Evaluating somatic cell count, the California mastitis test, and infrared thermography for subclinical mastitis detection in meat ewes

IF 1.8 3区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Gretchen L. Peckler, Sarah J.J. Adcock
{"title":"Evaluating somatic cell count, the California mastitis test, and infrared thermography for subclinical mastitis detection in meat ewes","authors":"Gretchen L. Peckler,&nbsp;Sarah J.J. Adcock","doi":"10.1016/j.rvsc.2025.105791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Mastitis is a major concern in sheep farming. Detecting subclinical mastitis, which manifests without apparent signs, is particularly challenging. While somatic cell count (SCC) and the California Mastitis Test (CMT) are widely used in dairy animals, and infrared thermography has shown some promise, their diagnostic performance in meat sheep remains under-evaluated. This study aimed to 1) characterize SCC and udder skin surface temperature across lactation in subclinically infected and uninfected udder halves; 2) determine diagnostic cutoffs for SCC, CMT, and thermography; and 3) compare diagnostic performance using receiver operating characteristic curves. Milk and thermal data were collected weekly from 37 clinically healthy nursing ewes over the first 8 weeks postpartum. Infection was defined by ≥100 CFU/mL of a bacterial species. Infected udder halves had higher log SCCs than uninfected halves in weeks 1–4 and 6 postpartum. Infection status did not predict udder skin temperature, which was more influenced by ambient temperature. SCC had the highest diagnostic performance (AUC = 0.78), with an optimal cutoff of 148,500 cells/mL (sensitivity = 0.77; specificity = 0.66). The CMT yielded an AUC of 0.70 with an optimal cutoff score above negative (i.e., trace or positive reaction; sensitivity = 0.77; specificity = 0.51). Udder skin temperature had the lowest AUC (0.56). SCC is the most effective of the three tools for detecting subclinical mastitis, although CMT may serve as a useful on-farm screening tool. Infrared thermography did not detect subclinical infection, highlighting the need for further research into non-invasive diagnostics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21083,"journal":{"name":"Research in veterinary science","volume":"193 ","pages":"Article 105791"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in veterinary science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034528825002656","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mastitis is a major concern in sheep farming. Detecting subclinical mastitis, which manifests without apparent signs, is particularly challenging. While somatic cell count (SCC) and the California Mastitis Test (CMT) are widely used in dairy animals, and infrared thermography has shown some promise, their diagnostic performance in meat sheep remains under-evaluated. This study aimed to 1) characterize SCC and udder skin surface temperature across lactation in subclinically infected and uninfected udder halves; 2) determine diagnostic cutoffs for SCC, CMT, and thermography; and 3) compare diagnostic performance using receiver operating characteristic curves. Milk and thermal data were collected weekly from 37 clinically healthy nursing ewes over the first 8 weeks postpartum. Infection was defined by ≥100 CFU/mL of a bacterial species. Infected udder halves had higher log SCCs than uninfected halves in weeks 1–4 and 6 postpartum. Infection status did not predict udder skin temperature, which was more influenced by ambient temperature. SCC had the highest diagnostic performance (AUC = 0.78), with an optimal cutoff of 148,500 cells/mL (sensitivity = 0.77; specificity = 0.66). The CMT yielded an AUC of 0.70 with an optimal cutoff score above negative (i.e., trace or positive reaction; sensitivity = 0.77; specificity = 0.51). Udder skin temperature had the lowest AUC (0.56). SCC is the most effective of the three tools for detecting subclinical mastitis, although CMT may serve as a useful on-farm screening tool. Infrared thermography did not detect subclinical infection, highlighting the need for further research into non-invasive diagnostics.
评估体细胞计数、加州乳腺炎试验和红外热成像对肉羊亚临床乳腺炎检测的影响
乳腺炎是绵羊养殖业的一个主要问题。检测无明显体征的亚临床乳腺炎尤其具有挑战性。虽然体细胞计数(SCC)和加州乳腺炎试验(CMT)广泛应用于奶牛,红外热成像显示出一些希望,但它们在肉羊中的诊断性能仍未得到充分评价。本研究的目的是:1)在亚临床感染和未感染的一半乳房中,表征SCC和乳房皮肤表面温度;2)确定SCC、CMT和热成像的诊断截止值;3)利用受者工作特征曲线比较诊断性能。在产后前8周,每周收集37只临床健康护理母羊的奶和热数据。感染定义为≥100 CFU/mL的细菌种类。在产后1-4周和6周,感染的一半乳房的对数SCCs高于未感染的一半。感染状态不能预测乳房皮肤温度,皮肤温度受环境温度影响较大。SCC具有最高的诊断性能(AUC = 0.78),最佳临界值为148,500个细胞/mL(灵敏度= 0.77;特异性= 0.66)。CMT的AUC为0.70,最佳临界值高于阴性(即痕量或阳性反应;灵敏度= 0.77;特异性= 0.51)。乳房皮肤温度的AUC最低(0.56)。SCC是检测亚临床乳腺炎的三种工具中最有效的,尽管CMT可能作为一种有用的农场筛查工具。红外热成像未检测到亚临床感染,强调了进一步研究非侵入性诊断的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Research in veterinary science
Research in veterinary science 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
312
审稿时长
75 days
期刊介绍: Research in Veterinary Science is an International multi-disciplinary journal publishing original articles, reviews and short communications of a high scientific and ethical standard in all aspects of veterinary and biomedical research. The primary aim of the journal is to inform veterinary and biomedical scientists of significant advances in veterinary and related research through prompt publication and dissemination. Secondly, the journal aims to provide a general multi-disciplinary forum for discussion and debate of news and issues concerning veterinary science. Thirdly, to promote the dissemination of knowledge to a broader range of professions, globally. High quality papers on all species of animals are considered, particularly those considered to be of high scientific importance and originality, and with interdisciplinary interest. The journal encourages papers providing results that have clear implications for understanding disease pathogenesis and for the development of control measures or treatments, as well as those dealing with a comparative biomedical approach, which represents a substantial improvement to animal and human health. Studies without a robust scientific hypothesis or that are preliminary, or of weak originality, as well as negative results, are not appropriate for the journal. Furthermore, observational approaches, case studies or field reports lacking an advancement in general knowledge do not fall within the scope of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信