Boundary conditions for hybrid simulations in a rectangular environment with sound-absorbing ceiling

IF 3.4 2区 物理与天体物理 Q1 ACOUSTICS
Giulia Fratoni, Dario D'Orazio
{"title":"Boundary conditions for hybrid simulations in a rectangular environment with sound-absorbing ceiling","authors":"Giulia Fratoni,&nbsp;Dario D'Orazio","doi":"10.1016/j.apacoust.2025.110933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Acoustic numerical models facilitate sound field prediction in challenging real-world scenarios, such as environments with non-uniform sound absorption distribution. The accuracy of their results strongly depends on the reliability of boundary conditions required as input data. Research has largely covered analytical models of pressure-based boundary conditions for wave-based simulation techniques. However, accessible lists of frequency-dependent acoustic impedances remain limited compared to the energy-based datasets widely available in the literature. Consequently, random-incidence absorption coefficients are often converted into complex surface impedances through non-unique processes. This work explores the potential discrepancies between the input data of a wave-based finite-element model (hybridized with ray-tracing), and the energy-based coefficients employed in analytical predictions and geometrical acoustics simulations. The 3D model of an existing rectangular space with a highly sound-absorbing surface (the ceiling) is a suitable test environment for this investigation. Room criteria obtained with in-field acoustic measurements, i.e., reverberation time and speech clarity, are the experimental reference data throughout the work. Focusing on the air-backed sound-absorbing tiles at the suspended ceiling, results reveal gaps in input data, suggesting a potential percentage of discrepancies between the analytical formula and numerical models' input data up to 25% at low-mid frequencies (125 Hz - 250 Hz - 500 Hz).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55506,"journal":{"name":"Applied Acoustics","volume":"240 ","pages":"Article 110933"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Acoustics","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003682X25004050","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Acoustic numerical models facilitate sound field prediction in challenging real-world scenarios, such as environments with non-uniform sound absorption distribution. The accuracy of their results strongly depends on the reliability of boundary conditions required as input data. Research has largely covered analytical models of pressure-based boundary conditions for wave-based simulation techniques. However, accessible lists of frequency-dependent acoustic impedances remain limited compared to the energy-based datasets widely available in the literature. Consequently, random-incidence absorption coefficients are often converted into complex surface impedances through non-unique processes. This work explores the potential discrepancies between the input data of a wave-based finite-element model (hybridized with ray-tracing), and the energy-based coefficients employed in analytical predictions and geometrical acoustics simulations. The 3D model of an existing rectangular space with a highly sound-absorbing surface (the ceiling) is a suitable test environment for this investigation. Room criteria obtained with in-field acoustic measurements, i.e., reverberation time and speech clarity, are the experimental reference data throughout the work. Focusing on the air-backed sound-absorbing tiles at the suspended ceiling, results reveal gaps in input data, suggesting a potential percentage of discrepancies between the analytical formula and numerical models' input data up to 25% at low-mid frequencies (125 Hz - 250 Hz - 500 Hz).
矩形吸声顶板混合仿真的边界条件
声学数值模型有助于在具有挑战性的现实环境中进行声场预测,例如声吸收分布不均匀的环境。其结果的准确性在很大程度上取决于作为输入数据所需的边界条件的可靠性。基于波浪的模拟技术的基于压力的边界条件的分析模型已经得到了很大程度的研究。然而,与文献中广泛可用的基于能量的数据集相比,频率相关声阻抗的可访问列表仍然有限。因此,随机入射吸收系数往往通过非唯一过程转化为复杂的表面阻抗。这项工作探讨了基于波动的有限元模型(与光线追踪混合)的输入数据与用于分析预测和几何声学模拟的基于能量的系数之间的潜在差异。现有的具有高吸声表面(天花板)的矩形空间的三维模型是本研究的合适测试环境。通过现场声学测量获得的房间标准,即混响时间和语音清晰度,是整个工作的实验参考数据。以吊顶上的空气吸声瓦为研究对象,结果揭示了输入数据中的差距,表明在中低频(125 Hz - 250 Hz - 500 Hz),分析公式和数值模型的输入数据之间的潜在差异百分比高达25%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Acoustics
Applied Acoustics 物理-声学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
11.80%
发文量
618
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Since its launch in 1968, Applied Acoustics has been publishing high quality research papers providing state-of-the-art coverage of research findings for engineers and scientists involved in applications of acoustics in the widest sense. Applied Acoustics looks not only at recent developments in the understanding of acoustics but also at ways of exploiting that understanding. The Journal aims to encourage the exchange of practical experience through publication and in so doing creates a fund of technological information that can be used for solving related problems. The presentation of information in graphical or tabular form is especially encouraged. If a report of a mathematical development is a necessary part of a paper it is important to ensure that it is there only as an integral part of a practical solution to a problem and is supported by data. Applied Acoustics encourages the exchange of practical experience in the following ways: • Complete Papers • Short Technical Notes • Review Articles; and thereby provides a wealth of technological information that can be used to solve related problems. Manuscripts that address all fields of applications of acoustics ranging from medicine and NDT to the environment and buildings are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信