Developing a list of chronic conditions using a Delphi method to study multimorbidity in primary care

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Alexandre Malmartel , Juliette Pinot , Marie Ecollan , Nicolas De Chanaud , Jean-Claude Schwartz , Stéphanie Sidorkiewicz , Céline Buffel Du Vaure
{"title":"Developing a list of chronic conditions using a Delphi method to study multimorbidity in primary care","authors":"Alexandre Malmartel ,&nbsp;Juliette Pinot ,&nbsp;Marie Ecollan ,&nbsp;Nicolas De Chanaud ,&nbsp;Jean-Claude Schwartz ,&nbsp;Stéphanie Sidorkiewicz ,&nbsp;Céline Buffel Du Vaure","doi":"10.1016/j.puhe.2025.105850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To develop a French-language list of chronic conditions to enable more detailed analyses of multimorbid patients in primary care in subsequent studies.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>Delphi study followed by a multicentre cross-sectional study in French general practices.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The list development required a three-step procedure: 1) The development of a preliminary version of the list based on the International Classification of Primary Care-2 (ICPC-2): an expert panel of general practitioners participated in two Delphi rounds to assess the relevance of the items as “chronic conditions”. 2) Testing the list with outpatients consecutively included in general practices. 3) A final Delphi round accounting for the results of the outpatient list experimentation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>From the 726 items of the ICPC-2, 383 items were submitted to 12 experts. In the first Delphi round, 126 items were accepted and 81 excluded. During the second, 2 additional items were retained and 86 excluded. Then, the experts selected 22 supplementary items from the 88 remaining, and a preliminary list of 124 items has been established after grouping similar items. During the test phase, 16 physicians and 306 patients rated 98 items as “already listed”, 58 as “unlisted” and 19 as “unsuitable”. During the final Delphi round, the experts selected 11 more items among the unlisted and finalized the list at 135 items.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This list of 135 chronic conditions has been developed with a valid methodology. It is useable by physicians and will allow a more accurate study of multimorbidity in primary care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49651,"journal":{"name":"Public Health","volume":"247 ","pages":"Article 105850"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033350625002963","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To develop a French-language list of chronic conditions to enable more detailed analyses of multimorbid patients in primary care in subsequent studies.

Study design

Delphi study followed by a multicentre cross-sectional study in French general practices.

Methods

The list development required a three-step procedure: 1) The development of a preliminary version of the list based on the International Classification of Primary Care-2 (ICPC-2): an expert panel of general practitioners participated in two Delphi rounds to assess the relevance of the items as “chronic conditions”. 2) Testing the list with outpatients consecutively included in general practices. 3) A final Delphi round accounting for the results of the outpatient list experimentation.

Results

From the 726 items of the ICPC-2, 383 items were submitted to 12 experts. In the first Delphi round, 126 items were accepted and 81 excluded. During the second, 2 additional items were retained and 86 excluded. Then, the experts selected 22 supplementary items from the 88 remaining, and a preliminary list of 124 items has been established after grouping similar items. During the test phase, 16 physicians and 306 patients rated 98 items as “already listed”, 58 as “unlisted” and 19 as “unsuitable”. During the final Delphi round, the experts selected 11 more items among the unlisted and finalized the list at 135 items.

Conclusion

This list of 135 chronic conditions has been developed with a valid methodology. It is useable by physicians and will allow a more accurate study of multimorbidity in primary care.
采用德尔菲法编制慢性病清单,研究初级保健中的多发病情况
目的建立一份法语慢性病清单,以便在后续研究中对初级保健中的多病患者进行更详细的分析。研究设计:德尔菲研究之后是法国全科实践的多中心横断面研究。方法清单的制定需要三个步骤:1)根据国际初级保健分类-2 (ICPC-2)制定清单的初步版本:由全科医生组成的专家小组参与了两轮德尔菲调查,以评估项目作为“慢性病”的相关性。2)对全科门诊连续纳入的门诊患者进行检验。3)门诊名单实验结果的最终德尔菲轮核算。结果在ICPC-2的726个项目中,向12位专家提交了383个项目。在第一轮德尔菲中,126个项目被接受,81个项目被排除。在第二次期间,额外保留了2个项目,排除了86个项目。然后,专家们从剩下的88个项目中选择了22个补充项目,对类似项目进行分组后,形成了124个项目的初步清单。在测试阶段,16名医生和306名患者对98项“已列入”,58项“未列入”和19项“不适合”进行了评分。在最后一轮德尔菲评审中,专家们从未列入名单的项目中又选出了11个项目,最终确定了135个项目。结论135种慢性疾病的清单编制方法有效。它可供医生使用,并将允许对初级保健中的多病进行更准确的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Public Health
Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
280
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Public Health is an international, multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal. It publishes original papers, reviews and short reports on all aspects of the science, philosophy, and practice of public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信