Global climate commitments and local disconnect: Imagining climate change through Indonesia's community climate program

IF 3.1 Q1 Social Sciences
Raudlatul Jannah , Lala M. Kolopaking , Soeryo Adiwibowo , Syamsul Maarif
{"title":"Global climate commitments and local disconnect: Imagining climate change through Indonesia's community climate program","authors":"Raudlatul Jannah ,&nbsp;Lala M. Kolopaking ,&nbsp;Soeryo Adiwibowo ,&nbsp;Syamsul Maarif","doi":"10.1016/j.glt.2025.06.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Amid growing global attention to climate change, this study explores the sociopolitical dynamics of institutionalizing climate knowledge in rural Indonesia by examining the implementation of the Climate Village Program (<em>Proklim</em>) in four villages in Probolinggo Regency. Drawing on Maarten Hajer's <em>Argumentative Discourse Analysis</em> and C. Wright Mills' concept of <em>sociological imagination</em>, the study addresses two central questions: (1) how is climate change framed and communicated to rural communities, and (2) how do communities interpret and respond to this knowledge? Data were collected through observations of <em>Proklim</em> activities and interviews with the village residents. The findings show that climate change discourse is largely shaped by top-down narratives aligned with global frameworks, such as the Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs), yet these often fail to resonate with the everyday realities of rural populations. While a small portion of the community participates in adaptation practices, most prioritize urgent needs such as fertilizer subsidies and food security. This reflects a fundamental disconnection between global climate narratives and local priorities. Despite these challenges, <em>Proklim</em> functions as a discursive space that brings together government actors, private sector, and local communities, although significant power asymmetries remain. The study underscores the importance of realigning global climate commitments with local experiences, institutionalizing climate discourse within community social structures, and framing climate change not only as an environmental issue but also as a matter of public health and social resilience.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":33615,"journal":{"name":"Global Transitions","volume":"7 ","pages":"Pages 387-402"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Transitions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589791825000313","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Amid growing global attention to climate change, this study explores the sociopolitical dynamics of institutionalizing climate knowledge in rural Indonesia by examining the implementation of the Climate Village Program (Proklim) in four villages in Probolinggo Regency. Drawing on Maarten Hajer's Argumentative Discourse Analysis and C. Wright Mills' concept of sociological imagination, the study addresses two central questions: (1) how is climate change framed and communicated to rural communities, and (2) how do communities interpret and respond to this knowledge? Data were collected through observations of Proklim activities and interviews with the village residents. The findings show that climate change discourse is largely shaped by top-down narratives aligned with global frameworks, such as the Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs), yet these often fail to resonate with the everyday realities of rural populations. While a small portion of the community participates in adaptation practices, most prioritize urgent needs such as fertilizer subsidies and food security. This reflects a fundamental disconnection between global climate narratives and local priorities. Despite these challenges, Proklim functions as a discursive space that brings together government actors, private sector, and local communities, although significant power asymmetries remain. The study underscores the importance of realigning global climate commitments with local experiences, institutionalizing climate discourse within community social structures, and framing climate change not only as an environmental issue but also as a matter of public health and social resilience.
全球气候承诺与地方脱节:通过印度尼西亚的社区气候项目想象气候变化
在全球对气候变化日益关注的背景下,本研究通过考察气候村计划(Proklim)在Probolinggo县四个村庄的实施情况,探讨了印尼农村气候知识制度化的社会政治动态。利用Maarten Hajer的论辩话语分析和C. Wright Mills的社会学想象概念,该研究解决了两个核心问题:(1)气候变化是如何被构建并传达给农村社区的;(2)社区如何解释和回应这些知识?通过对Proklim活动的观察和对村庄居民的访谈收集数据。研究结果表明,气候变化话语在很大程度上是由与全球框架(如国家自主贡献)相一致的自上而下的叙事所塑造的,然而这些叙事往往无法与农村人口的日常现实产生共鸣。虽然社区中的一小部分人参与了适应实践,但大多数人优先考虑肥料补贴和粮食安全等迫切需求。这反映了全球气候叙事与地方优先事项之间的根本脱节。尽管存在这些挑战,Proklim作为一个话语空间,将政府行为者、私营部门和当地社区聚集在一起,尽管明显的权力不对称仍然存在。该研究强调了将全球气候承诺与地方经验重新调整的重要性,将社区社会结构中的气候话语制度化,并将气候变化不仅视为环境问题,而且视为公共卫生和社会复原力问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Transitions
Global Transitions Social Sciences-Development
CiteScore
18.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信