The unintended cost of financial regulation in China: The impact of the new regulation on asset management on private firms' credit spreads

IF 4.8 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Chuang Lu , Tingyu Zhao , Yuhao Niu
{"title":"The unintended cost of financial regulation in China: The impact of the new regulation on asset management on private firms' credit spreads","authors":"Chuang Lu ,&nbsp;Tingyu Zhao ,&nbsp;Yuhao Niu","doi":"10.1016/j.pacfin.2025.102860","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Over the past two decades, shadow banking has expanded rapidly in many countries and governments have begun to take measures to deal with the financial risks shadow banking may create. Using the New Regulation on Asset Management (NRAM) policy introduced in China, we explore the unintended impact of financial regulation on the bond credit spreads between private firms and state-owned enterprises (SOEs). We find that after NRAM was introduced, the bond credit spreads between private firms and SOEs rose by 54 basis points, on average. Mechanism tests show that NRAM widens the bond credit spreads between private firms and SOEs by tightening bank credit resources and reducing firms' access to shadow bank financing. Heterogeneity analyses reveal the bond credit spreads between private firms and SOEs is larger in regions where informal financing was more developed before NRAM, and can be mitigated in regions where the formal financing environment is more friendly. We show the bond credit spreads between private firms and SOEs is higher for bonds without put option, smaller firms and firms with higher information asymmetry. We further find private firms have higher probability to provide guarantee after NRAM. Our findings provide empirical evidence on the impact of financial regulation on bond pricing and have some policy implications on establishing a reasonable financial regulatory system in emerging markets.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48074,"journal":{"name":"Pacific-Basin Finance Journal","volume":"93 ","pages":"Article 102860"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pacific-Basin Finance Journal","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927538X25001970","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the past two decades, shadow banking has expanded rapidly in many countries and governments have begun to take measures to deal with the financial risks shadow banking may create. Using the New Regulation on Asset Management (NRAM) policy introduced in China, we explore the unintended impact of financial regulation on the bond credit spreads between private firms and state-owned enterprises (SOEs). We find that after NRAM was introduced, the bond credit spreads between private firms and SOEs rose by 54 basis points, on average. Mechanism tests show that NRAM widens the bond credit spreads between private firms and SOEs by tightening bank credit resources and reducing firms' access to shadow bank financing. Heterogeneity analyses reveal the bond credit spreads between private firms and SOEs is larger in regions where informal financing was more developed before NRAM, and can be mitigated in regions where the formal financing environment is more friendly. We show the bond credit spreads between private firms and SOEs is higher for bonds without put option, smaller firms and firms with higher information asymmetry. We further find private firms have higher probability to provide guarantee after NRAM. Our findings provide empirical evidence on the impact of financial regulation on bond pricing and have some policy implications on establishing a reasonable financial regulatory system in emerging markets.
中国金融监管的意外成本:资产管理新规对民营企业信贷利差的影响
在过去的二十年里,影子银行在许多国家迅速扩张,政府已经开始采取措施应对影子银行可能产生的金融风险。利用中国出台的资产管理新规(NRAM)政策,我们探讨了金融监管对私营企业和国有企业(soe)之间债券信用利差的意外影响。我们发现,引入NRAM后,民营企业和国有企业之间的债券信用利差平均上升了54个基点。机制测试表明,NRAM通过收紧银行信贷资源和减少企业获得影子银行融资的机会,扩大了私营企业和国有企业之间的债券信贷利差。异质性分析表明,民营企业和国有企业之间的债券信用利差在非公有制经济前非正式融资较为发达的地区较大,而在正式融资环境较为友好的地区可以得到缓解。我们发现,对于没有看跌期权、规模较小的企业和信息不对称程度较高的企业,民营企业和国有企业之间的债券信用利差更高。我们进一步发现民营企业在NRAM之后提供担保的可能性更高。本文的研究结果为金融监管对债券定价的影响提供了实证证据,并对新兴市场建立合理的金融监管体系具有一定的政策启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pacific-Basin Finance Journal
Pacific-Basin Finance Journal BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
6.50%
发文量
157
期刊介绍: The Pacific-Basin Finance Journal is aimed at providing a specialized forum for the publication of academic research on capital markets of the Asia-Pacific countries. Primary emphasis will be placed on the highest quality empirical and theoretical research in the following areas: • Market Micro-structure; • Investment and Portfolio Management; • Theories of Market Equilibrium; • Valuation of Financial and Real Assets; • Behavior of Asset Prices in Financial Sectors; • Normative Theory of Financial Management; • Capital Markets of Development; • Market Mechanisms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信