Mindfulness-based interventions for cancer patients in standard treatment: A meta-analysis of effects on depression, anxiety, and quality of life

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Ema Štánerová , Veronika Zelenayová , Jakub Rajčáni
{"title":"Mindfulness-based interventions for cancer patients in standard treatment: A meta-analysis of effects on depression, anxiety, and quality of life","authors":"Ema Štánerová ,&nbsp;Veronika Zelenayová ,&nbsp;Jakub Rajčáni","doi":"10.1016/j.jpsychores.2025.112312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Mindfulness interventions are indicated to be effective in reducing psychological symptoms faced by patients with cancer. However, there is a lack of revised evidence on their effectiveness during the active treatment phase. To address this research gap, we conducted a meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials with adult patients written in English, published in PubMed, Web of Science, PsycINFO and Scopus databases up to July 25, 2023. Studies with participants who completed oncological treatment more than 6 months before inclusion in the study were excluded. We calculated moderate effects on quality of life (12 studies with 1124 participants; SMD = 0.50; 95 % CI [0.33, 0.67]), depression (19 studies with 1586 participants; SMD = −0.60; 95 % CI [−0.79; −0.41]) and anxiety (20 studies with 1542 participants; SMD = −0.64; 95 % CI [−0.83, −0.46]), but with considerable heterogeneity. Subgroup analyses revealed that effectiveness differed for distinct types of intervention, but not for different cancer diagnoses. The overall quality of evidence (GRADE) was low mainly due to unexplained heterogeneity and risk of bias in most studies. Our findings highlight the importance of thoroughly examining sources of heterogeneity and enhancing methodological transparency in primary studies within oncology populations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50074,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychosomatic Research","volume":"196 ","pages":"Article 112312"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychosomatic Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022399925002764","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mindfulness interventions are indicated to be effective in reducing psychological symptoms faced by patients with cancer. However, there is a lack of revised evidence on their effectiveness during the active treatment phase. To address this research gap, we conducted a meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials with adult patients written in English, published in PubMed, Web of Science, PsycINFO and Scopus databases up to July 25, 2023. Studies with participants who completed oncological treatment more than 6 months before inclusion in the study were excluded. We calculated moderate effects on quality of life (12 studies with 1124 participants; SMD = 0.50; 95 % CI [0.33, 0.67]), depression (19 studies with 1586 participants; SMD = −0.60; 95 % CI [−0.79; −0.41]) and anxiety (20 studies with 1542 participants; SMD = −0.64; 95 % CI [−0.83, −0.46]), but with considerable heterogeneity. Subgroup analyses revealed that effectiveness differed for distinct types of intervention, but not for different cancer diagnoses. The overall quality of evidence (GRADE) was low mainly due to unexplained heterogeneity and risk of bias in most studies. Our findings highlight the importance of thoroughly examining sources of heterogeneity and enhancing methodological transparency in primary studies within oncology populations.
标准治疗中癌症患者的正念干预:对抑郁、焦虑和生活质量影响的荟萃分析
正念干预在减少癌症患者面临的心理症状方面是有效的。然而,在积极治疗阶段缺乏关于其有效性的修订证据。为了解决这一研究空白,我们对成人患者的对照临床试验进行了荟萃分析,这些试验以英文撰写,发表于PubMed, Web of Science, PsycINFO和Scopus数据库,截止到2023年7月25日。受试者在纳入研究前完成肿瘤治疗超过6个月的研究被排除在外。我们计算了对生活质量的中等影响(12项研究,1124名参与者;smd = 0.50;95% CI[0.33, 0.67]),抑郁症(19项研究,1586名受试者;smd =−0.60;95% ci[−0.79;−0.41])和焦虑(20项研究,1542名受试者;smd =−0.64;95% CI[−0.83,−0.46]),但存在相当大的异质性。亚组分析显示,不同类型的干预措施效果不同,但对不同的癌症诊断没有影响。总体证据质量(GRADE)较低,主要是由于大多数研究存在无法解释的异质性和偏倚风险。我们的研究结果强调了在肿瘤人群的初级研究中彻底检查异质性来源和提高方法透明度的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Journal of Psychosomatic Research 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
6.40%
发文量
314
审稿时长
6.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Psychosomatic Research is a multidisciplinary research journal covering all aspects of the relationships between psychology and medicine. The scope is broad and ranges from basic human biological and psychological research to evaluations of treatment and services. Papers will normally be concerned with illness or patients rather than studies of healthy populations. Studies concerning special populations, such as the elderly and children and adolescents, are welcome. In addition to peer-reviewed original papers, the journal publishes editorials, reviews, and other papers related to the journal''s aims.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信