Comparing Direct Method and Backpropagation method in Determining GTN Parameters: A Quantitative Study

Chahboub Yassine , Szavai Szabolcs
{"title":"Comparing Direct Method and Backpropagation method in Determining GTN Parameters: A Quantitative Study","authors":"Chahboub Yassine ,&nbsp;Szavai Szabolcs","doi":"10.1016/j.prostr.2025.06.059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>GTN model is among the best models that simulate crack growth at the microscopic level. Estimating crack propagation is vitally important to ensure an effective operation of different equipment and avoid breakdowns, especially in the field of nuclear energy.</div><div>However, the GTN parameters determination is a complicated process that requires much time and analysis.</div><div>Several studies have dealt with this problem and tried different methods to determine GTN parameters, some examples being the direct method, and the backpropagation method.</div><div>My main objective in this work was to do a quantitative comparison among the direct method and the backpropagation approach and to find out the best and the method which is fully optimized for the GTN parameters.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20518,"journal":{"name":"Procedia Structural Integrity","volume":"68 ","pages":"Pages 310-317"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Procedia Structural Integrity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452321625000605","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

GTN model is among the best models that simulate crack growth at the microscopic level. Estimating crack propagation is vitally important to ensure an effective operation of different equipment and avoid breakdowns, especially in the field of nuclear energy.
However, the GTN parameters determination is a complicated process that requires much time and analysis.
Several studies have dealt with this problem and tried different methods to determine GTN parameters, some examples being the direct method, and the backpropagation method.
My main objective in this work was to do a quantitative comparison among the direct method and the backpropagation approach and to find out the best and the method which is fully optimized for the GTN parameters.
直接法与反向传播法在GTN参数确定中的比较定量研究
GTN模型是在微观水平上模拟裂纹扩展的最佳模型之一。裂纹扩展估算对于保证不同设备的有效运行和避免故障至关重要,特别是在核能领域。然而,GTN参数的确定是一个复杂的过程,需要大量的时间和分析。针对这一问题,已有一些研究尝试了不同的方法来确定GTN参数,例如直接法和反向传播法。在这项工作中,我的主要目标是对直接方法和反向传播方法进行定量比较,并找出最佳方法和对GTN参数进行充分优化的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信