beyond short-term enforcement toward an integrated rural-development and public-health agenda. Priorities include: (i) secure livelihood alternatives for farmers; (ii) restoration and scale-up of evidence-based treatment and harm-reduction services; (iii) transparent governance mechanisms that engage local communities. A balanced, context-sensitive policy mix offers the best prospect of reducing drug-related harm while addressing the structural drivers that have long frustrated Afghan counter-narcotics efforts.

Abstract Image

重新审视阿富汗毒品政策:根除、减少危害和经济依赖的政策分析
阿富汗对非法毒品的反应在惩罚性根除和有限的减少危害行动之间摇摆不定。20年来的巨额对外支出、根深蒂固的冲突以及与鸦片交织在一起的经济,削弱了政策的有效性。方法在Walt和 Gilson的政策三角理论的指导下,我们进行了基于文献的回顾(2001-2024)。从政府和多边资料库检索了27项国家法律、战略和分析报告。使用Braun-and-Clarke的六阶段方法对数据进行主题编码,以映射政策内容、参与者、上下文和实施障碍。结果出现了四个主题。首先,阿富汗的毒品政策经历了不同的阶段——2001年后的容忍、根除运动、减少危害的窗口期和当前阿富汗政府的禁毒期——每一个阶段都受到政治经济变化的影响。其次,一个复杂的行动者群体包括政府各部、叛乱组织、多边捐助者和依赖鸦片的农业社区,他们的动机往往相互矛盾。第三,实施工作受到腐败、长期不安全、农村贫困和治疗基础设施萎缩( 2024年为150万 用户提供113个中心)的阻碍。第四,持续的失败加剧了成瘾、农村贫困和叛乱分子融资的循环,而最近的罂粟禁令加速了向甲基苯丙胺生产的转移。结论:要取得可持续的进展,就必须超越短期的强制执行,而采取综合的农村发展和公共卫生议程。优先事项包括:(i)确保农民的生计选择;恢复和扩大循证治疗和减少伤害服务;(三)有地方社区参与的透明治理机制。一个平衡的、考虑到具体情况的政策组合为减少与毒品有关的伤害提供了最好的前景,同时解决长期阻碍阿富汗禁毒努力的结构性驱动因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Science Reports
Health Science Reports Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
458
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信