Kinematic Analysis of Synchronized Skaters During the Off-Ice Execution of Spiral and Spin Tasks

IF 3
Johanna Szenczi, Dorottya Ágoston, Rita M. Kiss, János Négyesi
{"title":"Kinematic Analysis of Synchronized Skaters During the Off-Ice Execution of Spiral and Spin Tasks","authors":"Johanna Szenczi,&nbsp;Dorottya Ágoston,&nbsp;Rita M. Kiss,&nbsp;János Négyesi","doi":"10.1002/ejsc.12331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The primary objective of the present study was to examine differences and associations in joint angles and segmental swings during the off-ice execution of one static (spiral) and one dynamic (spin) sport-specific balance task and to determine whether motor control strategies differ when participants perform the tasks on their dominant and nondominant legs. Junior synchronized skaters (<i>n</i> = 15, age = 16.3 ± 1.5 years, years of practice: 9.8 ± 2.8 years, 10 females) performed spiral and spin tasks three times with 60 s of rest allowed between each trial. Participants' movements were captured using an optical-based motion capture (MoCap) system that utilized 39 skin-attached retro-reflective markers. Our results indicate no differences in synchronized skaters' kinematic features when the spiral task is performed on their dominant versus nondominant leg (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). However, the results of Spearman's correlation analyses suggest different motor control strategies between the various body segments during right- versus left-leg task execution. In addition, participants produced a larger swing with their left versus right arm, regardless of whether the spiral task was performed on the dominant (39.97 ± 10.32 vs. 30.22 ± 7.80, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) or the nondominant (52.88 ± 13.65 vs. 37.12 ± 9.59, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) leg. Lastly, the association between the knee angle of the supporting leg and the swing of the head (<i>ρ</i> = −0.54; <i>p</i> = 0.038) suggests that the greater the knee angle of the support leg during the spins, the less compensatory head swing was needed during the task.</p>","PeriodicalId":93999,"journal":{"name":"European journal of sport science","volume":"25 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejsc.12331","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of sport science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejsc.12331","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The primary objective of the present study was to examine differences and associations in joint angles and segmental swings during the off-ice execution of one static (spiral) and one dynamic (spin) sport-specific balance task and to determine whether motor control strategies differ when participants perform the tasks on their dominant and nondominant legs. Junior synchronized skaters (n = 15, age = 16.3 ± 1.5 years, years of practice: 9.8 ± 2.8 years, 10 females) performed spiral and spin tasks three times with 60 s of rest allowed between each trial. Participants' movements were captured using an optical-based motion capture (MoCap) system that utilized 39 skin-attached retro-reflective markers. Our results indicate no differences in synchronized skaters' kinematic features when the spiral task is performed on their dominant versus nondominant leg (p > 0.05). However, the results of Spearman's correlation analyses suggest different motor control strategies between the various body segments during right- versus left-leg task execution. In addition, participants produced a larger swing with their left versus right arm, regardless of whether the spiral task was performed on the dominant (39.97 ± 10.32 vs. 30.22 ± 7.80, p < 0.001) or the nondominant (52.88 ± 13.65 vs. 37.12 ± 9.59, p < 0.001) leg. Lastly, the association between the knee angle of the supporting leg and the swing of the head (ρ = −0.54; p = 0.038) suggests that the greater the knee angle of the support leg during the spins, the less compensatory head swing was needed during the task.

Abstract Image

花样滑冰运动员在冰上执行螺旋和旋转动作时的运动学分析
本研究的主要目的是检查在冰上执行一个静态(螺旋)和一个动态(旋转)运动特定平衡任务时关节角度和节段摆动的差异和关联,并确定当参与者在其主导和非主导腿上执行任务时运动控制策略是否不同。青少年花样滑冰运动员(15名,年龄16.3±1.5岁,练习年限9.8±2.8年,女性10名)分别进行3次螺旋和旋转训练,每次训练之间休息60 s。使用基于光学的动作捕捉(MoCap)系统捕捉参与者的动作,该系统利用39个皮肤附着的反射标记。我们的研究结果表明,花样滑冰运动员在优势腿和非优势腿上进行螺旋任务时,其运动学特征没有差异(p >;0.05)。然而,Spearman的相关分析结果表明,在执行右腿和左腿任务时,不同身体部位的运动控制策略不同。此外,参与者的左臂比右臂摆动更大,无论螺旋任务是否在优势臂上执行(39.97±10.32 vs. 30.22±7.80,p <;0.001)或非显性(52.88±13.65 vs. 37.12±9.59,p <;0.001)的腿。最后,支撑腿的膝盖角度与头部摆动之间的关系(ρ = - 0.54;P = 0.038)表明旋转时支撑腿的膝盖角度越大,任务时需要的补偿性头部摆动就越少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信